• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Is Normal Lust a sin? Scripture please.

faster_jackrabbit

IPU Stable Hand
Mar 10, 2006
12,791
408
Houston Texas vicinity
✟37,566.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
In other words, you don't have a source. (Unbiased, please. No anti-porn or religious sites.)
http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~ad361896/anne/cease/rapestatisticspage.html
this one is just rape: http://www.azrapeprevention.org/stats/index.htm

How many sources do you need to convince you? What would be unbiased-only those yo agree with?

Here's another on rape only: http://www.rainn.org/statistics/vic...ml?PHPSESSID=3df43b58dbd07f97d1de0dc8d5b23d32
This one is worse:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/svfacts.htm

Is there such a thing as a "pro-porn" site?
 
Upvote 0

faster_jackrabbit

IPU Stable Hand
Mar 10, 2006
12,791
408
Houston Texas vicinity
✟37,566.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
This is someone's private page at a university, not an official university page.

It doesn't say where the stats came from.
From this site: "According to the 1998 National Violence Against Women Survey the lifetime prevalence of rape among women is 17.6% and among men is 3.0% (using a definition of rape that includes forced vaginal, oral, and anal intercourse.)".

This is not 1 in 3, which would be 33.33 percent.
How many sources do you need to convince you? What would be unbiased-only those yo agree with?
No, that would be a bias in my direction.
These last two are more what I would consider unbiased.

Note that the rainn site, like all except the first hysteria link, directly contradicts your "1 in 3" claim. It is 1 in 6, half what you state.
rainn link said:
One out of every six American women have been the victims of an attempted or completed rape in their lifetime (14.8% completed rape; 2.8% attempted rape). This is according to the Prevalence, Incidence and Consequences of Violence Against Women Survey (PDF, 305KB), National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998.
Note that unlike the crusader site, a source is provided.

It was the 1 in 3 number that we were balking at, not that there are a lot of rapes.
Is there such a thing as a "pro-porn" site?
I wasn't asking for "pro-porn". That's a bias too. I was asking for unbiased. Anything coming from a anti-anything or pro-anything site is inherently biased.
 
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This is someone's private page at a university, not an official university page.

It doesn't say where the stats came from.

From this site: "According to the 1998 National Violence Against Women Survey the lifetime prevalence of rape among women is 17.6% and among men is 3.0% (using a definition of rape that includes forced vaginal, oral, and anal intercourse.)".

This is not 1 in 3, which would be 33.33 percent.

No, that would be a bias in my direction.

These last two are more what I would consider unbiased.

Note that the rainn site, like all except the first hysteria link, directly contradicts your "1 in 3" claim. It is 1 in 6, half what you state.

Note that unlike the crusader site, a source is provided.

It was the 1 in 3 number that we were balking at, not that there are a lot of rapes.

I wasn't asking for "pro-porn". That's a bias too. I was asking for unbiased. Anything coming from a anti-anything or pro-anything site is inherently biased.
Those are rape statistics, not sexual assault. My uninformed guess would be there a lot more sexual assaults than rapes... seeing that rape is a subset of sexual assault and not vice versa.
 
Upvote 0

faster_jackrabbit

IPU Stable Hand
Mar 10, 2006
12,791
408
Houston Texas vicinity
✟37,566.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Those are rape statistics, not sexual assault. My uninformed guess would be there a lot more sexual assaults than rapes... seeing that rape is a subset of sexual assault and not vice versa.
Okay. What is the unbiased source for the 1 in 3 number then?
 
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Okay. What is the unbiased source for the 1 in 3 number then?
Apparently there is no unbiased source to please you. Just for the sake of argument let's say it's one out of six. Does that make you feel better? Does that make you want to go out and praise the virtues of sexual exploitation because 5 out 6 women aren't affected by it?
 
Upvote 0

faster_jackrabbit

IPU Stable Hand
Mar 10, 2006
12,791
408
Houston Texas vicinity
✟37,566.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Apparently there is no unbiased source to please you.
So where did the number come from? Do you admit that the person who put up that web site just made it up?

The other number had unbiased sources.
Just for the sake of argument let's say it's one out of six. Does that make you feel better? Does that make you want to go out and praise the virtues of sexual exploitation because 5 out 6 women aren't affected by it?
What gave you that impression? My complaint was about exaggeration, not that the problem didn't exist.

