• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is not believing in an eternal hell Heresy?

Status
Not open for further replies.

2ducklow

angel duck
Jul 29, 2005
8,631
125
✟9,570.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
You didn't understand a thing that I explained to you, did you?

I've kinda forgot what the subject is. but then i was watching this interesting cop show today and about 2/3 of the way through I realized I had already seen it before.

I think we might have moved up to the 4th or 5th grade now.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Ronald

Exhortations
Site Supporter
Jul 30, 2004
4,620
981
southern
✟111,578.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
 
Upvote 0

2ducklow

angel duck
Jul 29, 2005
8,631
125
✟9,570.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
calling me a heretic cause I don't believe Jesus is God is just as slanderous as me calling you a moron for believing 3 is one. heretic is a word that's meant to insult and hurt, just like moron is.
 
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't believe in the spurious scriptures and interpolations of scriptures inserted to change the word of God. And that is the major proof that Jesus is God.

John 1:1, 14 and John chapters 14, 15 and 16. Anything spurious there ?
 
Upvote 0

shturt678s

Regular Member
Dec 11, 2013
2,733
118
✟25,797.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Do you believe the Bible?

Falsifying the Word of God dealing with faith, baptism, and repentance is obviously heresy, ie, a big part of "repentance" is Rom.3:18, "fear" construed with Matt.10:28, "afraid" thus removing forever and ever in torments is a big no no!

Can"t wait till you folks hit 74 or so, ie, being even implicitely called a moron, stupid, heretic, and etc. doesn't penetrate one's elephant skin except being called "late for dinner."

Old Jack that believes the context of translated Bible Texts.

Nothing spurious about Jesus = God, ie, even has a nice ring to it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Ain't that far away from that! I've been around the world three or two times.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

2ducklow

angel duck
Jul 29, 2005
8,631
125
✟9,570.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
John 1:1, 14 and John chapters 14, 15 and 16. Anything spurious there ?
yes there is, most all Christians take the word to be the preincarnate Christ, thus they have changed the word of god that says 'the word was God' to 'the preincarnate Christ was God.' The word is a term for the word of God, not for any preincarnate Christ.

I believe the word was God means that God's words are god. and I take that meaning figuratively to mean the same sort of thing as saying "your words Faith Alone are you." IN other words God's words tell us everything about who and what God is. God is not his words, but his words do tell us who and what he is.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I traveled outter island in Hawaii if that counts?

Hate that milage...need a new body.

Old Jack

I too have been around the block a time or two. I learned to read when FDR was president and I remember VE and VJ days.
 
Upvote 0

shturt678s

Regular Member
Dec 11, 2013
2,733
118
✟25,797.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
I too have been around the block a time or two. I learned to read when FDR was president and I remember VE and VJ days.

I received my MA in teaching using my G.I. Bill long ago, and consider you still one of my profs. I know this won't go to your head so don't mind encouraging you.

The only complaint I have is I have to keep buying note pads and pens and printer ink.

Old Jack still taking notes.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Thanx mucho. I used my GI bill more than 3 decades ago. I have a 4 GB flash drive and a 32 GB external HD which have just about every argument I have prepared in the last 14+ years. I got tired of digging for the same ol' lame ol' arguments over and over again. So now instead of searching the net I just look up the topic or scripture on my flash drive and post the response. Sometimes I have to tweak it a little.
 
Upvote 0

Stephen Kendall

believer of Jesus Christ
Sep 28, 2008
1,387
112
USA
✟17,173.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ever wonder how you can be obeying God by debating and arguing your time away? The Gospel isn't up for debate is it, just the suppose-tos meanings and additions to it? If you debated whether or not to turn the other cheek, no problem and no debate. If you debated if homosexuality is ok with God, no problem for real believers in Jesus, no debate. If you debated whether we were to love our enemies, no problem and no debate, right?! Where are we suppose our have problems and this rather wasteful time debating? We aren't. The Gospel is undebatable, right? So, if Jesus said it, stop, we believe it, stop, right? However, outside areas or grey areas away from Jesus' Gospel (his teachings and commands) are suppose to be for Christians to spend all their time wrangling and fussing over, and so they are excused from obeying Jesus' special command to his followers, "to be known by your love for one another," right?!

