armed2010 said:
your not proving anything here? a true evolutionist
I said Jesus said we would be persecuted but where is the post of me saying one of you guys are persecuting me?
you made that up
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
armed2010 said:Jaci Fan- Jesus said we would be persecuted for the truth and taking His word as truth
Ya, i assumed as much
Genetics has done little in terms of proving evolutionary theory, and the fossil record is a bigger problem than it is a help for you. Over millions of years, you guys claim that massive changes took place. But many examples in the fossil record don't help your claims. One such example can be found at:Pete Harcoff said:Evolution is also testable. One of the big tests the discovery of genetics and the confirmation of the fossil evidence relative to the genetic evidence.
armed2010 said:real science does not say that, try again.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.htmldctalkexp said:Genetics has done little in terms of proving evolutionary theory,
Oh boy
and the fossil record is a bigger problem than it is a help for you. Over millions of years, you guys claim that massive changes took place. But many examples in the fossil record don't help your claims. One such example can be found at:
Spot the difference
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i3/difference.asp
God bless.
No. Real science says that life originally came from non-life. In fact, they can produce life from non-life in the lab nowadays.Jaci Fan said:Real science says Life comes from Life
absord that in
then absorb it in some more
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.htmlJaci Fan said:Real Science does not say that?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!
Tell me the names of these modern biologists who say that life did not originally come from non-life.Jaci Fan said:Real Science does not say that?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!
David Gould said:No. Real science says that life originally came from non-life. In fact, they can produce life from non-life in the lab nowadays.
And real science says that that original life form evolved into the diversity of species that we see around us.
Name 20 modern biologists who do not accept evolution - in fact, name 5.
dctalkexp said:Genetics has done little in terms of proving evolutionary theory, and the fossil record is a bigger problem than it is a help for you. Over millions of years, you guys claim that massive changes took place. But many examples in the fossil record don't help your claims. One such example can be found at:
Spot the difference
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i3/difference.asp
God bless.
This post makes me suspect that Jaci Fan is a troll. Maybe I'm just being paranoid but the sensors tingled a little ...Jaci Fan said:your not proving anything here? a true evolutionist
I said Jesus said we would be persecuted but where is the post of me saying one of you guys are persecuting me?
you made that up
Caps lock stuck?Jaci Fan said:NAME SOMEONE OTHER THAN GOD INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO CREATE A PERFECTLY DESIGNED BEAUTIFUL CREATION WORLD WITH EVERYTHING IN IT?
False. Why do you evolutionists often lie to try to prove something. It's better to work with the truth. Give me any documented example where life has come fom non-life. Let's see a cell assemble itself from non-living matter.David Gould said:No. Real science says that life originally came from non-life. In fact, they can produce life from non-life in the lab nowadays.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.htmldctalkexp said:False. Why do you evolutionists often lie to try to prove something. It's better to work with the truth. Give me any documented example where life has come fom non-life. Let's see a cell assemble itself from non-living matter.
David Gould said:This post makes me suspect that Jaci Fan is a troll. Maybe I'm just being paranoid but the sensors tingled a little ...
What has that got to do with it? You are arguing that "real science" says that life only comes from life. Give me the names of some real live scientists who say this.Jaci Fan said:NAME SOMEONE OTHER THAN GOD INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO CREATE A PERFECTLY DESIGNED BEAUTIFUL CREATION WORLD WITH EVERYTHING IN IT?
dctalkexp said:Thank you for your visual aid, but it does little to help your case. You calim that the changes are so minute, that it is impossible to see evolution on a big-scale in our life time. Well, in order to suppoert this theory, you have to show at least some examples of how anamolies in the DNA can produce at least a slightly new and improved anatomical structure. Can you?
Almost all of the minute changes we see in organisms are detrimental to it. They are a far cry from evolution of the microbes to man sort. Change = evolution, but change does not = the theory of evolution proven by any means.
Observation shows that things devolve, more or less.
Are you going to answer any questions?Jaci Fan said:MORE NAME CALLING
TYPICAL EVOLUTIONIST BEHAVIOR
dctalkexp said:False. Why do you evolutionists often lie to try to prove something. It's better to work with the truth. Give me any documented example where life has come fom non-life. Let's see a cell assemble itself from non-living matter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?