Is Mohammad a prophet..why and why not?

[S Walch]

This is the only part of your lengthy post that relates in any way to my question. What is meant by exclusivity? It seems to me that whenever Christians talk about it they are saying that all other religions are false.

The Christians who walk up to me on the street, and knock on my door, and tell me God wants me to change my religion.[/font]

What country you living in btw?

Sounds like the american way of preaching the gospel..

No offense to any americans who will read that, but that just seems to be the way it comes across in the media...

 

[markie]

I don't believe Mohammed was a prophet because the Koran basically calls God a liar. There's a prophecy in there about the suffering of Jesus Christ, somebody said he prayed and God took him. Prophecy wasn't fulfilled, but God said I am the Lord I change not Mallici 3:6. So either Allah changed his mind or he lied the first time. . Muslims are always saying the bible has been corrupted but I think the reverse may be true. I don't necessarily believe all this because it is from a Gnostic website and they combined the philosophies with Christianity resulting in a mystical form of Christianity, but even the devil is right sometimes. The only way that I might think Mohammed was a prophet is if the Quran has been corrupted. According to this website Mohammed was a prophet but the Meccans corrupted his message.
http://www.anycities.com/jahtruth/scriptur.htm



The Meccans corrupted the Message that had been given to Mohammed, and the Koran, to turn people away from God's Holy Temple in Jerusalem (Psalm 138:2); which Mohammed taught his followers to turn to face and go on Pilgrimage (Haj) to; in order to promote their pagan religious site in Mecca, that was condemned by Mohammed - "Peace be upon him" and make zillions from pilgrims. In so doing they prevented the uniting of the Books, created division and hostility between all believers, by also building mosques, in direct opposition to God's Will (Sura 9:107); Mohammed's Mission and the Koran itself.

Koran Sura 9:107. And there are those who put up mosques (churches; synagogues; etc.), by way of mischief and BETRAYAL - to disunite the Believers - and in preparation for one who warred against "I AM" (Revelation 12:7) and His Messenger aforetime. They will indeed swear that their intention is nothing but good; but "I AM" (Allah) doth declare that they are certainly LIARS.

Did YOU know that the Koran COMMANDS its readers to read the Bible and keep The Covenant in the Torah? However, they do not do so because the Meccans have told them that the True Bible and Torah no longer exists, which of course is a LIE and God Himself says so in the Koran (Sura 32:23*). Only by publishing the new "King of kings' Bible", which includes the ORIGINAL Koran, can we get our brothers the moslems to know that they have to read the Bible and bring the world together, in peace, with everyone keeping The Covenant, which is God's Will (Islam in Arabic) as He says in the Bible and in the Koran and all worshipping towards His only Holy Temple, in Jerusalem, at Abraham's Station on Mt. Moriah (2 Chronicles 3:1; 1 kings 8:29-30; Genesis 22:2).

2 Chronicles 3:1 Then Solomon began to build The (Kaba) House of the "I AM" (God/Allah) at Jerusalem in mount Moriah, where [the "I AM"] appeared unto David his father, in the place that David had prepared in the threshingfloor of Ornan the Jebusite.

1 kings 8:29 That Thine eyes may be open toward this house (Kaba) night and day, [even] toward the place of which Thou hast said, My name shall be there: that Thou mayest hearken unto the prayer which Thy servant shall make toward this place (Moriah).
8:30 And hearken Thou to the supplication of Thy servant, and of Thy people Israel (those who champion God's Cause in the world), when they shall pray toward this place: and hear Thou in heaven Thy dwelling place: and when Thou hearest, forgive.

Genesis 22:2 And He (God/Allah) said, Take now thy son, thine only [son] Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.

Please read this Original Koran extract.



(click here for Koran Extract)







It is also necessary for king James' Bible students to study this ORIGINAL version of the Koran, in order to understand some Biblical things more clearly and to be able to quote the True Koran to our moslem brothers and bring the world together in peace, under The Covenant, before it is TOO late.

I have written many works on the king James' Bible and Biblical prophecy fulfillment (including The Invasion of Kuwait in Prophecy and "The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse") and much more.



CLICK HERE for list




















.
-

 

[SolomonVII]

What is meant by exclusivity? ...

