Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
if thats your take on the bible you can get lied too.The Bible is always accurate and true. Our understanding of the Bible is limited. Science helps us to better understand the word of God. He gives us both science and the Bible.
Are you calling God a liar? The Bible is 100% accurate and true. Science can verify how accurate and true the Bible is.if thats your take on the bible you can get lied too.
Maybe God didn’t leave evidence because he wants us to have faith, not proof. If there was proof there would be no need for faithwhy are you spreading missinformation? You do know 1-2 million people walking through the desert would provide FAR MORE then the paultry little bits we find, wich isn't the amount you expect from millions of people, but from nomads wandering the desert. Not again millions. Even the jews who have a huge reason to find the stuff admit it's not there.
Why would God want us to have faith in a specific number of Jewish exodus? Its not a part of Christian faith or of Christian creeds. Jesus can be the Son of God and resurrected without any exodus ever happening.Maybe God didn’t leave evidence because he wants us to have faith, not proof. If there was proof there would be no need for faith
You can say that about the flood, the creation, the kingdoms, so what good is the Old Testament?Why would God want us to have faith in a specific number of Jewish exodus? Its not a part of Christian faith or of Christian creeds. Jesus can be the Son of God and resurrected without any exodus ever happening.
Therefore, I see no real reason for a Christian to fight for any specific view of that event, to die on that hill or to be anxious about it.
There are some prophecies about Christ. And some people find some places in it useful, theologically, poetically (like Psalms), even historically.You can say that about the flood, the creation, the kingdoms, so what good is the Old Testament?
Some people have been taught the Bible is the word of God and is to be taken literally. What you are saying challenges their faithThere are some prophecies about Christ. And some people find some places in it useful, theologically, poetically (like Psalms), even historically.
However, we do not need to be anxious about its literal historicity in everything, our faith is not based on that.
Yes, various people have been taught various things. And those things are challenged by education, public discussions and similar.Some people have been taught the Bible is the word of God and is to be taken literally. What you are saying challenges their faith
There are people who believe in that. Ask @The Barbarian . We disagree on most things but he is very knowledgeable about evolution and the BibleIs it fair to ask what is the Biblical evidence for evolution?
A gross reductio ad absurdum,The ToE is about survival of the fittest.
That's gonna be a difficult assertion to challenge, IMO.If animals can't find food, they simply die.
Generally true. I'd be very keen to hear of any notable exceptions to that. Where a species that was grossly unsuited to a particular environment thrived in that environment.The ones best adapted to their environment survive.
Uness they're in Chile or Argentina, because there aren't any there. Reckon why not? Does God refuse to take care of them there? Or is the difference simply (gasp!) environmental?Now Job 38:41 says:
Who provides for the raven its prey, when its young ones cry to God for help, and wander about for lack of food?
Does God hate corvids in Argentina?To my knowledge, the ToE does not leave any room for interventions like this. God helping animals wandering for lack of food out of love?
It's in the same part of the Bible as Ohm's Law and the Periodic Table.Is it fair to ask what is the Biblical evidence for evolution?
"Generally true. I'd be very keen to hear of any notable exceptions to that. Where a species that was grossly unsuited to a particular environment thrived in that environment."A gross reductio ad absurdum,
That's gonna be a difficult assertion to challenge, IMO.
Generally true. I'd be very keen to hear of any notable exceptions to that. Where a species that was grossly unsuited to a particular environment thrived in that environment.
Uness they're in Chile or Argentina, because there aren't any there. Reckon why not? Does God refuse to take care of them there? Or is the difference simply (gasp!) environmental?
Does God hate corvids in Argentina?
Yep. Not many groundhogs in Antarctica.In contrast, the Theory of Evolution proposes that if an animal survives, it means it was well adapted to their environment.
Yeah, the groundhogs should have learned to survive on snow cones and the occasional penguins.It gives the credit to the animals themselves.
So if I drop off a couple of dozen woodshucks of appropriate genders at the South Pole, they should live and thrive by Grace Alone. Si o no?I conclude, the proposition of a caring God is in direct contradiction to what the ToE teaches here.
You're fired.Larry Bird?
Becauss God wouldn't love you enough to send you food (and with any luck, tea...and a means of boiling water) at the South Pole?At the same time it is true you would certainly die in Antartica...
He lovingly provided the raven with means to survive. He made the universe to bring forth ravens with all His gifts to them. Did He not gift you with the means to succeed?To my knowledge, the ToE does not leave any room for interventions like this. God helping animals wandering for lack of food out of love?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?