Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
At first I thought you might mean the next stage of laziness (or efficiency): after enough further time, next will come leaving out that same apostrophe eventually. So that some day perhaps (unless computer spelling correction prevents it), the spelling y'all would eventually become yall.
French requires that a vowel be followed by a consonant in successive words... And that rule is what makes French so beautiful... Je te aime becomes Je t'aime... the pronunciation just flows off the tongue.At first I thought you might mean the next stage of laziness (or efficiency): after enough further time, next will come leaving out that same apostrophe eventually. So that some day perhaps (unless computer spelling correction prevents it), the spelling y'all would eventually become yall.
Perhaps that's will become thats, this article suggests:
The absence of a plural form of 'you' is one of the Great Failings of Modern English. Even worse, given the past usage of 'ye', 'thou and 'thee', it seems English has actually gone backwards over time. Modern 'you' has lost the ability to differentiate between singular and plural or formal from informal. Like other versions of English, Australian English got around the 'you-plural' problem by informally inventing its own versions - 'yous & 'yez' - typically in Australian bogan speech. (a 'bogan' is a 'yobbo')
As an etymological amateur I have long been aware of the (mainly) Southern US solution to you-plurality by using 'you-all' or its cousin 'y'all' in informal usage.
However... as an ardent listener to spoken English (in this case American TV and movie speech) I suspect that 'y'all'/'you all' is', in some US dialects, losing its unique status as a plural form of 'you' and is actually replacing singular 'you'.
As it turns out a couple of Dictionaries also agree with me:
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!www.dictionary.com
There is significant debate about whether y’all can ever be strictly singular (without implying a larger group, association, or network). Such examples are uncommon and judged as ungrammatical by many speakers who otherwise freely use y’all themselves. In the rare instance of singular y’all, it is best understood as a pragmatic choice to communicate friendly solidarity, or to express group membership as a speaker of Southern American English.
Definition of YOU-ALL
you —usually used in addressing two or more persons… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
: YOU —usually used in addressing two or more person
What appears to be happening is the wholesale replacement of 'you' by 'y'all' in informal (Southern US) speech. This means that 'y'all' is becoming both the singular and plural version of 'you'.
OB
You can probably thank Irish immigrants for that.