If you would have tried to read what I had formerly posted with any degree of discernment at all, you would have a pretty good idea what (modern)Catholics means when they talk about exclusivity. Yet instead of conversing with the people that have taken the time to respond to you, however, you seem to be still stuck carrying on that mental argument with that Christian on you doorstep.

 

[I_are_sceptical]

If you would have tried to read what I had formerly posted with any degree of discernment at all

I guess I don't have any discernment, because your post confused me.

you would have a pretty good idea what (modern)Catholics means when they talk about exclusivity

For two-thirds of my life I have belonged to a non-Christian religion, and I was Protestant before that. Catholic ideas do not come as naturally to me as they do to you.

Yet instead of conversing with the people that have taken the time to respond to you

What response? You still haven't answered my question. What's exclusivity?

you seem to be still stuck carrying on that mental argument with that Christian on you doorstep.

That's why I joined CF - to get the Christians on my doorstep to prove their position.

 

[I_are_sceptical]

S Walch, you're right. I live in the United States.

 

[mli3]

Hi Mli3!
I can see some sincerity in your question, hence i'll tell you few things abiout Mohemmed and then you can deicide. what I will say is not by no means everything about mohhemed.

• a prophet is like a messenger from God
• the messenger should pass on the message of his King, Queen, God...or whoever that send him.

Now let us look at the god of Islam who sent Mohammed as a prophet.

• he refers to women as "lacking mind and religion", meaning they are not as holy or wise as men.
• if a moslem man washes before prayers, two things can make him unclean again...a dog or a waman passing by him!
• in their "heaven", a man shall have 70 virgins to have sex with a day. they can have sex with children in that heaven and these children are the sons of the unbelievers, that is non moslems.
• in their heave, they can drink wine...etc and have all sortsof materialistic things.
• Mohemmed himself got married to a 9 years old child.
• Mohammed got married to more than 40 women. If you want to read about his sexual immorality, there a book written by a famous moslem female writer, i thinks it's called " Zawgat el nabi" arabic for "the wives of the prophet". she was attemting to exalt him

Unfortunately i have to go now. but I'll try to come back and explain abit more about it. feel free to private message me.

Thanks for polite way of asking.....
First\some of the written above is not true and the others r being misunderstandable((I donot know if the Grammar is correct)) ...It sounds from ur name that you r arabian man...if u r arabian or at least know arabic .. please tell me .. so I can exceplan the answers more freely..o.k.

Then ,I want u please to translate what I will send u into Arabic...

For all of you.. The Prophet Mohammad peace be upon him did not married 40 women ((not because that the writer of the book u metioned Farid is muslim..every thing she mentions will be true)).

((they can have sex with children in that heaven and these children are the sons of the unbelievers, that is non moslems.))prove it please...

 

[mli3]

I guess there are different revelations, but they cannot contradict each other as is the case with Islam. Jesus can't be the son of God and not be the son of God. I just don't see how something can be true and not be true at the same time, it can't. Not in this case anyway, either he was or he wasn't.

What do you mean...???

 

[mli3]

I really want to ask u .....How do u believe in 4 books...I mean different books of the bible...how can u decide which one is the right one?

And please I want u to ask the religious men ..what is the key to enter the Paradise?

Tell me please ..I know that u go to church on sunday...which is tomorrow...

I will be waiting........

These are the questions..Where r the answers...

For the first one I dont think there will be a convinced answer!!!

 

[Bevlina]

You wouldn't be convinced mli3 at whatever we said.
But, I can answer these questions.
You mention 4 books in the Bible... I take it the 4 Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Well, they are easy for us to understand because they all agree with one another.
What is the key to enter Paradise?
Through belief that Jesus is the Son of God and that He was born, lived and died for our salvation.
He is the Way, the Truth and the Life. NOBODY can go to God unless they go through Jesus, and pray in His Name, and believe in Jesus.
Ad, there is NO need to say "Pbuh" in respect of Jesus Name because, Jesus is the Prince Of Peace.

 

[zoe_uu]

take it the 4 Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Well, they are easy for us to understand because they all agree with one another.

Don't some scholars believe the 4 Gospels agree with each other because basically they were all copied from one source? It's pretty much agreed upon that they were not written at the same time, so this is plausible. I'm not trying to argue here, just maybe show you why non-Christians have a hard time believing they all agree with each other by some miracle or act of God.

