Both have been conclusively demonstrated.
I watched the latest videos and documantaries abou the subjects, and I haven`t seen anything. Maybe you`ve read something else
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Both have been conclusively demonstrated.
But it's no the very first theory about gravity in the world. It's not a theory or a hypothesis. It's an idea. A quite rambling and very difficult to prove idea.
Seriously: what would an experiment to show this look like?
Rub a strain of cotton and see if when you`re finger moves closer and closer, the speed of the attraction turns faster
That's. Not. Gravity. That's friction.
And you mean a string of cotton, not a strain of cotton. Or this a language thing between English and Norwegian?
Journal articles.I watched the latest videos and documantaries abou the subjects, and I haven`t seen anything. Maybe you`ve read something else
Great glory for such an achievement; only embarrassment for your insistence on basing your ideas upon easily correctible ignorance. The internet abounds with quality explanations on gravity, pitched at all kinds of educational levels. There is no excuse for not making use of these to correct your misunderstanding and missing knowledge.No glory for coming up with the very first theory about gravity in the world
Gravity is not magnetism.I disagree, you add energy when you rub the "string" of cotton, so the nucleons starts to spin energy around it`s core. Like a magnet. I always wondered how a magnet worked, it`s where from I got the idea. Sorry my bad english yes![]()
Journal articles.
I think documentaries on tv is a little more updated,
it`s popular researchers about the latest theories about everything. You prefer to read journals perhaps, no big deal
I disagree, you add energy when you rub the "string" of cotton, so the nucleons starts to spin energy around it`s core. Like a magnet. I always wondered how a magnet worked, it`s where from I got the idea. Sorry my bad english yes![]()
Curvature of space hasn`t been proven, I think. This "fabric" of space they talk about, it isn`t proven. It`s only been speculated about because something holds galaxies together
| Year(s) | Measurement / Experiment | Observable | Why This Is Curvature-Only |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1915 | Mercury perihelion advance | Excess orbital precession | Requires geodesic deviation from curved spacetime |
| 1919 | Solar light deflection | Angular bending of starlight | Null geodesics deviate only if spacetime is curved |
| 1964–1975 | Shapiro time delay | Radar signal delay | Light propagation altered by curved geometry |
| 1967–present | Binary pulsars | Orbital decay & relativistic timing | Strong-field curvature + nonlinear GR dynamics |
| 1970s–present | VLBI light deflection | Precise solar light bending | Direct measurement of spacetime curvature |
| 1980s–present | Lunar Laser Ranging | Tidal orbital deviations | Measures tidal curvature, not potential |
| 2004–2011 | Gravity Probe B | Gyroscope precession | Spin transport in curved spacetime |
| 2015–present | LIGO / Virgo / KAGRA | Gravitational waves | Propagating spacetime curvature itself |
| 2016–present | LAGEOS / LARES | Frame-dragging precession | Curvature from spacetime rotation |
| 2019–present | Event Horizon Telescope | Black hole shadow | Strong-field curvature near horizon |
| 2020s | Pulsar Timing Arrays | Stochastic GW background | Large-scale curvature fluctuations |
And @Kjelete any decent documentary would have told you about many of those things, including how they were measured.
Year(s) Measurement / Experiment Observable Why This Is Curvature-Only 1915 Mercury perihelion advance Excess orbital precession Requires geodesic deviation from curved spacetime 1919 Solar light deflection Angular bending of starlight Null geodesics deviate only if spacetime is curved 1964–1975 Shapiro time delay Radar signal delay Light propagation altered by curved geometry 1967–present Binary pulsars Orbital decay & relativistic timing Strong-field curvature + nonlinear GR dynamics 1970s–present VLBI light deflection Precise solar light bending Direct measurement of spacetime curvature 1980s–present Lunar Laser Ranging Tidal orbital deviations Measures tidal curvature, not potential 2004–2011 Gravity Probe B Gyroscope precession Spin transport in curved spacetime 2015–present LIGO / Virgo / KAGRA Gravitational waves Propagating spacetime curvature itself 2016–present LAGEOS / LARES Frame-dragging precession Curvature from spacetime rotation 2019–present Event Horizon Telescope Black hole shadow Strong-field curvature near horizon 2020s Pulsar Timing Arrays Stochastic GW background Large-scale curvature fluctuations
Then there are the Hipparcos and Gaia missions which accurately mapped star positions.
Year(s) Measurement / Experiment Observable Why This Is Curvature-Only 1915 Mercury perihelion advance Excess orbital precession Requires geodesic deviation from curved spacetime 1919 Solar light deflection Angular bending of starlight Null geodesics deviate only if spacetime is curved 1964–1975 Shapiro time delay Radar signal delay Light propagation altered by curved geometry 1967–present Binary pulsars Orbital decay & relativistic timing Strong-field curvature + nonlinear GR dynamics 1970s–present VLBI light deflection Precise solar light bending Direct measurement of spacetime curvature 1980s–present Lunar Laser Ranging Tidal orbital deviations Measures tidal curvature, not potential 2004–2011 Gravity Probe B Gyroscope precession Spin transport in curved spacetime 2015–present LIGO / Virgo / KAGRA Gravitational waves Propagating spacetime curvature itself 2016–present LAGEOS / LARES Frame-dragging precession Curvature from spacetime rotation 2019–present Event Horizon Telescope Black hole shadow Strong-field curvature near horizon 2020s Pulsar Timing Arrays Stochastic GW background Large-scale curvature fluctuations
Apparently no gravity is just a continuous free fall with no landing hence , floating. In other words, breaking a barrier. So gravity is not having the ability to break that barrier hence, grounded.I tried to find out some years ago how gravity really works, why it attracts other objects:
I think it`s like if you take a magnet, it absorbs energy and it sends it in orbits around the core. Like waves, but everything within the wave get`s pulled in to the center, because the gravity-waves penerates your body or object. The closer to to core, the shorter the wave is and you get pulled in-wards faster and faster as the wave get`s shorter.
In empty air, vacuum, there`s no air above it to push it down, so it falls more or less freely. Do you get my idea, the gravity-ripples penetrates the body and psychially pulls it to the center of the magnet:
View attachment 375078
I was originally made fun of for this idea, they ridiculed me. But you can actually observe that if you rub a strain of cotton for example, the closer your finger is to the strain of cotton, the faster it pulls into your finger. I made a basic picture to show