Aren't we really just trying to visualize the kind of persons that God and Jesus are? It seems a little strange to not know the God that we believe in! We have what Jesus gave us, which is mostly for us to be this way and that, and to be known by our love: "a loving, caring, giving and humble individual and spreading this that we follow and believe in (the Gospel, the undebatable one). We know what we are suppose to be: this fantastic child of God. Are we calling ourselves Christian with big "ifs", God is this way or that, and so we can't accept him if he isn't? The Gospel is about how we are to be, somehow this should tell us how God is to be. Let us concentrate as Jesus commanded us on ourselves (to obey his Gospel commands) and spreading this word of the Gospel to all the world, everywhere. Debating and arguing non-Gospel things isn't our calling. If we are this fantastic follower of Christ, we won't have time for all this chatter, right? Someone, help me here....

It seems that as debaters and arguing that we just don't meet Jesus' standard for followers. We should be concerned about ourselves and believe in the undebatable Gospel, and not what we don't know and shouldn't worry about, "we trust God don't we?"

If we are busy meditating and following Jesus' Gospel, we shouldn't have all these busy thoughts, which could actually be coming from the Devil anyway, right, his worries and doubts (busy work)?

We don't have doubt in the Gospel, so follow it and be busy with it. The only way that you can be known to be truly right is that you are truly a follower of Jesus and his one Gospel, period, right? By the way, it would be even easier to follow Jesus if we set aside all that was added, in which Jesus didn't even concern himself with, and just leave it out. Concentrate on how we are to be, and not how God and Jesus are to be, that is their business anyway, we believe in Jesus and so follow him.

This is where I find things like Trinity to be most un-useful, confusing, unnecessary and dividing. Jesus taught us to concentrate on ourselves, but Trinity (man's theology outside of the teachings and concerns of Jesus) teaches us to concentrate of God and Jesus. Which is going to get you into Heaven, obeying Jesus or this theology outside of his concern? Doesn't anyone see this besides myself? We can only know God by obeying and following Jesus Christ alone! The Holy Spirit and Christ within us will help us see Him. This is where faith comes in. We know only in partial and hope in God by trusting him and his son. So, we obey Jesus in our faith and it is complete by the inclusion of the Holy Spirit in us. Where is there insufficiency? Can we walk in this way?

The best place for the temple of God is within us, as Jesus said it is within us. Fellowship starts within us, so God's church is within us. Man's theologies, institutional churches and their doctrines are not like the personal relationships of following Jesus alone that we must have with God to have his fellowship and church within us, correct?

Sorry to be long winded. Thanks to anyone able to read through.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

twob4me

Shark bait hoo ha ha
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2003
48,618
28,094
59
Here :)
✟260,430.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
~~~~~~~~~~~~MOD HAT ON!!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Just removed a few posts for Flaming. A further cleaning may take place. If you notice a post of yours missing it was removed in the clean up.

Please STOP with the Flaming! Remember part of the Flame rule states:

Flaming
●
Please treat all members with respect and courtesy through civil dialogue. Refrain from insulting, inflammatory, or goading remarks. When you disagree, remember to address the content of the post and not the poster personally.

So you should be treating all members with RESPECT and COURTESY through CIVIL dialogue. If you find that you disagree with someone you are to address the CONTENT of the post NOT the poster personally. Which means you are to refrain from using insulting, Flaming and or Goading remarks.

If this continues the tread will be closed permanently and those involved may find themselves with staff actions.

~~~~~~~~~~~~MOD HAT OFF!!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

It is a misrepresentation of annihilationism to say that the complete and utter total destruction of the wicked is nothing for the wicked to fear, that there is no consequence for sin. I don't think that you really believe that being absolutely destroyed is really no consequence at all. If there were no consequence for sin, then why are they destroyed at all? Can you develop this better for me?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.