How old is the world?

[Self Improvement]

Exactly That is why evolution is impossible

Oh please, go into detail here.

 

[In A Perfect World]

Exactly That is why evolution is impossible

Reproduction is what brings about gene mutation, or did you just dismiss evolution while you were in middle school biology too?

You appear to have no idea how the ToE works.

 

[AnEmpiricalAgnostic]

Getting back to the OP for a second before the resident YECers completely derail this person’s thread…



http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html

 

[nvxplorer]

Exactly That is why evolution is impossible

Leave it to yourself to forestall the binding future. It seems redundant to mention the microscopic pladula one more time.

 

[Praxiteles]

Exactly That is why evolution is impossible

Urg.

I'd love to see your reasoning for this.

 

[A4C]

Reproduction is what brings about gene mutation, or did you just dismiss evolution while you were in middle school biology too?

You appear to have no idea how the ToE works.

There is no way that mutations could ever produce another species
Depite theorizing about its possibilities it is scientifically imposible and certainly cannot be considered the basis of every life form we know on earth
As I have said before there is good science and there is bad science
Good science tells us how God designed things
Bad science tells us how things designed themselves

 

[AnEmpiricalAgnostic]

There is no way that mutations could ever produce another species

It’s about as crazy as those mathists huh? I mean sure 1+1=2 and I can see how 1+1+1+1=4, but adding ones getting you to 14billion?!? That’s just crazy mathist rhetoric huh?

 

[Praxiteles]

Evolution is differential reproductive success coupled with mutation.

How you could claim that reproduction is a count against evolution is akin to arguing that rain is impossible because clouds are made of water vapour.

In addition, science is the study of the physical. Whether good or bad, it can make no comment about God at all. This is akin to trying to measure the distance between Sydney and Melbourne using the first six bars of Beethoven's 5th.

 

[In A Perfect World]

There is no way that mutations could ever produce another species
Depite theorizing about its possibilities it is scientifically imposible and certainly cannot be considered the basis of every life form we know on earth
As I have said before there is good science and there is bad science
Good science tells us how God designed things
Bad science tells us how things designed themselves

Really? Even if the mutations eventually added up to a new species themselves? So microevolution so to say has its limits? Why do THEY bother evolving then? Why do species need to change just a little, but never need to change a lot? You can't just throw a million dice down and say "the sum of all die has to be less than 2 million".

Evolution is the slow and gradual process by which individuals and/or species evolve. Unless you think that the world is 6000 years old in which case ToE would be impossible anyway and would be begging the question.

 

[Praxiteles]

Full marks to you, A4C. You truly are great fun to spar with.

 

[nvxplorer]

There is no way that mutations could ever produce another species
Depite theorizing about its possibilities it is scientifically imposible and certainly cannot be considered the basis of every life form we know on earth
As I have said before there is good science and there is bad science
Good science tells us how God designed things
Bad science tells us how things designed themselves

Yep, that's about it. Good science vs. bad science.

Good science...good...good science. *pats Bible*

Bad science...bad...bad...bad science. *smacks biology text*

 

[A4C]

In addition, science is the study of the physical. Whether good or bad, it can make no comment about God at all. This is akin to trying to measure the distance between Sydney and Melbourne using the first six bars of Beethoven's 5th.

Then there are good refutations and there are bad refutations

 

[Praxiteles]

Then there are good refutations and there are bad refutations

Indeed. Beautiful use of the word.

 

[AnEmpiricalAgnostic]

Full marks to you, A4C. You truly are great fun to spar with.

http://www.cheapaschips.com.au/Images/ProductImages/Photos/TA2049.jpg

 

[Praxiteles]

http://www.cheapaschips.com.au/Images/ProductImages/Photos/TA2049.jpg

Did you mean to say

?

 

[A4C]

I must have an "anti YEC mocking" firewall or something 'cause I have no idea what that pic is about

 

[In A Perfect World]

I must have an "anti YEC mocking" firewall or something 'cause I have no idea what that pic is about

It's about the fact you are ashamed of some of your genetic relatives and feel degraded to be compared with them, so you create a strawmen in which they are placed as your ancestors further displaying you animosity towards primates.

 

[mikeynov]

Unless the Big Bang occured, why are we here? The atheists don't have a replacement theory based on REAL evidence.

Your ignorance is mind-numbing.

Apparently you know nothing about evolution or the big bang, despite having been corrected in this forum a large number of times. One can safely conclude you are either incapable of learning or unwilling to do so.

What's particularly ironic is that a theist proposed the big bang - the "atheist" model was the steady state universe disproved over half a century ago.

In summary - you're not even a good creationist.

 

[A4C]

It's about the fact you are ashamed of some of your genetic relatives and feel degraded to be compared with them, so you create a strawmen in which they are placed as your ancestors further displaying you animosity towards primates.

I have nothing against monkeys. I am just not too partial to those who say we come from them.

 

[In A Perfect World]

I have nothing against monkeys. I am just not too partial to those who say we come from them.

Hate the sin, not the sinner? Guess that doesn't apply here?