Besides, this started out as a tirade against the adult industry. What percentage of these cases are directly attributable to the adult industry, as opposed to the entertainment industry or the advertising industry? Or society itself?

If people crusade against the adult industry and try to eliminate it, they should also be trying to eliminate advertising, movies, music videos, and television as well.
 
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So where did the number come from? Do you admit that the person who put up that web site just made it up?

The other number had unbiased sources.

What gave you that impression? My complaint was about exaggeration, not that the problem didn't exist.

Besides, this started out as a tirade against the adult industry. What percentage of these cases are directly attributable to the adult industry, as opposed to the entertainment industry or the advertising industry? Or society itself?

If people crusade against the adult industry and try to eliminate it, they should also be trying to eliminate advertising, movies, music videos, and television as well.
Why would my opinion where that site got its statistics be relevant? I have seen that statistic more than once from other sources. Why quibble over numbers? Does it really matter whether it's 1 in 3 that are raped, or 1-3 that are sexually assaulted? Either way 1 in 3 women in this country are sexually exploited in a physical manner, dehumanized, abused, reduced to objects... however you feel comfortable characterizing it... at least half of which are raped (meaning penetrated) and the rest are just as traumatized. How many others are not physically assaulted but suffer this objectification in other ways?
How fascinating that you would argue the details and miss the meaning.
 
Upvote 0

faster_jackrabbit

IPU Stable Hand
Mar 10, 2006
12,791
408
Houston Texas vicinity
✟37,566.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Why would my opinion where that site got its statistics be relevant? I have seen that statistic more than once from other sources. Why quibble over numbers? Does it really matter whether it's 1 in 3 that are raped, or 1-3 that are sexually assaulted? Either way 1 in 3 women in this country are sexually exploited in a physical manner, dehumanized, abused, reduced to objects... however you feel comfortable characterizing it... at least half of which are raped (meaning penetrated) and the rest are just as traumatized. How many others are not physically assaulted but suffer this objectification in other ways?
How fascinating that you would argue the details and miss the meaning.
Talking about missing the point, you ignored the last part of my post. Here it is again:

Besides, this started out as a tirade against the adult industry. What percentage of these cases are directly attributable to the adult industry, as opposed to the entertainment industry or the advertising industry? Or society itself?

If people crusade against the adult industry and try to eliminate it, they should also be trying to eliminate advertising, movies, music videos, and television as well.
 
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Talking about missing the point, you ignored the last part of my post. Here it is again:

Besides, this started out as a tirade against the adult industry. What percentage of these cases are directly attributable to the adult industry, as opposed to the entertainment industry or the advertising industry? Or society itself?

If people crusade against the adult industry and try to eliminate it, they should also be trying to eliminate advertising, movies, music videos, and television as well.
Did you see the cover of Paxton Quigley's book, Armed and Dangerous?
http://www.christianforums.com/t525...5-of-the-worlds-prison-population.html&page=7

"One women out of three can expect to be sexually assaulted."

And you think the "adult entertainment" industry is somehow different than advertising and media in general?

Look at what Jean Kilbourne has to say about it: http://www.jeankilbourne.com/
 
Upvote 0

faster_jackrabbit

IPU Stable Hand
Mar 10, 2006
12,791
408
Houston Texas vicinity
✟37,566.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
And you think the "adult entertainment" industry is somehow different than advertising and media in general?
I don't think it is different. I think it is a business like they are. I think it should be treated the same way they are. I think that if one is blamed for the ills of society and attacked as a target for elimination, they all should be blamed and attacked and eliminated. If the adult industry should be scrapped, so should the advertising industry and entertainment industry. Or they should all be left alone on an equal basis.
 
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I don't think it is different. I think it is a business like they are. I think it should be treated the same way they are. I think that if one is blamed for the ills of society and attacked as a target for elimination, they all should be blamed and attacked and eliminated. If the adult industry should be scrapped, so should the advertising industry and entertainment industry. Or they should all be left alone on an equal basis.
I am for that. advertising and the media are not regulated and get away with all sorts of lies and deceptions...
 
Upvote 0