 

[SolomonVII]

Don't some scholars believe the 4 Gospels agree with each other because basically they were all copied from one source? It's pretty much agreed upon that they were not written at the same time, so this is plausible. I'm not trying to argue here, just maybe show you why non-Christians have a hard time believing they all agree with each other by some miracle or act of God.

Many scholars believe this to be true of the three synoptic gospels. Basically, these scholars believe that these three gospel writers had access to a common source called 'Q', and that Luke and Matthew also had access to Mark's gospel as well.
The Gospel of John, however, presents the gospel story from a very totally different perspective. Even if he did have access to the other gospels, the influence of any of any of the other gospels is not so apparent for John.

We should try to keep Belvina's comments in context, however. The point that she was making was in response to posts that implied that there were four different versions about what happend to Jesus.

And what is being contended is not that the gospels are the same by way of a miracle, but that the gospels are essentially the same because the are all eyewitness accounts of the historical life, death and resurrection of Jesus.

 

[Bevlina]

Exactly correct solomon. All were eyewitnesses of the events. And, they were friends of Jesus.

 

[Farid]

Muhammad is the prophet of Islam. Why is there a question about this? I accept him as a prophet of Islam, doesn't mean I'm Muslim, but I can respect the Islamic religion.

to respect something, it means that you respect its values and principles. Now if you respect the idea that a man mnarries four women, and have sex with 70 virgings a day in heaven, and have sex with children in heaven, trying to convert people to islam, by talking to them, then by forcing then, or by fighting them if they dont accept it...etc then you truly respect islam.

 

[Muslim]

to respect something, it means that you respect its values and principles. Now if you respect the idea that a man mnarries four women, and have sex with 70 virgings a day in heaven, and have sex with children in heaven, trying to convert people to islam, by talking to them, then by forcing then, or by fighting them if they dont accept it...etc then you truly respect islam.

Your views of Islam and the teachings of the prophet Muhammad are very misconstrued. As for having sex with 70 virgins in heaven, that is the perverted view that Chrisitans put on Islam these days. As if all Muslims cant wait until they die so that they can have sex with 70 virgins. These 70 virgins that you refer to are in fact wives/husbands for the martyrs in Islam. Not everyone gets this reward. And this is something that Muslims do not constantly think about the way Christians constantly do. This is a reward for those who are martyrs, and in Islam that is the highest honor. Being a martyr, not receiving 72 virgins. Because receiving 72 virgins compares nothing with instantly going to heaven and being close to the throne of God. And a martyr also gets to intervene for 70 of their family members on the day of judgement who would have otherwise gone to hell. As for having sex with children in heaven. There is no basis for this in Islam, and this is a lie perpertrated by the enemies of Islam to discredit the prophet Muhammad. As for forcing people to convert to Islam and fighting against them. The prophet Muhammad never forced anyone to convert to Islam. When the pagan Meccans stole the property of the Muslims who were living in Medina. Allah gave the command to fight them because the pagans were oppressing the Muslims and while fighting is bad, oppression is worse. So the Muslims defeated the Pagans at Badr against incredible odds, and then what did the prophet Muhammad do with his captives? He did not force them to convert, nor did he kill them. But instead he let them go free if they could teach 10 children how to read. So please do not try to spread lies about Islam to try and discredit it in the eyes of others.

 

[Montalban]

Don't some scholars believe the 4 Gospels agree with each other because basically they were all copied from one source?

No, there's a belief that two/three do, and that this source is sometimes referred to as the "Lost Gospel of Q"

The for and against cases can be found at
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q.html

It's pretty much agreed upon that they were not written at the same time, so this is plausible. I'm not trying to argue here, just maybe show you why non-Christians have a hard time believing they all agree with each other by some miracle or act of God.

Perhaps they hear poor information by Christians and accept that the Christians they hear from actually know what they're talking about.

Most people accept that because all four are talking about the same events, that they should agree... if they didn't then that would be criticised by the people you refer to, as well! You can't win either way; if they all disagreed - there'd be trouble. Because they do tend to agree... they're copied!

 

[Montalban]

Your views of Islam and the teachings of the prophet Muhammad are very misconstrued. As for having sex with 70 virgins in heaven, that is the perverted view that Chrisitans put on Islam these days.

