Wiccan_Child
Contributor
- Mar 21, 2005
- 19,419
- 673
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- UK-Liberal-Democrats
Except Jeremiah 4 is explicitly concerned with ruin and judgement, while you're taking the meaning of one verse and transplanting it into another; Genesis uses the phrase to refer to the past, while Jeremiah speaks of the future - you're stretching Scripture around the science, when there's no actual mention of any judgement between 1:1 and 1:2, or any testament to any recreation.This is the foundation of the GAP theory. Gen 1:2 & Jeremiah 4:23 are the same. In fact there is a lot of detail in Jer ch 4 about Isreal being without forum and void.
Jeremiah 4:23 I beheld the earth, and, lo, [it was] without form, and void; and the heavens, and they [had] no light.
Semantically, the cornerstone of GAP - that 'without form and void' always refers to a prior judgement - is questionable, as the words are not used the same way throughout the Bible. The same word for 'without form' is used three times in Job in 6:18, 12:24, and 26:7, yet there is no reference to prior judgement or ruin or restoration - rather, it literally refers to a void, an expanse of empty space or a place simply devoid of any features. So, to take one use of the word and assume it's the only use of the verse, is fallacious.
There are other flaws, including rather glaring passages such as Exodus 20:11 ("For in six days the Lord made the heavens, the earth, the sea, and all that is in them" - six days, not billions of days), Romans 5:12 ("Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death came through sin, and so death spread to all because all have sinned" - yet GAP requires death to have been present for billions of years prior to the Fall), Mark 10:9 ("But at the beginning of creation God 'made them male and female" - even Jesus states that God made humans not after billions of years, but at the beginning).
In other words, the Biblical support for GAP is based on indirect references to a couple of verses, yet stands at odds to a great many others.
Undoubtedly, but that doesn't mean the world was in ruin.Maybe not where you live but it was pretty much a mess here. There is about 15 to 26 feet of muck that was left behind when the glaciers melted. Also a lot of areas were going underwater. That is where we get our coral reefs and they have done a lot of exploration looking for oil. So they know quite a bit about it with the deep pockets of the oil companies paying in the hope of finding off shore oil reserves.
Indeed, and my eternal question to you is, why do you see a correlation between science and the Bible. You've said that science teaches that "the world we live in" began 12,982 years ago, yet that isn't what science says at all. The Neolithic refers to one of many stages in the development of human culture, neither unique nor particularly special. The end of the last glacial period was not a cataclysmic event, as the real impact had receded thousands of years prior - it was the 'end' inasmuch as temperatures had slowly, gradually risen. Ice sheets receded and... that's about it.Everything in between must have had a lot of violent weather with high winds. We are getting a lot of problems with the weather with just the little tiny bit of global warming we are going though now. Ice melts and without the weight the land in some places rises up higher. There are going to be earthquakes from the big shake up. No one know the exact reason but there was a massive extinction at this time. The holocene extinction.
Perhaps you see no correlation between science and the Bible, but I do. I find it all very interesting.
Upvote
0