#ILEFTTHEGOP TRENDS AS FORMER REPUBLICANS SHARE WHY THEY 'CUT THE CORD' WITH THE PARTY

[The Barbarian]

If any person thinks that video is mocking Christianity there's a real problem with their understanding of Christ's message and our Constitution.

 

[tulc]

(snip) I wasn't trying to hurt your feelings. (snip).

No worries, you didn't. I just thought you should be aware of the rule is all.
tulc(no sense getting in trouble over something avoidable)

 

[tulc]

interesting...could you point out which parts are him "mocking the Bible"? Because I thought the things he asked were actually pretty good questions.
tulc(is just curious)

 

[FireBrimstone]

How any Christ, even a lukewarm one, could deny such a thing is beyond me.

America’s Most Biblically-Hostile U. S. President - WallBuilders

 

[FireBrimstone]

You guys have your mind's made up, so it doesn't matter what I say but despite what Obama says I'm still going to "cling to my God guns and religion"

 

[nolidad]

House Passes Resolution Formalizing Impeachment Inquiry
October 31, 20199:07 AM ET
House Passes Resolution Formalizing Impeachment Inquiry

Dec 4, 2019
WASHINGTON – The House Judiciary Committee held its first hearing Wednesday on whether President Donald Trump should be impeached.
House Judiciary committee holds Trump Impeachment hearings



See above. You know this. Why pretend that you don't?

yes we know all this!

What you fail to realize is that the subpoenas all occurred prior to 10/31 , before the house authorized impeachment hearings. Thus making tham all invalid.

Nancy on her own authority cannot convene committees to investigate impeachment. The constitution syas it belongs to the house- not just the speaker.

But you know that.

 

[tulc]

You guys have your mind's made up, so it doesn't matter what I say but despite what Obama says I'm still going to "cling to my God guns and religion"

So...that would be "I can't actually explain why I think he's "mocking the Bible" in this video but I really REALLY think he is!"?
tulc(is just trying to make sure he's understanding FireBrimstone's point)

 

[The Barbarian]

What you fail to realize is that the subpoenas all occurred prior to 10/31 , before the house authorized impeachment hearings. Thus making tham all invalid.

No, as you learned, the committee chairmen already had the power of subpoena. House rules. Same as it was when the House impeached Bill Clinton.

Why do you think the House republicans, who tried one legal maneuver after another to derail impeachment proceedings, never tried that argument?

Yep. That's why.

 

[The Barbarian]

America’s Most Biblically-Hostile U. S. President - WallBuilders

I assume that would be the president who has used most of the ten commandments like Kleenex?

The one who bragged about being able to get away with sexual assault?

The one who had to pay tens of millions of dollars in damages for defrauding people who trusted him?

The one who is such a compulsive liar that he lies even when he knows people know he's lying?

That one? I guess that would be him.

 

[FireBrimstone]

 

[The Barbarian]

Understandable...

Trump reveals he would vote for a gay presidential candidate
Trump reveals he would vote for a gay presidential candidate

But he's still the most Biblically-hostile president so far.

 

[FireBrimstone]

So...that would be "I can't actually explain why I think he's "mocking the Bible" in this video but I really REALLY think he is!"?
tulc(is just trying to make sure he's understanding FireBrimstone's point)

Cult

 

[tulc]

Cult

...did you post this in the wrong thread?
tulc(knows that happens sometimes)

 

[nolidad]

No, as you learned, the committee chairmen already had the power of subpoena. House rules. Same as it was when the House impeached Bill Clinton.

Why do you think the House republicans, who tried one legal maneuver after another to derail impeachment proceedings, never tried that argument?

Yep. That's why.

I know you are not that ignorant! But in case you are!

It was not congressional staffers that were subpoenaed but executive branch employees. And it was the executive branch who rejected the subpoenas as valid because the house had not yet approved impeachment proceedings to commence!

Yes under normal functioning of the house they have certain subpoena powers, but impeachment is not "normal" proceedings but a unique constitutional process that belongs to teh house not just the speaker! Once th ehouse voted and approves impeachiment proceedings to begin, then the speaker has authority to grant which committees will investigate, etc.etc.etc. and all th esubpoena power that goes with it.

But impeachmetns to begin must be approved by the house! But you know that!

And you need to educate yourself about teh timeline of Clintons impeachment. No subpoenas were issued by congress until after the house approved the proceedings to commence! But you know that as well.