The name is misleading and anti-Biblical -- in my opinion.You don't get it (though I suspect you do, but are pretending to be "innocent" as you say). Homo sapiens ia nothing more than the scientific designation for our species. It is a name and nothing more. But, you can continue to pretend differently. Maybe you can start by explaining how you are a "real man."
What evidence would this be?The evidence speaks for itself. Man was created.
This is just supplementary. Not to "convince" you.
The designation you guys use for Pluto came from a rigged vote from behind closed doors.I imagine its the same reasoning that leads him to think that the designation we use for Pluto is also a crushing argument against astronomy.
The name is misleading and anti-Biblical -- in my opinion.
Is that what AVET is ranting about when he mentions Pluto?!?!I imagine its the same reasoning that leads him to think that the designation we use for Pluto is also a crushing argument against astronomy.
Like that really matters.One does at least appreciate that you acknowledge that it is your opinion.
Hmmm....that sounds familiarThe designation you guys use for Pluto came from a rigged vote from behind closed doors.
IOW -- it was scientific.
I just get tired of Internet scientists telling me what is and what isn't, when they themselves are told what to think.Hmmm....that sounds familiar
Had I come on here in 2004 telling these guys Pluto is not a planet, they would have ostracized me; probably with the same words they ostracize creationists.
From behind closed doors via a rigged vote.Yes? And we have since revised the definition of "planet". So?
It is just a definition. It doesn't change what Pluto is physically.From behind closed doors via a rigged vote.
And there are three states that disagree -- not to mention the scientists who voted, "nay".
So go ahead and accept the revision if you want, but what makes science any better than the "crooks" we say are in the White House?
From behind closed doors via a rigged vote.
And there are three states that disagree -- not to mention the scientists who voted, "nay".
So go ahead and accept the revision if you want, but what makes science any better than the "crooks" we say are in the White House?
Guess yer too young to remember ole Tricky DickWhat "crooks"?
Then why vote at all?It is just a definition. It doesn't change what Pluto is physically.
We will gladly accept you into our group bro(Or have I been ostracized?)
Then why vote at all?
If that's all it is is rhetoric, what's the big deal?
And if that's all it is is air through the vocal chords, I take it you won't mind if I go ahead and consider Pluto our 9th planet?
If fact -- you'll even support my right to think that too, won't you?
(Or have I been ostracized?)
Well, I don't sit and stare at the sun like astronomers and hippies on LSD do.Who knows? A bunch of PhD's who sit in observatories and stare at objects in the sky for a living thought it was a good idea. Doesn't effect anyone but them, really.
Well, I don't sit and stare at the sun like astronomers and hippies on LSD do.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?