David Brider
Well-Known Member
- Aug 18, 2004
- 6,513
- 700
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Methodist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- UK-Greens
Which means you're against sexual equipment such as a vibrator which can't consent.
I've no opinion one way or another on sexual equipment.
The reason I seem to be 'harping' because it's such a glaring hole in your reasoning.
Mutual consent means both parties agree to a romantic/sexual relationship. The only hole in that is one that you've created because you believe this bizarre fallacy that because an animal is incapable of offering consent, therefore consent is not relevant to any discussion of inappropriate behavior with animals. The reality is that it's precisely the animal's inability to offer consent that renders inappropriate behavior with animals wrong.
Are you against eating animals because they can't consent? No (I presume) because you're not because why?
Mutual consent isn't an issue in meat eating. Mutual consent is an issue in romantic and sexual relationships. Do you understand that they're not the same thing?
David.
Upvote
0