Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
there are many who can't take social security
get a gov't job or:
8 Types of Americans Who Won't Get Social Security
And there are millions that see NHS's shortcomings, failures, and overreach into individual rights of UK citizens. All opinions are noted.
"universal healthcare coverage" = forcing your neighbor to pay for your healthcare and you being forced to pay for your neighbors'. Does that sound right?
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but some ways of paying for a social good can definitely be better for individuals and for society than others.
If that is allowed as a definition of "socialism" then obviously it isn't "failed".
Would completely agree that state communism failed.
So I only agree 100%. And disagree 10%.
Ok. Then by one of those definitions socialism is doing fine.it is one of THREE definitions I posted. Sorry you missed that
Maybe now we'll have the end of all the people claiming that Biden is a radical leftist who is trying to usher in socialism."Communism is a failed system, universally failed system," Biden admitted. "I don't see socialism as a very useful substitute, but that's another story," he continued without elaborating.
100% in agreement on both items.
Communism is a failed system and Socialism is not a very useful substitute.
And there are millions that see NHS's shortcomings, failures, and overreach into individual rights of UK citizens. All opinions are noted.
"universal healthcare coverage" = forcing your neighbor to pay for your healthcare and you being forced to pay for your neighbors'. Does that sound right?
Currently you can pay off your student debt in 10-15 years at the high end
The NHS is well-known to be one of the worst examples of universal health care--and there are many better examples--yet not many Brits are anxious to get rid of it to go on the "American plan."
If they voted for it, it's not "force" any more than any other democratically voted tax. Many people don't like being "forced" to pay for such an outsized military force or corn subsidies or space exploration. At this point, we're just haggling over details.
And as far as total outlay, Americans are paying more money for poorer healthcare than Europeans.
But how healthcare is managed and paid for and how higher education would be managed and paid for are two separate issues. In both cases, though, Americans are paying far more than necessary...mostly because of the middle-men.
I can understand why too. The "American plan" is the worst of both worlds. Medicare/aid drives costs through the roof, private insurance makes up for it through high premiums for both employer and their employees, then you slap the "certificate of need" icing on top to lock down the market and stifle market competition. It's horrible.
Trading the current 'middle men' for the the Federal Government that has never run a business without massive cost over runs and incredible amounts of red tape and regulations. Is not a viable option IMHO
Someone need to explain to me how Medicare drives costs through the roof.
Just a couple of weeks ago, I had an outpatient prostate procedure done. The doctor and hospital charged $19,000. Medicare paid one tenth of that, $1,900, and since they allowed only that much, my secondary insurance, Tricare (military) didn't pay any more.
The doctor specializes in that procedure...he does four or five a day. This was an "old man's procedure" that practically no man younger than 65 would ever have. I expect Medicare doesn't pay any more for any of them than they paid for mine, so $1,900 is pretty much all he ever gets.
And for that matter, my previous employee insurance never paid the full amount charged, either. And neither of them will pay for a whole lot of tests, examinations, and procedures doctors say are advisable.
So how are they driving up costs? The price we pay for insurance is more than the costs they pay for medical services--which is how health insurance companies and the medical billing industry make their money. It's not the doctors, it's the middlemen.
The costs to the consumer would be higher without Medicare or Blue Cross negotiating a set of charges for thousands of customers at once.
The examples of other countries says otherwise.
Of course we can compare to other countries. We're talking about providing health care to human beings, not some alien life forms. Whats so off the charts special about the USA needs?This isn’t other countries.
I can’t judge how well the Cleveland Browns will perform based on how well the Yankees played last year.
That sounds like they're keeping down the cost, not the other way around. I don't think it's the cost of what is actually being paid to healthcare givers that's the problem (just as the wages paid to college instructors is not really the problem). It's the insurance companies, the billing industry, bankers, and all other profit-takers in between.
This isn’t other countries.
I can’t judge how well the Cleveland Browns will perform based on how well the Yankees played last year.
The open question is who should set the prices of doctors, other health professionals, and hospitals (for the use of their equipment and facilities.
One option is for the state to take over the means of production, set the prices and own the facilities and set the wage rates. Here competition for services is gone. Monetary incentives for medical professionals is no longer relevant. Do we dream that the administrative cost has gone away, or is lessened, because the government is in charge.
Another option is for doctors and others to organize in groups and buy the hospitals (the HMO model). Here individuals would be free to chose their HMO. Each HMO might have different plans.
We could have insurance companies gather tens of thousands of members, and then set rates for any set of doctors who will accept those rates. Is it worth nothing for one entity to negotiate rates. Do we believe that individuals would do better negotiating on their own.
The government could become the insurance company (Medicare instead of the HMO, or the BCBS).
============
SOME OPEN QUESTIONS
1) How do we best minimize administrative costs?
2) How do we reduce the overall cost of highest quality service?
3) How do we incentivize doctors and hospitals for developing improved methods, and processes?
It is NOT at all clear to me that taking the PROFIT OUT is the answer. Is the administrative costs of an HMO really lower than that of a government owned and operated system? Give me Kaiser thank you.
Personally, I think that a single-payer system like Medicare works fine. Do we think that Medicare is a failed system merely because it could be a better administrator, or because there are many improvements that could be made?
I believe that supplementary insurance plans are a good idea. At very least, there should many choices of plan. Again, is it really wrong to pay insurance companies to the administration? Are they really so much worse at than the government? Standardization of forms is a great need.
BOTTOM LINE FOR ME
It is not all clear which system provides the best care for the lowest long-term cost. And it is certainly not clear that a government owned system for doctors and hospitals is a very good idea at all. It may be better than the US, but that is a very low bar indeed.
And just BTW, how would eliminating supplemental insurance work? The government wouldn't cover everything in the way that everyone once. Some would be willing to pay for more service. Are we to disallow this, or forbid people to form groups to negotiate?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?