JimB
Legend
- Jul 12, 2004
- 26,337
- 1,595
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
The main objection I hear to our evangelical/fundamentalist/literalist interpretation of hell is that it is overkill. The idea that God would not only punish the wicked—including the guy who loves his wife and children, works hard, gives to the poor but who has never “accepted Jesus as his personal savior” (i.e., never walked the aisle or raised his hand for salvation like we are supposed to do), right along with Hitler and Stalin—but is going to be tortured endlessly, painfully, night and day, on and on, forever and ever, ages upon ages for something he failed to do in this brief snap of the fingers we call life, simply does not compute with the Apostle John’s repeated statement that “God is love.”
In a recent discussion with a friend (a believer in Christ, incidentally) who is struggling with the idea of hell, he said to me, “I can understand that love may discipline, even punish, a wrongdoer, but love does not torture them—forever.”
Nothing I said to the contrary was convincing to him and I have to admit, he has made me take another look at the metaphors the Bible uses for hell. At the moment, I am convinced only that hell, whatever and wherever it is, is a horrible place I would not want anyone to be.
~Jim
In a recent discussion with a friend (a believer in Christ, incidentally) who is struggling with the idea of hell, he said to me, “I can understand that love may discipline, even punish, a wrongdoer, but love does not torture them—forever.”
Nothing I said to the contrary was convincing to him and I have to admit, he has made me take another look at the metaphors the Bible uses for hell. At the moment, I am convinced only that hell, whatever and wherever it is, is a horrible place I would not want anyone to be.
~Jim
When you gonna wake up and strengthen the things that remain? ~Bob Dylan, 1979
Last edited:
Upvote
0