Catherineanne
Well-Known Member
- Sep 1, 2004
- 22,924
- 4,646
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Widowed
I sometimes still have trouble believing that while a religion's dogma puts lying up there as one of the worst possible things you could do, it's followers still insist that they've talked personally with God in a manner that they claim couldn't be attributed to desperate imagination or mental illness. You know you've never talked to God directly, so why keep lying about it? You know every single one of you who might speak in tongues at church is faking it, but you do it anyway because you fear that all the other fakers aren't faking it.
Quit being dishonest with yourselves and open your eyes and your minds to reality. It's actually a much much larger and wondrous universe than the one described as being created by God in your holy book.
So many of you have already doubted, you just repress it. "What would my parents do? What would my friends do?"
The reason it's so difficult to take those Christians that are so afraid that they claim to believe in the literal account of Genesis seriously is because I know that you're either mad or lying.
I know you think the creation story and the flood story are ridiculously impossible, and that you've never see one proof of God. I know that you see the beauty in the universe and know that you know it's all really there. Why waste your life lying to yourself and others?
Sorry, everyone.. feeling a little "soapbox-y".
I think you have your definition of 'Christian' a little wonky.
A Christian must believe in Jesus Christ as his or her Lord and Saviour, and hopefully also ascribe to Nicene.
http://www.creeds.net/ancient/nicene.htm
After that a belief in a literal Noah's Ark, Garden of Eden, infallible Bible and modern manifestation of the charismatic gifts is purely optional.
Clearly, those who hold such beliefs will tend to regard them as mandatory, but in fact the Bible says no such thing, and most Christians on earth are not at all bothered about them.
However, you also have your definition of mental illness a little wonky as well. In a culture which accepts the possible existence of God, as ours still does on the whole, anyone customarily addressing God cannot be regarded as mentally ill on that count alone. Our culture accepts talking to God as part of the very broad range that comprises normal, in other words.
It is only if they address a being who cannot be shown to be culturally validated that their mental health may be called into question.
I do hope that helps, on both counts.
Upvote
0