• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How I came to embrace Preterism.

Status
Not open for further replies.

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
70
Visit site
✟34,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Strong's Number: 726 Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
aJrpavzw from a derivative of (138)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Harpazo 1:472,80
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
har-pad'-zo Verb

Definition
to seize, carry off by force
to seize on, claim for one's self eagerly
to snatch out or away


King James Word Usage - Total: 13
catch up 4, take by force 3, catch away 2, pluck 2, catch 1, pull 1

As 'catch up' seems to be used the most, I'll take that as the definition. :p

'pluck' is a good one too.

http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/NewTestamentGreek/grk.cgi?number=726

<><
 
Upvote 0

EchoPneuma

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,581
98
81
In a galaxy far far away...
✟3,335.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
daneel said:
Strong's Number: 726 Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
aJrpavzw from a derivative of (138)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Harpazo 1:472,80
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
har-pad'-zo Verb

Definition
to seize, carry off by force
to seize on, claim for one's self eagerly
to snatch out or away


King James Word Usage - Total: 13
catch up 4, take by force 3, catch away 2, pluck 2, catch 1, pull 1

As 'catch up' seems to be used the most, I'll take that as the definition. :p

'pluck' is a good one too.

http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/NewTestamentGreek/grk.cgi?number=726

<><

That's your perogative:thumbsup: . Just know that it's not the true meaning of the greek word that Paul used. KJV translators in 1611 were all futurists. There WAS a bias there when they translated that word. IMO:p .

And now.....adieu...until the next debate:wave:
 
Upvote 0

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
70
Visit site
✟34,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Strong's Number: 3625 Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
oijkoumevnh feminine participle present passive of (3611) (as noun, by implication of (1093))
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Oikoumene 5:157,674
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
oy-kou-men'-ay Noun Feminine

Definition
the inhabited earth
the portion of the earth inhabited by the Greeks, in distinction from the lands of the barbarians
the Roman empire, all the subjects of the empire
the whole inhabited earth, the world
the inhabitants of the earth, men
the universe, the world

http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/NewTestamentGreek/grk.cgi?number=3625

Mat 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be proclaimed in all the world as a witness to all nations. And then the end shall come.

Question: What does He mean by "the end shall come?"

Mar 13:26 And then they will see the Son of Man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
Mar 13:27 And then He shall send His angels and shall gather His elect from the four winds, from the end of the earth to the end of heaven.

Does the 'end of the earth to the end of heaven' refer also to the Roman empire?

<><
 
Upvote 0

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
70
Visit site
✟34,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
EchoPneuma said:
That's your perogative:thumbsup: . Just know that it's not the true meaning of the greek word that Paul used. KJV translators in 1611 were all futurists. There WAS a bias there when they translated that word. IMO:p .

And now.....adieu...until the next debate:wave:


Of course they were futurists.....Jesus has'nt returned yet ;)

:wave:

<><
 
Upvote 0

EchoPneuma

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,581
98
81
In a galaxy far far away...
✟3,335.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
daneel said:
Strong's Number: 3625 Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
oijkoumevnh feminine participle present passive of (3611) (as noun, by implication of (1093))
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Oikoumene 5:157,674
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
oy-kou-men'-ay Noun Feminine

Definition
the inhabited earth
the portion of the earth inhabited by the Greeks, in distinction from the lands of the barbarians
the Roman empire, all the subjects of the empire
the whole inhabited earth, the world
the inhabitants of the earth, men
the universe, the world

http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/NewTestamentGreek/grk.cgi?number=3625

Mat 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be proclaimed in all the world as a witness to all nations. And then the end shall come.

Question: What does He mean by "the end shall come?"

And here I thought that you were ready for the debate to end;) .

Jesus was talking to Jews. Throughout the OT there were prophecies concerning God's ultimate judgement against them and that their nation would be ultimately destroyed and they would be exiled to all nations. That is the "end" that was coming. THe Jews never had ANY concept about the end of time or the end of the physical world. But they had CENTURIES of the concept, from the prophets, of an "end" to their nation and religion.

