Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Tremont Baptist Church ended their Sunday evening services with that hymn back in 1975 when I attended it. I wonder if they still do.
Yes, there were a number of extremely popular hymns at various times. The Battle Hymn of the Republic was probably one of the most popular hymn during the Civil War. It, of course, borrowed the music from John Brown's Body Lies A-Molderin in the Grave.It turns out, it's an English Baptist hymn in origin. But it must have been widely popular at one time.
But is the hymn Calvinist?Yes, there were a number of extremely popular hymns at various times. The Battle Hymn of the Republic was probably one of the most popular hymn during the Civil War. It, of course, borrowed the music from John Brown's Body Lies A-Molderin in the Grave.
The Battle Hymn of the Republic probably does not seem to be at all heretical given the fact that we are now so familiarized with it, as with other hymns, that words no longer carry much, if any, meaning.But is the hymn Calvinist?
It doesn't seem too heretical
Interesting perspective on the Battle Hymn, but that is a song more for the USA than for Australia, here we don't sing it much - if ever.The Battle Hymn of the Republic probably does not seem to be at all heretical given the fact that we are now so familiarized with it, as with other hymns, that words no longer carry much, if any, meaning.
Here is the theological framework. Although it is not closely related to the Calvinism of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, it is firmly in the nineteenth-century mainstream of Reformed (e. g. Calvinist) theology.
However, if you define Calvinism as being monergism only, then there is no connection between this hymn and monergism and, moreover, this thread is misnamed. Calvinism encompasses far more than monergism. Read Calvin's Institutes and discover the breadth of his theology.
One of the lacunae in Calvinism is that of eschatology. There has never been a clearly defined eschatology within Calvinism, which is also true with many other branches of Christianity. In the nineteenth century, especially in the United States, that absence was filled by post-millenial theology, of which The Battle Hymn of the Republic is a shining example.
So, in answer to your question. The hymn is not at all monergist, but it is part and parcel of nineteenth-century American Calvinism.
Yes, the Battle Hymn is a unique relic of American history. I agree with you concerning Blest Be the Tie That Binds.Interesting perspective on the Battle Hymn, but that is a song more for the USA than for Australia, here we don't sing it much - if ever.
But Blest be the ties that bind ... now that is a possible source of Calvinist naughtiness indeed.
Perhaps I am missing something, but what exactly could be considered heretical in Battle Hymn of the Republic, at least by a Christian? Its lyrics seem fairly vague and not really favoring any particular ideology. Its apparent description of the Second Coming in the future seems like it would be considered wrong by a Full Preterist (Full Preterists claim the Second Coming has already happened, unlike Partial Preterists who, while believing most of the eschatological events have already happened, hold to the Second Coming still occurring sometime in the future), but they are as far as I can tell Full Preterists are a fairly fringe group.The Battle Hymn of the Republic probably does not seem to be at all heretical given the fact that we are now so familiarized with it, as with other hymns, that words no longer carry much, if any, meaning.
Here is the theological framework. Although it is not closely related to the Calvinism of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, it is firmly in the nineteenth-century mainstream of Reformed (e. g. Calvinist) theology.
However, if you define Calvinism as being monergism only, then there is no connection between this hymn and monergism and, moreover, this thread is misnamed. Calvinism encompasses far more than monergism. Read Calvin's Institutes and discover the breadth of his theology.
One of the lacunae in Calvinism is that of eschatology. There has never been a clearly defined eschatology within Calvinism, which is also true with many other branches of Christianity. In the nineteenth century, especially in the United States, that absence was filled by post-millenial theology, of which The Battle Hymn of the Republic is a shining example.
So, in answer to your question. The hymn is not at all monergist, but it is part and parcel of nineteenth-century American Calvinism.
"My eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord." is the first line of the hymn. That establishes the theological basis for the narrative which is worked out in the remainder of the hymn.Perhaps I am missing something, but what exactly could be considered heretical in Battle Hymn of the Republic, at least by a Christian? Its lyrics seem fairly vague and not really favoring any particular ideology. Its apparent description of the Second Coming in the future seems like it would be considered wrong by a Full Preterist (Full Preterists claim the Second Coming has already happened, unlike Partial Preterists who, while believing most of the eschatological events have already happened, hold to the Second Coming still occurring sometime in the future), but they are as far as I can tell Full Preterists are a fairly fringe group.
Ah, I see. I read "my eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord" as referring to the narrator saying they experienced a vision of what would happen in the future. The lyrics, by themselves, indicated to me it was talking about what would happen in the future Second Coming."My eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord." is the first line of the hymn. That establishes the theological basis for the narrative which is worked out in the remainder of the hymn.
