• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Hypothetical: Creationism becomes standard in science classes

Status
Not open for further replies.

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Tell us in your own words what you think a scientific theory is. (And no, copy and pasting a dictionary definition is not your own words.)

Evolution is a theory :oldthumbsup:

Ah, you can't tell us in your own words what a scientific theory is. It would appear that you have no purpose here other than to disrupt.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Larniavc
Upvote 0

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,772
✟138,525.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Wow, you are really bad at this. It's almost as if you didn't watch your own video. The cited WingNut Daily story had nothing do with the evolution. I know the actual story and what it was actually about. Do you?

I know that truth is truth whether or not it is believed
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,609
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,216.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But the "maturity" would imply a history, and the implied history could be studied.
Adam came on the scene fully mature.

I say he came on the scene mature without history.

What history do you say he experienced?
 
Upvote 0

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,772
✟138,525.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
But the "maturity" would imply a history, and the implied history could be studied. And how would one determine that the implied history was not an actual history . . . scientifically?

And I'll ask you again . Jesus genealogy is traced and recorded back to Adam and Eve, who was Adams father and who was Eves mother and father fellow Baptist ?
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,858
✟278,532.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
And I'll ask you again . Jesus genealogy is traced and recorded back to Adam and Eve, who was Adams father and who was Eves mother and father fellow Baptist ?

That information is lost to history in the form you have asked for.
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,858
✟278,532.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Adam came on the scene fully mature.

I say he came on the scene mature without history.

What history do you say he experienced?

First tell me the exact nature of his mature creation. What was his apparent age, did he or did he not have a navel, what was the nature of his DNA, what was the color of his skin, and what callouses was he created with? How long were his fingernails, and if they were short, what marks were there reflecting how they were shortened? Did the fingernails have ridges? How long was his hair? Was his beard long or shaved? His hair . . was it indefinately long, or reasonable short, and if reasonably short, what were the ends like as to how they were shortened?

Let me know all these thing so I can begin a reasonable reconstruction of the implied past history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,858
✟278,532.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Could I consider your explanation your theory ?

My theory is that God took aside a member of the species Homo Sapiens and ensouled him, making Adam thereby. Perhaps in conjunction with thoughts forming in Adam about eternity and spiritual things.
 
Upvote 0

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,772
✟138,525.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
First tell me the exact nature of his mature creation. What was his apparent age, did he or did he not have a navel, what was the nature of his DNA, what was the color of his skin, and what callouses was he created with? How long were his fingernails, and if they were short, what marks were there reflecting how they were shortened? Did the fingernails have ridges? How long was his hair? Was his beard long or shaved? His hair . . was it indefinately long, or reasonable short, and if reasonably short, what were the ends like as to how they were shortened?

Let me know all these thing so I can begin a reasonable reconstruction of the implied past history.

^_^
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,772
✟138,525.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
My theory is that God took aside a member of the species Homo Sapiens and ensouled him, making Adam thereby. Perhaps in conjunction with thoughts forming in Adam about eternity and spiritual things.

And I have a brand new 1983 Ford pick'm up truck for sale only driven once a week to church by an old lady . You can buy that too, bring a tow truck and I'll even throw in some jumper cables . ^_^
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
But the "maturity" would imply a history, and the implied history could be studied. And how would one determine that the implied history was not an actual history . . . scientifically?
It's called "Last Thursdayism." The entire universe and its contents including fake evidence of age, fake history and our own fake memories complete was created last Thursday (or whatever date you like, even 4004 BC). And you can never prove otherwise because it's unfalsifiable.

As all properly composed theological propositions ought to be.
 
Upvote 0

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,772
✟138,525.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It's called "Last Thursdayism." The entire universe and its contents including fake evidence of age, fake history and our own fake memories complete was created last Thursday (or whatever date you like, even 4004 BC). And you can never prove otherwise because it's unfalsifiable.

As all properly composed theological propositions ought to be.

If only you could show your same desperation in prayer to our Creator ..
 
  • Like
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

Queller

I'm where?
May 25, 2012
6,446
681
✟52,592.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Others
That just sounds like young earth creationism which I have read a lot about e.g. they say God created starlight in flight so we can see distant stars etc.
Yep. That's pretty much what it is.

AV1611VET said embedded age means the world is millions of years "old" but God created it 6000 years "ago".
That's what I'm getting at with the tractor analogy. It looks old but God created it yesterday.

In fact, now that I think about, I think the first time I ever heard the tractor analogy was from AV1611VET years ago on either CARM or beliefnet.com.

I asked whats the difference between how old something is, and how long ago it came into existence (same thing to me) --- he said "have a good day" :scratch:
Well, that's kind of to be expected when you try to have a conversation with AV1611VET. That's why I have him on ignore.

If you really want to see some tap dancing away from giving you an answer, ask him to explain why an object such as the earth not only has an appearance of age (looks millions of years old but was created 6,000 years ago) also has an appearance of history (craters created by the impacts of asteroids that would have left the earth a molten pit if they had occurred less than 6,000 years ago).

Another way to look at appearance of age versus appearance of history is to imagine God creating Adam fully grown as described in Genesis but also giving Adam a scar on his knee from a childhood fall.

Well that kind of makes logical sense, but its very hard to think of ways that laws/forces might change to give us the world we see today. Thats very much like YEC with speed of light etc.
Yes, it is just like that. Unfortunately for that argument, the changed forces would have left detectable evidence.

No problem.
 
Upvote 0

Queller

I'm where?
May 25, 2012
6,446
681
✟52,592.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Others
I just did tell you what a scientific theory is , maybe you can do better ?
No, you didn't. You gave an example of a scientific theory. Can you define "scientific theory"?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.