But Paul knew that Deborah had been a judge over the whole nation and that Esther had been a queen and persuaded the king to change his mind and not destroy the Jews. He also knew that Priscilla had taught Apollos, had female co-workers and gave his letter the the Romans to a woman to deliver.
He also taught that women could pray and prophesy.
What do you mean by "usurp" and how do women do this?
No, well my point was that if some people are saying that men can preach because they were created before women, then dogs were created before men, so shouldn't they be trained to preach? Answer; no, of course not, that's ludicrous.
So therefore the order of creation doesn't affect your calling and what God can ask you to do.
It's easy to be glib about what Paul knew, and historical context, but, well, Paul said what he said. We, as Christians, believe that the Bible is God's Word, and, as Jesus said "The Scripture cannot be broken."
> "What do you mean by "usurp" and how do women do this?"
Good question. I use it in the general usage sense of the English language. Look, there are some parts of the Bible that the flesh would like to discard or reinterpret, and I, as much as any man would like to ramrod some interpretation upon them, but, I don't. If we start saying that it was a different time, and different place, we may as well do that for murder, adultery, theft, etc...
One amazing influence in my Christian youth was Kathryn Kuhlman. I was edified by her ministry, but, you know what? She wasn't a real teacher, and we could go on and on about Deborah, Priscilla, etc...but, it just doesn't change what Paul said. And, Paul himself knew these people much better than we do.
AAMOF, I attended a Bible College that was administered/taught by one of Aimee Semple MacPherson's associates. He had at least preached under her, and he was quite erudite. He had a doctorate, and was fluent in Greek, Hebrew. He called Aimee the Greatest Woman (I can't remember if he called her the Greatest, or Greatest Woman) Preacher in the World. I was all for women ministering in any office in the church; I was a light to those in darkness, smugly pointing out that the first of Jesus' disciples to tell of his Resurrection were women. but, I couldn't get past this verse. I, myself, do not have a good way to integrate all of the Scriptures that we have to work with on this matter.
"No, well my point was that if some people are saying that men can preach because they were created before women, then dogs were created before men, so shouldn't they be trained to preach? Answer; no, of course not, that's ludicrous.
So therefore the order of creation doesn't affect your calling and what God can ask you to do."
MY whole point is that Paul, and we all know of what his Authority consisted, used it to bolster his argument. Paul. The New Testament Paul. Again, he doesn't just throw this stuff around. Apparently, order of creation DOES matter, to God. Do I like it? I don't care either way. Can I explain it? Oh, goodness no! Not even. But, I must yield to Paul.
It's actually an extremely small price to pay. Going, again to my youth, I was listening to a traveling evangelist who had a tent ministry. Bill Lowery, IIRC, with Christ is the Answer Ministries. This was mid-70s, and a lot of his people were Jesus Freaks, etc...saved hippies. Whenever they went to one of those Tobacco Road kind of towns, he'd tell the brothers to "Cut it off", referring to their hair. So, the question is: "Is it really so essential that a woman minister teach men?" "Can a woman not find a different way to fulfill her ministry than to contradict one Scripture?"
A woman can minister the Gospel without Usurping authority over the man. She can do it without teaching a man. Etc...
Further, I can't find a better place to add this in this post, but, Prophesying is different than teaching, and different than leading an army, as per Deborah.