Why do you guys continue to say these 'it's a lie' statements when it's so clearly taught!
Surah Ar-Rahman
55: 69
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
70
Therein (gardens) will be fair (wives) good and beautiful;
71
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
72
Houris (beautiful, fair females) restrained in pavilions;
73
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
74
Whom no man or jinn yatmithhunna (has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse) before them.
75
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
76
Reclining on green cushions and rich beautiful mattresses.
77
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
78
Blessed be the Name of your Lord (Allah), the Owner of Majesty and Honour.

As if all Muslims cant wait until they die so that they can have sex with 70 virgins. These 70 virgins that you refer to are in fact wives/husbands for the martyrs in Islam. Not everyone gets this reward.

This is true. The only way you can be guaranteed is to be 'martyred' that is, like in a suicide bombing.

And this is something that Muslims do not constantly think about the way Christians constantly do.

As Christians don't believe this, most wouldn't even be aware of the concept, so you've got that wrong!

This is a reward for those who are martyrs, and in Islam that is the highest honor. Being a martyr, not receiving 72 virgins. Because receiving 72 virgins compares nothing with instantly going to heaven and being close to the throne of God. And a martyr also gets to intervene for 70 of their family members on the day of judgement who would have otherwise gone to hell.

Intervention? That's something I've not heard and is very interesting. What verses?

As for having sex with children in heaven. There is no basis for this in Islam,

You have in heaven the chance of being with your wife, and if she's a child, you're with her.
Plus the houris are permanently viriginal (though not neceesarily children) in that they become virigins again after you have sex with them.

and this is a lie perpertrated by the enemies of Islam to discredit the prophet Muhammad. As for forcing people to convert to Islam and fighting against them. The prophet Muhammad never forced anyone to convert to Islam.

That's another of your 'just-so' statements. Why did he call Moslems to fight against non-believers? You're now in a logical bind because either you admit he didn't, and that's easily shown by the verses we can quote, or that he did, but that people disobeyed him!

When the pagan Meccans stole the property of the Muslims who were living in Medina. Allah gave the command to fight them because the pagans were oppressing the Muslims and while fighting is bad, oppression is worse. So the Muslims defeated the Pagans at Badr against incredible odds, and then what did the prophet Muhammad do with his captives? He did not force them to convert, nor did he kill them. But instead he let them go free if they could teach 10 children how to read. So please do not try to spread lies about Islam to try and discredit it in the eyes of others

Do you have sources for your version?
"The Muslims went on killing them and taking prisoners. 70 pagans met their death, and the Muslims took from them 70 prisoners. History preserved in its records only fifth of the names out of the 70 pagan loses. Twenty [2] or twenty two [3] of them died at Ali's hand."
http://www.al-islam.org/history/history/badr.html
"Out of the seventy prisoners two, 'Uqbh and Nadr Ibn Harith, were put to death and the rest brought to Medina as captives. The captives included 'Abbas (one of the uncle of the Prophet), 'Aqil and Abu al-'As, the second was the brother of 'Ali ('Ali was among the most reputed companion of the Prophet and also the fourth Caliph) and the third, the son-in-law of the Prophet."
http://www.geocities.com/badr_313/battle.htm
One Muslim site says that Muhammed ordered the execution of the two men...
On their way back to Madinah, at a large sand hill, the Prophet ...divided the spoils equally among the fighters after he had taken Al-Khums (one-fifth). When they reached As-Safra', he ordered that two of the prisoners should be killed.
http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/0005.htm


In another instance towards PoWs...
Bukhari 5.448
... When the Prophet returned from the (battle) of Al-Khandaq (i.e. Trench) and laid down his arms and took a bath Gabriel came to him while he (i.e. Gabriel) was shaking the dust off his head, and said, "You have laid down the arms?" By Allah, I have not laid them down. Go out to them (to attack them)." The Prophet said, "Where?" Gabriel pointed towards Bani Quraiza. So Allah's Apostle went to them (i.e. Banu Quraiza) (i.e. besieged them). They then surrendered to the Prophet's judgment but he directed them to Sad to give his verdict concerning them. Sad said, "I give my judgment that their warriors should be killed, their women and children should be taken as captives, and their properties distributed."
Not only were these guys allies of Muhammed, but Muhammed also (after they'd surrendered to him) presided over their massacre.
"He decided that all the able-bodied male persons belonging to the tribe should be killed, women and children taken prisoners and their wealth divided among the Muslim fighters. The Prophet ... accepted his judgement saying that Sa'd had adjudged by the Command of Allaah."
http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/0005.htm

Why do Moslems here continually defend their religion by stating everyone else are liars. When the facts are presented do they recant...? Even when the Suras are laid before them.

