Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I might ask you the same. Should we go with only what twitter does not censor? Let's face it there are wildly different sources out there. CNN and the mainstream news have been shown to be pathetically bias and worthless as far as I am concerned.
Great. There are lots of sources. I also like to hear from people with boots on the ground, as well as various medical professionals. You can hear a lot of them on various news sites. I have also seen where stats are including people who died of covid, or possibly related to covid, or if they tested for the virus all included in stats. So wherever such stats are found they are bunk. Let's hope your sources are better than that. We also have no proper system in place to record deaths and serious side effects from the vaccine that I have heard of.I don't use them as sources, I use sources from the medical and scientific community. IE - New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association), National Library of Medican, etc. The list goes on.
I also like to hear from people with boots on the ground, as well as various medical professionals. You can hear a lot of them on various news sites.
What experts? What makes them an expert? What media do you trust?The first step is to reject mainstream media. The we can start getting objective and hearing from experts that warn about the situation.
150 studies show masks ineffective, harmfulCan you divulge one or two of the various professionals or various news sites you use? I'm looking for a couple of names of "professionals" you trust and a news source you trust.
Knowing that would help me understand where you are coming from and where you sre getting yout information.
Beware of random youtube videos and blogs.
WHere do you get your "information" from? Do you look for sources that agree with how you already feel or do you look for objective sources?
"
No country can boost its way out of the pandemic,” said the World Health Organization’s Secretary General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Wednesday.
“Blanket booster programs are likely to prolong the COVID-19 pandemic, rather than ending it, by diverting supply to countries that already have high levels of vaccination coverage, giving the virus more opportunity to spread and mutate.”
Nor should a third dose of vaccine be seen as carte blanche, he added. “Boosters cannot be seen as a ticket to go ahead with planned celebrations.”
WHO warns booster campaigns prolonging pandemic
So neither shots nor boosters are an 'excuse' to enjoy gatherings..or seemingly anything else at all!
They say tens of millions will die of starvation as a result of the lockdowns and etc. Should you have locked down and let them die? Many possibly millions have suffered death or severe problems as side effects of the vaccine.
Don't blame you at all.I've had my two but I won't be getting the booster.
Flattery will get you nowhereYou are living in another universe, my friend.
150 studies show masks ineffective, harmful
Nurses report 'overwhelming' number of heart attacks, clotting in vaccinated patients
This "alternative news source" seems to be posting "alternative reality."
Is this news source reliable because it says what you want it to say? If "mainstream media" is so corrupt, how honest do you think this source is?
Especially with articles titled:
The one and only thing that can stop the Marxist revolution currently engulfing America
Are you saying you are unable to see the bias this source is? You would trust this website over the world Health Organization.
Actually, I'm quite relieved. I thought people were finding credible studies that show how dangerous or ineffective the vaccines are. Turnes out its just low-budget right-wing propaganda in my view.
I can see a left-leaning bias in terms of highlighting issues and stories that left-wing people care about. The thing that is important relating to my comment is that even though the viewpoint is left-leaning, the information is factual.According to this Left biased watchdog...:
LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See more Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate the Times of Israel Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/times-of-israel/
...this is a highly factual Left leaning source.
I'm skeptical of Left leaning watchdogs and sources. I'm also skeptical of this vaccine. I'm also skeptical of gathering at Christmas superspreader events.
I've taken this Shabbat for studying scripture, prayer, time with my CF family, Yahshua, and our heavenly father.
Whether liars get bigger budgets should not be the issue. I might add that most of the major voices (Biden etc) that I have heard pulpit pounding the vaccine agenda also represent deep and outright evils such as abortion......
I don't know how somebody represents abortion but I' surely not telling you where to get your news.Whether liars get bigger budgets should not be the issue. I might add that most of the major voices (Biden etc) that I have heard pulpit pounding the vaccine agenda also represent deep and outright evils such as abortion.
When they push the killing of babies they represent a bad position.I don't know how somebody represents abortion but I' surely not telling you where to get your news.
So have you any research that shows how various jurisdictions come up with death stats? Here is one jurisdiction where that seems to be clear.Getting news is one thing. Doing research is another. Research isn't just wading through news channels and websites. Peer-reviewed studies have all of the information about how they tested the theory, what measurements they used, the results of everything, and who performed the testing.
False. Because some experts have quit and started revealing what went on. Why would we choose your preferred experts? You do realize experts can withhold certain info?All of that must be analyzed and approved by experts in the same field. That is when something is considered scientifically proven.
Often one can simply look at them talking themselves and listen. Usually studies and other sources are cited also. What, did you think we would believe a facebook factcheck or something?When you get information from any news source mainstream or alternative, you still have to check the sources they cite.
No such thing. There has not been a clear process to report all deaths and effects of the vaccines for example. What are we supposed to 'check'? The stats that are avail are a joke regarding covid deaths, so we can't check them. It has morphed more into who we believe.See what the source has to say and where they got their information. You want verifiable data.
Those are the ones who hated their job or got fired likely. I'll go with the consensus rather than the disgruntled employee.False. Because some experts have quit and started revealing what went on. Why would we choose your preferred experts? You do realize experts can withhold certain info?
You could look at me talking all day. It doesn't mean what I say is true.Often one can simply look at them talking themselves and listen. Usually studies and other sources are cited also. What, did you think we would believe a facebook factcheck or something?
It's better to go with the most amount of experts. Not the one expert that goes the other way. Verifiable data.No such thing. There has not been a clear process to report all deaths and effects of the vaccines for example. What are we supposed to 'check'? The stats that are avail are a joke regarding covid deaths, so we can't check them. It has morphed more into who we believe.
Or that had a conscience and some guts!Those are the ones who hated their job or got fired likely. I'll go with the consensus rather than the disgruntled employee.
If you were a top doctor with scores of published papers, or an executive of a vaccine drug company and seemed sincere, you might have some credibility.You could look at me talking all day. It doesn't mean what I say is true.
How about the Nazis? They went along. Does that make them right? Maybe some of them should have grown a pair also?It's better to go with the most amount of experts. Not the one expert that goes the other way. Verifiable data.
Do you look for sources that agree with how you already feel or do you look for objective sources?
I can see a left-leaning bias in terms of highlighting issues and stories that left-wing people care about. The thing that is important relating to my comment is that even though the viewpoint is left-leaning, the information is factual.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?