How to kill Palestinians

thereselittleflower said:

Prove it!

Prove that you Jews can trace your lineage back to the original tribes!

NO Jew can do so today!


I await your proof!


EVERYTHING you have claimed hinges first of all on this proof!

Again, I await your proof!

.

Click to expand...

Why do you need proof? Are you trying to prove that the Jews of today are not real Jews?

Tanakh said:

Why do you need prood? Are you trying to prove that the Jews of today are not real Jews?

Click to expand...

Ok, I have Jewish blood what does this entitle me to?

Micah68 said:

Yes terrorism of any kind by anyone goes against God's teaching. Below is what a quick seach of Israeli terroism turns up.

Click to expand...

Eden Natan Zada was justified and by the way several arab MK's were their cheering the crowd on as Zada was beaten to death.

thereselittleflower said:

What bloodline? The Ashkenazi Jews are descended from european converts. . . . .

.

Click to expand...

Actually they are not descendants of European converts as very few converted to Judaism in Europe or anywhere for that matter.

thereselittleflower said:

Then why are you supporting the state of Israel which is guilty of many terror crimes and human rights violations?

Where do you get your marching orders to support such a regime?



Then why do we not see you confronting the evil deeds and actions and policies of the State of Israel and Zionist terrorism perpetrated by it?

.

Click to expand...

Well you clearly get your marching orders from the pope and the church who has killed millions over the past 1900 years so don't talk to me about "human rights violations"! And sense you are so concerned about the "rights" of others then why don't you discuss Saudi Arabia or Pakistan instead of Israel when other country's have done worse to their own people and others?

Micah68 said:

NOT! Even close, the fact the Arafat did win a Nobel Peace Prize should give you reason to dig a little deeper.
Always verifing your sources.

Barak's "generous" offer

What Barak offered at Camp David was a formula for continued Israeli military occupation under the name of a "state."

The proposal would have meant:

• no territorial contiguity for the Palestinian state,
• no control of its external borders,
• limited control of its own water resources, and
• no full Israeli withdrawal from occupied territory as required by international law.

See maps showing what the Israeli proposals would have looked like in reality on this site.

Click to expand...

The fact that Arafat won a "peace prize" speaks laud and clear about those that submitted him and elected him to get that "prize" and to those that thinks he is a great person. He was a pedophile and died of AIDS so put 2 and 2 together and figure out the kind of person he really was. And by the way Barak was willing to give up all of Jerusalem so his offer was "generous" indeed but the fact that the "Palestinians" did not take it made clear what they are really after; all of Israel.

Micah68 said:

Ok, I have Jewish blood what does this entitle me to?

Click to expand...

It entitles you to nothing sense you married a "Palestinian Christian" and accepted Jesus thus if you do have Jewish "blood" you have thus forfeited your right among us Jews.

Tanakh said:

It entitles you to nothing sense you married a "Palestinian Christian" and accepted Jesus thus if you do have Jewish "blood" you have thus forfeited your right among us Jews.

Click to expand...

Tanakh, you're really funny.

Micah68 said:

Tanakh, you're really funny.

Click to expand...

LOL

Tanakh said:

Eden Natan Zada was justified and by the way several arab MK's were their cheering the crowd on as Zada was beaten to death.

Click to expand...

What???? Eden Zada's actions were justified??? You have got to be joking- even the Israeli government condemned his actions!!

How were his actions any more justified than those of the Palestinian suicide bombers?

Servant222 said:

What???? Eden Zada's actions were justified??? You have got to be joking- even the Israeli government condemned his actions!!

How were his actions any more justified than those of the Palestinian suicide bombers?

Click to expand...

Because he was provoked on the bus not before going on the bus. The Israeli government condemns everything that its soldiers do so that it does not "offend" the arabs.

Provocation does not justify murder.

Tanakh said:

Because he was provoked on the bus not before going on the bus. The Israeli government condemns everything that its soldiers do so that it does not "offend" the arabs.

Click to expand...

Funnel's Law: Wide for me, Narrow for you.

thereselittleflower said:

Obviously, you haven't been paying too much attention to my posts about the IRON WALL. May I suggest you do some research on it.

.

Click to expand...

