If you're a Christian and pro-choice, you're on the wrong side of the issue.

[Chriliman]

You missed his point. Words such as "begin", "then", "while", "already knew", "will" are all time based. If your assertion is that your God exists outside of any time frame, then these statements are meaningless. The existence of an individual as a zygote, foetus, infant, child or adult would be all contemporaneous. So their death would be contemporaneous with their life as well.

God is timeless, but uses time to accomplish his will, that's why he's God and not man who is only restricted to time.

I understand this is a concept that you refuse to believe is possible and that's fine for now.

 

[David4223]

MOD HAT ON

This thread has undergone a cleanup. If your post is missing, please review the CF rules before posting again.

Including -- please remember to address the content of the post and not address the character of the poster.

Please treat others as you would like to be treated.

Thank you!

MOD HAT OFF​

 

[Chad Farwell]

I am pro Choice as in...if you think the thing forming inside a pregnant woman is worthless and will contribute nothing, feel free to do with it what ever you like, call it growth or whatever, just remember you were once a growth in Your Mom, she gave you a chance

 

[Chad Farwell]

MOD HAT ON

This thread has undergone a cleanup. If your post is missing, please review the CF rules before posting again.

Including -- please remember to address the content of the post and not address the character of the poster.

Please treat others as you would like to be treated.

Thank you!

MOD HAT OFF​

i would like to be treated a whole lot better, but treatment is in the hands of those with treats

 

[Speshull Edd]

So, what if I am pro-life, but I can understand the issue with infringing on civil liberties. I guess I agree with choice, but dis agree with abortion.

What do you guys think?

 

[PapaZoom]

So, what if I am pro-life, but I can understand the issue with infringing on civil liberties. I guess I agree with choice, but dis agree with abortion.

What do you guys think?

Choice for what? You agree with choice. So do I. All pro lifers agree with people having choices. But we don't think you should have the right to make the choice to kill your two year old because you want to finish college anymore than we think you should have the right to choose to kill your unborn child (insert reason here).

Killing another human being does not fall under a civil liberty right.

 

[Speshull Edd]

Choice for what? You agree with choice. So do I. All pro lifers agree with people having choices. But we don't think you should have the right to make the choice to kill your two year old because you want to finish college anymore than we think you should have the right to choose to kill your unborn child (insert reason here).

Killing another human being does not fall under a civil liberty right.

I don't want a legalistic stance, but if I think that exactly, am I taking a legalistic stance? I think the idea of abortion is immoral, but the Lord gave us free will, so shouldn't individuals have the choice to abort? I guess I am for the option to choose but not the decision... I don't know if I am right. Maybe you can give me some scripture to reference...

 

[PapaZoom]

I don't want a legalistic stance, but if I think that exactly, am I taking a legalistic stance? I think the idea of abortion is immoral, but the Lord gave us free will, so shouldn't individuals have the choice to abort? I guess I am for the option to choose but not the decision... I don't know if I am right. Maybe you can give me some scripture to reference...

That's like saying since God gave us free will we should have the choice to kill our two year old child. Abortion kills a unborn human in the same way as killing a two year old. So are you for the option of killing a two year old but against the decision? How about Thou Shalt Not Murder? Unjustified killing is murder according to the Bible.

 

[sahjimira]

I go with psm 139