Praxiteles
PraxAce
- Sep 3, 2002
- 10,643
- 293
- 56
- Faith
- Agnostic
I don't think it's fair (or accurate) to call A4C a troll.
He thinks he's doing his duty, I think.
He thinks he's doing his duty, I think.
Upvote
0
On the contrary perhaps you are the one not listening. What I have stated is that in many respects the earth was significantly different pre flood compared to now There were much more tropical growth perhaps covering all of the earths surface (which was a necessity to support a large dinosaur population). There would be much more of that growth and it would be at higher altitude because it would be growing in good soils that once covered higher ground. That soil would now be the basis of the sediment layers now at significantly lower altitudes.Praxiteles said:You... just... do... not... listen. Do you?
Even if the earth were exactly the same as it was today, with ice caps, and deep oceans, it could still not absorb enough of the energy released to prevent it all from boiling. And you postulate a world that is already warmer, with less deep oceans and no ice caps!
A4C said:On the contrary perhaps you are the one not listening. What I have stated is that in many respects the earth was significantly different pre flood compared to now There were much more tropical growth perhaps covering all of the earths surface (which was a necessity to support a large dinosaur population). There would be much more of that growth and it would be at higher altitude because it would be growing in good soils that once covered higher ground. That soil would now be the basis of the sediment layers now at significantly lower altitudes.
Now without that difference I might aknowledge that you have a point but your continual PRATT ing ignoring these changes is wearing just a little thin
Rubbishalerj123 said:This would be enough to fry the earth.
A4C said:Rubbish
There is only one source of energy available to "fry" this earth -the sun
Now could you explain in terms that make sense how that energy source suddenly increases in strength if there is a water canopy
A4C said:Rubbish
There is only one source of energy available to "fry" this earth -the sun
Now could you explain in terms that make sense how that energy source suddenly increases in strength if there is a water canopy
The thing you're missing is that the pre-flood environment was different than what you've stated. The lush forests existed primarily on land masses near the Indian Ocean. The dinosaurs survived mostly on grass, and they shared the land with the buffalo and zebra. There was an infestation of microscopic pladulae about 300 years before Noah's birth. Therefore all rain that would have fallen in a global flood had remnants of this infestation. Now, the dinosaurs eventually built up an immunity, which is in the fossil record, but that didn't bode well for the zebra. We're not sure whether it affected the buffalo. (There are hints in ancient Sioux lore, but nothing definitive.) Anyway, if this global flood did happen like you say, there would be traces of pladulae in buffalo fossils, yet none have been found. Therefore, the flood probally didn't happen.A4C said:On the contrary perhaps you are the one not listening. What I have stated is that in many respects the earth was significantly different pre flood compared to now There were much more tropical growth perhaps covering all of the earths surface (which was a necessity to support a large dinosaur population). There would be much more of that growth and it would be at higher altitude because it would be growing in good soils that once covered higher ground. That soil would now be the basis of the sediment layers now at significantly lower altitudes.
Now without that difference I might aknowledge that you have a point but your continual PRATT ing ignoring these changes is wearing just a little thin
It certainly helped me.Hungry Hungry Hippo said:Seriously, dude, pressure cooker.
Maybe this will help you understand.
OK so taking into consideration the changs I have alluded to explain how the same sun pre flood would have taken on a reverse role to what it has now ie less rain forest conditions more global warmingPraxiteles said:Yes, I know you keep stating that the earth was significantly different.
So what?
No matter what state it was in, it would soon have reached a temperature beyond that at which life could survive.
You can keep stating the the earth was different then all day if you like. It wouldn't alter the fact the it would all have been turned into superheated soup.
So I checked out AiG's flood model, per your suggestion (see? somebody took your suggestion )A4C said:The vapour canopy covering the earth was not miles thick as you suppose because at least stars could be seen through it.
I think you better do your calculations again this time taking into consideration the distribution of global surface water, soil coverage and vegetation and the amout of energy available and its absorption.
Lucretius said:For the flood to be true, it would have to rain 15 feet per hour, for 40 days.
On what land mass distribution have you calculated that on?Lucretius said:For the flood to be true, it would have to rain 15 feet per hour, for 40 days.