-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
If evolution is true...
- Thread starter Praxiteles
- Start date
- Sep 3, 2002
- 10,643
- 293
- 57
- Faith
- Agnostic
Tsk. Quote mining. The favourite tactic of evilushoenists.Tomk80 said:
Get back to me when you see a shoe turning into a monkey. And furthermore, if there are shoes, why are there still monkeys? Huh?
Upvote
0
- Sep 3, 2002
- 10,643
- 293
- 57
- Faith
- Agnostic
But there *is* a conspiracy. The evocobblers are afraid they'll lose their funding and leather uppers if the truth (er... sorry, that should be "TRUTH") ever gets out.smog said:
Upvote
0
Praxiteles said:
Because the rate at which monkeys evolve into shoes is equal to the rate at which shoes evolve into monkeys, forming a shoe-monkey equilibrium.
Upvote
0
- Sep 3, 2002
- 10,643
- 293
- 57
- Faith
- Agnostic
But that's not evolution - that's DEvolution, which proves that it's a lie and a fraud and a conspiracy and evil and a lie. Plus, there are no transishoenals, excpet one with was a fraud and turned out to be a pig's shoe!smog said:
Upvote
0
Praxiteles said:
yeah but how do you explain all the new species of high heels that keep popping up every season?
Upvote
0
Herman Hedning
Hiking is fun
Simple, that's just micro-shoevolution. Macro-shoevolution has never been proven and is a lie anyways. Shoes can't shoevolve beyond size 9 and that is a proven fact. So there!Orihalcon said:
Upvote
0
i have proof of macro-evolution!
1. a basic pre-shoe, or pseudo-shoe.
2. here you see a few variations, or micro-evolution progressions of the above.
the one at the top seems to have branched off again into 2 variants, 3 and 4.
5. it is possible they have cross-bred to produce this taller variant.
6. this has turned into an extreme. clearly, 6 and 1 are no longer compatible with each other, and thus we have a new species.
1. a basic pre-shoe, or pseudo-shoe.
2. here you see a few variations, or micro-evolution progressions of the above.
the one at the top seems to have branched off again into 2 variants, 3 and 4.
5. it is possible they have cross-bred to produce this taller variant.
6. this has turned into an extreme. clearly, 6 and 1 are no longer compatible with each other, and thus we have a new species.
Upvote
0
Praxiteles said:
A monkey evolving into a shoe is evolution. The fact that some shoes are devolving into monkeys is irrelevant. Besides, there clearly are are transishoenals: brown furry shoes, for example.
Upvote
0
- Sep 3, 2002
- 10,643
- 293
- 57
- Faith
- Agnostic
What's this? Ring speshoes?Orihalcon said:
So are you claiming that each speshoe can interbreed with it's immediate neighbour, but not with the extremes?
Upvote
0
- Sep 3, 2002
- 10,643
- 293
- 57
- Faith
- Agnostic
But it's still a SHOE!smog said:
No-one has found a shoe with a cute furry face and a tail, have they? Shoes that swing from branch to branch?
Upvote
0
- Sep 3, 2002
- 10,643
- 293
- 57
- Faith
- Agnostic
Your pretty pictures don't impress me. Next thing you'll do, no doubt, is post a picture of a handbag and one of a shoulder bag and claim that that proves relatedness.WaZoO said:
Pshaw!
I repeat, pshaw!
Upvote
0
- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,070
- 16,820
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
But what about developments like gaitors, leggings, crampons (that might be the spikes, not the bladed attachments) and shoephones (hello Agent 99)? None of those things were part of the original sandal/fur foot wrap. Where did they comes from?
Upvote
0
Similar threads