 

[Farid]

These 70 virgins that you refer to are in fact wives/husbands for the martyrs in Islam. Not everyone gets this reward.

This is why alot of muslims are eager to kill themselves and others with them, because they will get what other cannot get, the 70 virgins.

The prophet Muhammad never forced anyone to convert to Islam... So the Muslims defeated the Pagans at Badr against incredible odds, and then what did the prophet Muhammad do with his captives? He did not force them to convert, nor did he kill them. But instead he let them go free if they could teach 10 children how to read.

The simple proof that islam forced it way into the world is what happen in history. When the islamic army was capable to conquoring, they entered the country during the Fath (Opening, of the country) and then after defeating the people of this country, 3 options are offered, they convert to islam, they pay the Gezia (tax) which was disabling, or be killed by the sword. as for the battle of badr, teaching 10 children how to write was a smart political decisin from mohamed, as to gain more intellectual power when his religion was still growing.

 

[Muslim]

Why do you guys continue to say these 'it's a lie' statements when it's so clearly taught!
Surah Ar-Rahman
55: 69
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
70
Therein (gardens) will be fair (wives) good and beautiful;
71
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
72
Houris (beautiful, fair females) restrained in pavilions;
73
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
74
Whom no man or jinn yatmithhunna (has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse) before them.
75
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
76
Reclining on green cushions and rich beautiful mattresses.
77
Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny?
78
Blessed be the Name of your Lord (Allah), the Owner of Majesty and Honour.

I'm not denying that some Muslims will get 72 wives in paradise. I'm just referring to those Christians who make it seem as if every Muslim will get 72 virgins who are considered concubines. This is what I'm saying is untrue.

This is true. The only way you can be guaranteed is to be 'martyred' that is, like in a suicide bombing.

Seeing as how suicide is forbidden to Muslims and as how there were never any suicide car bombings during the time of the prophet Muhammad, this is obviously not true. All you are doing now is just proving to me that your hatred towards Islam is based on the actions of certain Muslims today.

As Christians don't believe this, most wouldn't even be aware of the concept, so you've got that wrong!

Are you kidding me? Who doesn't know about the concept of martyrdom in Islam among the Christians. Especially since it's mentioned so many times on news networks as well as other television programs.

Intervention? That's something I've not heard and is very interesting. What verses?

This concept is not referred to in the Quran but there are many haddiths concerning it. Heres one

Book 14, Number 2516:Narrated AbudDarda':The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: The intercession of a martyr will be accepted for seventy members of his family.

You have in heaven the chance of being with your wife, and if she's a child, you're with her.
Plus the houris are permanently viriginal (though not neceesarily children) in that they become virigins again after you have sex with them.

While some men will be with their wives, they will not be children. The prophet Muhammad told us that everyone will be 33 years of age in paradise, both men and women. And as for the houris staying permanently virgins, you have no proof for this whatsoever. In fact I have never even heard of this anywhere. Bring me concrete proof or otherwise dont bother replying.

That's another of your 'just-so' statements. Why did he call Moslems to fight against non-believers? You're now in a logical bind because either you admit he didn't, and that's easily shown by the verses we can quote, or that he did, but that people disobeyed him!

First of all the verses in the Quran referring to attacking unbelievers were revealed during certain periods of conflict between the Pagan arabs and the Muslims. It is not generally referring to all non-Muslims throughout all time. You have to realize that certain verses in the Quran are referring to a specific period, just like certain verses in the Bible are. It is like me saying that Christians are commanded to kill their children because God commanded Abraham to kill Isaac.

