ID for you and me?

I followed the links and I really liked this little gem.

"Darwinian evolution is an interesting theory about the remote history of life. Nonetheless, it has little practical impact on those branches of science that do not address questions of biological history (largely based on stones, the fossil evidence). Modern biology is engaged in the examination of tissues from living organisms with new methods and instruments. None of the great discoveries in biology and medicine over the past century depended on guidance from Darwinian evolution---it provided no support. "

An open letter to the Kansas State Board of Education from Professor Philip S. Skell, Member, National Academy of Sciences

It's a refreshingly balanced treatment of the subject. On the one hand he says that religious zealots seek to abandon evolutionary theory entirely and at the other extreme there are neodarwinians who refuse to accept valid criticisms. I expect this will lead to a more balanced approach to teaching science to students, which is something the public schools need.

Personally, I never advocated the teaching of creationist in the public schools even though I am a creationism. At the same time I have had serious problems with neodarwinism and it's nice to know I'm not the only one.

Thanks for the links Matisyahu, it was interesting.

surprise noones linked this one: these guys are the biggest proponents of ID around

http://www.discovery.org/csc/scientificResearch/