DailyBlessings
O Christianos Cryptos; Amor Vincit Omnia!
- Oct 21, 2004
- 17,775
- 983
- 39
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Substantiate my experience of humanity with what? More testimony? In general, I'd say my current colleagues in the seminary are no more or less prone to breaches of ethics in academic practice than my former colleagues in the scientific world. It's true that I don't have any factual data to back that up, so treat it as you would any anecdotal evidence.Care to substantiate that?
Call me prejudiced, but I have a tendency to give the kind of person responsible for my health, my entertainment and the computer I type this on the benefit of the doubt...
I note that I was responding to a comment that swept with a similarly broad brush. Much like yours, which seems to attach god-like qualities to anyone who picks up a clipboard. Science succeeds because its method is good, not because the people who practice it are virtuous, intelligent, and beneficient. Shall I sweep aside your comment with an assertion using similar logic, that I am more willing to give the benefit of a doubt to the people who present the most meaningful understanding of life to me? A computer or ten years of life are only as good as the person who's using them, and how, in my book.
But as I've already pointed out, I'm not arguing that any particular group of people is better, just that I consider all people to be made of more or less the same stuff, at least in numbers. I've never known statements such as "x people are categorically better because they believe in x" to be substantiated by anything except prejudice, and it can be a very dangerous condition to live in. Weighting your consideration someone tells you by virtue of their ethnicity, creed, position, or source of authority is a perilous condition for any human being.
Upvote
0