- May 19, 2015
- 125,550
- 28,531
- 74
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Thank you. So you are a Partial Preterist and therefore view 2 different Parousia events in Matt 24? Just curious.OK I did that.

http://www.preteristsite.com/plain/warrenend.html
*snip*
one view holds that there is a break in Matthew 24 beginning with either verse 35 or 36 [Switch-On],
and another that holds that the entire enchilada primarily belongs to the first century [Switch-Off].
Here is a quote from Gentry (this is an example of switch on)
Contextual evidence suggests that Christ is distinguishing two different comings [in Matthew 24-25]. One coming is his coming upon Jerusalem in temporal judgment to end the old covenant era; the other is his coming at the Second Advent in final judgment to end history (24:36ff).
These two comings are theologically related while historically distinct. (emphasis in original) Kenneth Gentry, Perilous Times ,88-91
So in Gentry's mind the parousia of Matt. 24:27 (because it occurs before v. 36) is a metaphorical judgment coming at AD 70 and the parousia of Matt 24:37 and 39 is the literal end of time Second Advent. For my money, it would be very strange indeed if Jesus was changing what he meant by his parousia midway through the Olivet Discourse.
Upvote
0