Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Key word in my statement was "reasonably". Anything natural should reasonably be considered good.
Do you have a right to exist? Do you know if you would struggle against someone trying to take your life? If you would struggle does that not demonstrate your belief that you have a right to exist? Apply that same question to those you love...do they have a right to exist?What right to exist? You keep asserting this but have yet to show it.
Do you have a right to exist? Do you know if you would you struggle against someone trying to take your life? If you would struggle does that not demonstrate your belief that you have a right to exist? Apply that same question to those you love...do they have a right to exist?
You have a right to exist now.
But at some point back then, there was no You to hold that right. The question is, as always for this topic, when does a person begin. At conception? At some gray area time during pregnancy?
Maybe you can come up with why I should believe said right to exist?
How does responding to my question with a question answer my question (that wasn't directed at you). I didn't make a claim, I asked a question. Do you have an answer?Make your case.
How does what you have at conception, resemble a person?
How does responding to my question with a question answer my question (that wasn't directed at you). I didn't make a claim, I asked a question. Do you have an answer?
How are you certain that those qualities define personhood?Yes.
At conception and for a while after, you do not have anything remotely resembling a person. No heart beat, no brain, no form of a human body and I could go on.
So then you don't know.I can't envision a person, without a brain or heart.
But that is just me.
Really? So you believe bubonic plague, polio, smallpox, whooping cough, etc "should reasonably be considered good" because they are natural? Can't wait to see the tap dancing around this one.
You are right to say that without God you have no right to exist. If God doesn't exist, we have no transcendent rights whatsoever. Moreover, there are no reasons to view morality in a transcendent objective manner. Nothing is right or wrong, only opinions exist.
Personally I define it as a Human person that is capable of self awareness. However looking at both the legal and dictionary definition it is not a well defined concept. Please, do continue.So then you don't know.
I fail to see how there being a God changes any of this.
I'm still getting an "I really don't know" answer from you. So I'm wondering how you can justify killing something that may be a person but you aren't sure. You can't just make up a definition and call it good.Personally I define it as a Human person that is capable of self awareness. However looking at both the legal and dictionary definition it is not a well defined concept. Please, do continue.
Sorry belk but you need to take some intelligence pills....Go tell a terminal cancer patient they have a "right to exist". There is no such thing.
and you could go on with what medical evidence?Yes.
At conception and for a while after, you do not have anything remotely resembling a person. No heart beat, no brain, no form of a human body and I could go on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?