I also suggest you do a little research.


I stopped listening to Steve Berry's The Alexandria Link is that this book is evil

I mean that this book, to the degree that it is read by people ignorant of history (i.e., practically everybody), will move us closer to a future in which our society permits or even approves of the murder of Jews and the destruction of the state of Israel.


Wait! This book is fiction! How could it have such an effect?
Well, it can't -- not all by itself. Its effect is incremental. But it's real.
Here's how it works.
At the beginning of the book, we are shown a Palestinian during the 1948 war over the creation of the state of Israel. The scene is about how this Palestinian has been torturing a man he captured in order to find out what he is doing; then he kills him. But the torture is not treated in the fiction as anything other than a regrettable necessity; later, the character does in fact regret his actions that day.
That's not what makes this book evil. No, it's the fact that Berry sets this scene against a background in which Israelis are systematically driving all the Palestinians out of Israel; the Israelis are heavily armed by the British while the Palestinians have no weapons to counter them; and the Israelis have rounded up whole villages of Palestinians and slaughtered them, men and women alike.
These things are not what the scene is about. They are slipped in as background; they are treated as if they were the sort of thing that was really going on in Palestine in 1948.
This is the kind of thing that readers -- especially ones who don't know anything about history -- are likely to assume the writer has researched, so that it can be trusted. The book is fiction, so we know this particular character did not torture and kill the other guy -- that part is obviously made up. But the background is assumed to be real. And readers often come out of books like this thinking they now know something about the real world.
In fact, what Berry is providing is pure propaganda -- the propaganda created by terrorists and murderers to "prove" that Jews "deserve" to be blown up by suicide bombers. It is exactly as reliable as the widely-believed propaganda lie that either President Bush or the state of Israel -- or both -- actually carried out the 9/11 attacks in order to provide a pretext for invading innocent Muslim countries.
(Oddly, the same liars who make this claim often turn around and talk about how proud they are that Islam stood up against the West on 9/11. Which is it? Why would you be proud of it if you didn't do it? They know they're lying; the incredible thing is that so many supposed intellectuals in the West believe it, or pretend to.)
The truth -- the well-documented historical truth -- is that the British did not arm the Israelis. They blocked all attempts by the Israelis to arm themselves. Every weapon that the Israeli army had in 1948 was smuggled in. While the "poor, unarmed Palestinians" were supported by the fully-armed military forces of Jordan, Syria, and Egypt. The Arabs had the military advantage, in numbers and in weaponry.
Furthermore, while there were places where Israelis encouraged Muslims to flee, it was not a systematic effort, and many of those who fled did so at the well-documented insistence of Muslim leaders, who wanted Muslims out of the way so they could set about the business of slaughtering Jews. Only Israeli courage and audacity in combat prevented the genocidal outcome intended by the Arabs who defied the United Nations by trying to destroy Israel at the moment of its creation.
At the end of the war, the reason there was no Palestinian state is not because the Israelis prevented it. It was because the Arab nations prevented it -- Egypt took over the rule of the Gaza Strip and Jordan ruled the West Bank, declaring it to be part of their national territory and suppressing any attempt to create a Palestinian state there. As for wholesale slaughter of Palestinian civilians by Israelis, it didn't happen. Nowhere, not in 1948, and not since then. A lot of people think it has happened because of propaganda. Like when the media was full of reports, during the intifadeh, that Israelis had massacred hundreds or thousands of Palestinians in Jenin. Later, sober investigation showed that no such thing had happened -- that, on the contrary, Israelis had suffered needless casualties on their own side because of the extraordinary lengths they went to to prevent civilian casualties on the other side.

http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2007-02-18-1.html

thereselittleflower said:

With a plan that the whole world will have to "share the pain" of a nuclear holocaust, nuclear winter, etc?

No . . such a plan is straight from the pits of hell!

.

Click to expand...

If the world supports our enemies then they will suffer for it. As a nuclear strike would only be used if Israel was attacked by many nations at once where by the end was inevitable and thus the end of the world would soon come so if that happens the goy would have no one to blame but themselves.

Servant222 said:

Provocation does not justify murder.

Click to expand...

Self defense is not murder as you are protecting yourself against the murderer(s).