This is what the Sovereign LORD says: No foreigner uncircumcised in heart and flesh is to enter my sanctuary, not even the foreigners who live among the Israelites.
Ezekiel 44:9
That is prophetic and has yet to be fulfilled.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is what the Sovereign LORD says: No foreigner uncircumcised in heart and flesh is to enter my sanctuary, not even the foreigners who live among the Israelites.
Ezekiel 44:9
On the contrary -- it is 1000 years.
On the contrary -- it is 1000 years.
Will happen at the 2nd coming.
On the contrary Christ told those alive 2000 years ago "If I go away I WILL come AGAIN " -- 2nd coming.
And Peter said - many years AFTER the cross "13 Therefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and rest your hope fully upon the grace that is to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ; " 1 Peter 1:13
That event - still FUTURE to the time of Peter's writing!
Future to 2Thess 2:1-4
2 Thessalonians 2:1-4
Now, brethren, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, we ask you, 2 not to be soon shaken in mind or troubled, either by spirit or by word or by letter, as if from us, as though the day of Christ had come. 3 Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, 4 who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.
2 Thessalonians 2:8
And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming.
We call this man of sin [lawless one] the Antichrist. The Antichrist must come and he will be defeated at the same time that Jesus Christ returns to earth to gather His people to Himself. Jesus will destroy the Antichrist with the glory of His coming/second appearing. The Antichrist will be destroyed by Jesus' command [the breath of His mouth].
The saints on earth will be gathered to Jesus in the air when He comes to defeat Antichrist by the breath of His mouth [His command] and the brightness [glory] of His [second/final] coming.
Jesus will not gather His saints together with Him in the air until the time of His second/final appearing which will not occur until the end of time. Jesus will return to earth and gather His followers to Himself when it is time for the white throne judgment/sheep and goats judgment/etc
And apparently we both agree on that last part.
in Christ,
Bob
He was a Jew by parentage because his mother was a Jew - but he could not enter the temple or have the right of a Jew without being circumcised.
He was a Jew by parentage because his mother was a Jew - but he could not enter the temple or have the right of a Jew without being circumcised.
Sure. But where does this say he is not a Jew?
Nice, but where you do find that stated in the Bible?
The thousand years is symbolic for a long time period.
How do you know this?
Paul said it was obvious that "what matters is KEEPING the Commandments of God" 1Cor 7:19
Paul said "do we then make VOID the LAW of God by our faith? on the contrary we ESTABLISH the LAW of God" Rom3:31
Paul said the same moral law of God known to Jeremiah is "written on the mind and heart" of the saints in the NT.
Paul said that only the lost "do not submit to the LAW of God - neither indeed CAN they" Rom 8:4-8
Paul said "There REMAINS therefore a SABBATH rest for the people of God" Heb 4:9
James said "to break ONE of the Commandments is to break them ALL" James 2
In Heb 8:6-10 Paul said the Commandments at Sinai -- are Christ's Commandments.
Paul quotes from the Sabbath Commandment in Acts and in Hebrews 4 -- he never quotes the 3rd commandment against taking God's name in vain. But that is fine - since the mythical teaching "delete whatever I did not repeat" is nothing that Paul ever taught.
On the contrary -- it is 1000 years.
There is not one example in all of scripture where the Bible says such and such will happen or did happen for 70 years, or 1000 years ... and yet it means "make up whatever amount of time you feel is needed".
Not even once.
Given that irrefutable fact - and the choice of the Protestant principle of "sola scriptura" testing of all doctrine and tradition - the conclusion is inescapable.
First of all, sola scriptura is not scriptural. This doctrine of sola scriptura is not found anywhere in the Bible.
One thousand years is a symbolic number and it indicates a long time. It is not literal.
Until you read the Bible in places like Acts 17:11 and Mark 7
Acts 17:11 "they studied the scriptures daily to SEE IF those things (spoken to them by the Apostle Paul) were SO"
Mark 7
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the Commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death:
11 But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free.
12 And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother;
13 Making the Word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
Notice how the traditions of the one true nation church started by God at Sinai -- are getting hammered "sola scriptura" by Christ in Mark 7??![]()
That is not true in Rev 20
And it is not true in 2Peter 3 since Peter says " a (literal) DAY is as a 1000 years" for God and at the same time " a (literal) 1000 years is as a DAY" for God. Thus having it both ways - means it is not a timeline at all whereas that is not the case in Rev 20.
The point remains.
(Though it is unclear to me why the subject is going off to areas of prophecy)
In neither of these places does it say that all the truth about the Christian faith is contained in Scripture alone.
The context of Acts 17:11 is that these particular Jews were checking the OT Scriptures to see if what Paul was saying about the fulfillment of the prophecies about Jesus being the Messiah was true.
The context of Mark 7 is that these particular Pharisees were putting their own commandments and traditions above the commandments of God thereby negating God's commandments when they conflicted with their own.
.
One thousand years is a symbolic number and it indicates a long time. It is not literal.
That is not true in Rev 20
And it is not true in 2Peter 3 since Peter says " a (literal) DAY is as a 1000 years" for God and at the same time " a (literal) 1000 years is as a DAY" for God. Thus having it both ways - means it is not a timeline at all whereas that is not the case in Rev 20.
The point remains.
(Though it is unclear to me why the subject is going off to areas of prophecy)
Peter is not necessarily stating that a (literal) 24-hour DAY on earth for humans is the same as 1000 YEARS to God.
RE: Revelation 20
This "1000 years" is actually symbolic for the time period of the Church era on earth and it is the time period between Jesus' first coming and His second coming. There will be no more "1000 years"
Rather it shows that all doctrine and tradition is to be tested by scripture.
Even supposedly "infallible" tradition of the one true nation church started by God at Sinai.
The "proof" that the teaching was either error or was valid - came from the method that we see Jesus using in Mark 7 and the saints of Acts 17:11 using
Indeed - and Christ shows the problem via His contrast of scripture with their doctrines and traditions of error.
The inference you are pouring into the text - is without justification from the text itself.
The inference you are pouring into the text is in direct negation of the text.
The will be 1000 years just as Rev 20 states.
Jesus does not return to earth - until after the 1000 years - and then the elements a melted by the lake of fire.
Before that - Christ's return is as is stated in 1Thess 4- and the saints are caught up in the air - the resurrection of Rev 20:4-5 and that of 1thess 4 - are the same one... the "first resurrection" as the text says.
The point remains.
But I am not clear as to why we are even discussing this in the LAW and Sabbath section.
Mark and Paul were using OT Scripture. NT Scripture was not finalized at that point in time.
On the contrary -- it is 1000 years.
There is not one example in all of scripture where the Bible says such and such will happen or did happen for 70 years, or 1000 years ... and yet it means "make up whatever amount of time you feel is needed".
Not even once.
Given that irrefutable fact - and the choice of the Protestant principle of "sola scriptura" testing of all doctrine and tradition - the conclusion is inescapable.