She wrote precisely what she believed. She believed that she had personally seen the second coming of Jesus Christ to this earth. That is the heart and core of nineteenth-century American post-millennial doctrine. IOW, Jesus Christ returned personally following the abolition of slavery in the United States of America and established his personal millennial rule on earth.
If you agree with that then most Christians would be quite amazed at you. This is not Preterism at all. It is Post-Millenialism as expressed in the United States in 1860.
That is the glorious thing about history and historians. The more distant the past the greater the temptation to engage in revisionist history.Ah, I see. I read "my eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord" as referring to the narrator saying they experienced a vision of what would happen in the future. The lyrics, by themselves, indicated to me it was talking about what would happen in the future Second Coming.
However, that seems to reinforce what I noted before, that the lyrics themselves are vague enough that they'd seem to run afoul of the beliefs of few if any Christians. Perhaps the intent of them was more specifically postmillennialism (and even more specifically, United States postmillennialism around 1860 as you put it), but the lyrics themselves do not require such an interpretation.
Tremont Baptist Church ended their Sunday evening services with that hymn back in 1975 when I attended it. I wonder if they still do.
My childhood was spent attending Sunday morning services at our Presbyterian (PCUSA) church. We sat in reverential silence for each hymn, listening to the organist perform for us.
Interesting perspective on the Battle Hymn, but that is a song more for the USA than for Australia, here we don't sing it much - if ever.
But Blest be the ties that bind ... now that is a possible source of Calvinist naughtiness indeed.
Actually, there is a great multitude of Baptist church which continue to use traditional music. One of the problems with Baptist churches is their understanding of "tradition". For many, "tradition" consists of what was popular in past decades. Thus, I have observed that there are many independent Baptist churches which are KJV only simply because they view the KJV in some sort of mythological position not unlike the original Ten Commandments. These folks also heavily prefer a musical repertoire of nineteenth-century revival-style music. Fanny Crosby, the amazingly prodigious hymn writer, retains her great popularity in these circles. The musical accompaniment is typically performed by a lady from the congregation at a piano and with a brisk, lively tempo. The vocal skills of the congregation frequently leave a lot to be desired, but this lack is made up by the enthusiasm of the singing.Unfortunately I am having a hard time finding Baptist churches which still have traditional music. So if you know of any I would be interested in it. Lots of Presbyterian churches have lovely liturgies, for example IPC Birmingham, which is a PCUSA parish that has exceptionally good music.
Actually, there is a great multitude of Baptist church which continue to use traditional music. One of the problems with Baptist churches is their understanding of "tradition". For many, "tradition" consists of what was popular in past decades. Thus, I have observed that there are many independent Baptist churches which are KJV only simply because they view the KJV in some sort of mythological position not unlike the original Ten Commandments. These folks also heavily prefer a musical repertoire of nineteenth-century revival-style music. Fanny Crosby, the amazingly prodigious hymn writer, retains her great popularity in these circles. The musical accompaniment is typically performed by a lady from the congregation at a piano and with a brisk, lively tempo. The vocal skills of the congregation frequently leave a lot to be desired, but this lack is made up by the enthusiasm of the singing.
In my area of Iowa, which is primarily Lutheran and Catholic, there are a surprising number of such churches.
Those folks are, indeed, very few and far between today. The closest I would know might by the RPCNA which sings only Psalms and without instrumental accompaniment. Even that is not very close to lining out or using the shaped note hymnals. Are you familiar with the split hymnals with notes on the upper half of the page and words on the lower half such that the lyrics and the music are separate and can be mixed and matched at will. The key is the use of a single meter, usually Common Meter.What I am really looking for are Baptist churches that either use lining out or the old Southern Harmony hymnal, some of which I have found recordings of, or else whixh have choirs and organs of the sort one would expect to find in a mainline church such as a Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian or Catholic church.
I really like the tune, it is kind of stirring and hopeful, despite the terror that Stalin imposed.the Soviet national anthem
Speaking of tunes, most folks really like the ditty that F. J. Haydn cooked up for the Austrian emperor's birthday bash. See if you can recognize it.I really like the tune, it is kind of stirring and hopeful, despite the terror that Stalin imposed.
I really like the tune, it is kind of stirring and hopeful, despite the terror that Stalin imposed.
Actually, it was hardly limited to the 20th century. Tyrannies have left an enormous legacy of grandiose remains. The Incas and the Aztecs, to cite just a couple, were no slouches.Of course.
All the monstrous regimes of the 20th century tended to justify themselves by appeal to aesthetics.
Speaking of tunes, most folks really like the ditty that F. J. Haydn cooked up for the Austrian emperor's birthday bash. See if you can recognize it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?