Do you have sources for your version?
"The Muslims went on killing them and taking prisoners. 70 pagans met their death, and the Muslims took from them 70 prisoners. History preserved in its records only fifth of the names out of the 70 pagan loses. Twenty [2] or twenty two [3] of them died at Ali's h

and."
http://www.al-islam.org/history/history/badr.html
"Out of the seventy prisoners two, 'Uqbh and Nadr Ibn Harith, were put to death and the rest brought to Medina as captives. The captives included 'Abbas (one of the uncle of the Prophet), 'Aqil and Abu al-'As, the second was the brother of 'Ali ('Ali was among the most reputed companion of the Prophet and also the fourth Caliph) and the third, the son-in-law of the Prophet."
http://www.geocities.com/badr_313/battle.htm
One Muslim site says that Muhammed ordered the execution of the two men...
On their way back to Madinah, at a large sand hill, the Prophet ...divided the spoils equally among the fighters after he had taken Al-Khums (one-fifth). When they reached As-Safra', he ordered that two of the prisoners should be killed.
http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/0005.htm

While it is true that the pagans suffered about 70 casualties, and there were about 70 prisoners, none of the prisoners were killed. The sources which you used are internet websites that are based on the knowledge of whoever wrote those websites. They didn't even list their sources in haddith or quran. There is no evidence therefore I cannot accept their website as being accurate. As for the prophet Muhammad sparing the lives of his uncle and close relatives. He did do this, but he did not make an exception with them. His declaration was for all of the prisoners, not just his family. When it came to matters of religion he did not favour his family. He even told us Muslims that his mother was in hell as well as his uncle Abu Talib, whom the prophet loved very much.

In another instance towards PoWs...
Bukhari 5.448
... When the Prophet returned from the (battle) of Al-Khandaq (i.e. Trench) and laid down his arms and took a bath Gabriel came to him while he (i.e. Gabriel) was shaking the dust off his head, and said, "You have laid down the arms?" By Allah, I have not laid them down. Go out to them (to attack them)." The Prophet said, "Where?" Gabriel pointed towards Bani Quraiza. So Allah's Apostle went to them (i.e. Banu Quraiza) (i.e. besieged them). They then surrendered to the Prophet's judgment but he directed them to Sad to give his verdict concerning them. Sad said, "I give my judgment that their warriors should be killed, their women and children should be taken as captives, and their properties distributed."
Not only were these guys allies of Muhammed, but Muhammed also (after they'd surrendered to him) presided over their massacre.
"He decided that all the able-bodied male persons belonging to the tribe should be killed, women and children taken prisoners and their wealth divided among the Muslim fighters. The Prophet ... accepted his judgement saying that Sa'd had adjudged by the Command of Allaah."
http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/0005.htm

Why do Moslems here continually defend their religion by stating everyone else are liars. When the facts are presented do they recant...? Even when the Suras are laid before them.

The tribe of Banu Quraiza were allies with the Muslims but they betrayed their alliance during the battle of the trench. They secretly sent out emissaries to Pagans to make an alliance with them. They promised to attack the Muslims from the rear of Medina while their homes were left unprotected. But the Muslims found out about this treachery and thanks to a strategy formulated by the prophet Muhammad, the Muslims were able to hold off the attack from the Banu Quraiza until the Pagans had been defeated. The prophet Muhammad then besieged them and gave them several chances to surrender but they continued to fight until they were defeated. At that point how can you say these people were innocent? They knowingly broke an allinance with the Muslims and then continued to fight against them. The Muslims had all right to kill them. And the judgement passed down on them was that every male who fought would be killed. Other men who were not involved in the fighting were spared. This is by no means savage or barbaric. This is justice being served for the despicable actions of the Banu Quraiza.

 

[Farid]

While some men will be with their wives, they will not be children. The prophet Muhammad told us that everyone will be 33 years of age in paradise, both men and women. And as for the houris staying permanently virgins, you have no proof for this whatsoever. In fact I have never even heard of this anywhere. Bring me concrete proof or otherwise dont bother replying.

If men will be with 70 virgins a day in heaven? What about the muslim women, what are they gonna do there? Have 70 virgin men a day?

 

[Farid]

How could a man in the age of mohamed marry a 9 years girl and have sex with her? Is not that disgusting and child abuse? What would you say about this if it happens nowadays, let alone from the "prophet" who is supposed to represent God. Also, do you think god has a brothel in heaven where muslims ought to enjoy their fleshly desires and lusts/ What sort of pure religion would teach that? Are we all blind to believe that islam is a pure and a religion from God? You don't have to answer Muslim, just hold it in and think honestly about it.