So Jesus was saying that the gospel message was going to go out to the entire known world of that day, as a witness to all those nations, and THEN the end of the Old Covenant and the nation of Israel would come. And that is exactly what happened. The apostles spread the gospel message to the uttermost parts of the empire and among the gentiles and it was bearing fruit "all over the world".....and THEN the end came in 70AD....just like Jesus said.

Does the 'end of the earth to the end of heaven' refer also to the Roman empire?

What are you referring to? A particular scripture?
 
Upvote 0

EchoPneuma

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,581
98
81
In a galaxy far far away...
✟3,335.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
daneel said:
Of course they were futurists.....Jesus has'nt returned yet ;)

:wave:

<><

GOTCHA! Actually they weren't futurists. Dispensationist futurism is only from around 1820. They were probably amillenialists. Your beliefs and interpretation of Revelation is only about 175 yrs old. It's relatively new. It's called Darbyism.

And you really DON'T believe that Jesus is here with us? You think He's still up in heaven and isnt here with us now?
 
Upvote 0

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
70
Visit site
✟34,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What are you referring to? A particular scripture?

Yes, Mar 13:26,27......it's clearly visible to you, to be seen with all eyes, coming in a cloud.....post #283 :D bottom of page

And here I thought that you were ready for the debate to end .

nope. that was you.....


And you really DON'T believe that Jesus is here with us? You think He's still up in heaven and isnt here with us now?

Depends on what you mean ....

But Jesus did tell the disciples the He would always be with them and never forsake them. But then, that was before 70 also.

But then, He was only talking to the disciples and not us, correct?

<><
 
Upvote 0

EchoPneuma

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,581
98
81
In a galaxy far far away...
✟3,335.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
daneel said:
Yes, Mar 13:26,27......it's clearly visible to you, to be seen with all eyes, coming in a cloud.....post #283 :D bottom of page

Look at how "clouds" is used by the Jewish prophets....and yet God NEVER showed up physically.
Deuteronomy 33:26
"There is no one like the God of Jeshurun, who rides on the heavens to help you and on the clouds in his majesty.
Job 22:14
Thick clouds veil him, so he does not see us as he goes about in the vaulted heavens
Job 37:13
He brings the clouds to punish men, or to water his earth and show his love.
Psalm 18:12
Out of the brightness of his presence clouds advanced, with hailstones and bolts of lightning.
Psalm 68:4
Sing to God, sing praise to his name, extol him who rides on the clouds — his name is the LORD— and rejoice before him.
Psalm 97:2
Clouds and thick darkness surround him; righteousness and justice are the foundation of his throne.
Psalm 104:3
and lays the beams of his upper chambers on their waters. He makes the clouds his chariot and rides on the wings of the wind.
Jeremiah 4:13
Look! He advances like the clouds, his chariots come like a whirlwind, his horses are swifter than eagles. Woe to us! We are ruined!
Ezekiel 30:3
For the day is near, the day of the LORD is near— a day of clouds, a time of doom for the nations
Ezekiel 30:18
Dark will be the day at Tahpanhes when I break the yoke of Egypt; there her proud strength will come to an end. She will be covered with clouds, and her villages will go into captivity.
Daniel 7:13
"In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence.
Joel 2:2
a day of darkness and gloom, a day of clouds and blackness. Like dawn spreading across the mountains a large and mighty army comes, such as never was of old nor ever will be in ages to come.
Zephaniah 1:15
That day will be a day of wrath, a day of distress and anguish, a day of trouble and ruin, a day of darkness and gloom, a day of clouds and blackness

The "cloud" imagery was the OT prophetic way of saying that God was going to wreak his vengeance and pour out judgement on a nation. God is said to "ride on the clouds" and be "Coming in the clouds".....but God never showed up physically. So when the NT prophets (including Jesus) talk about Him coming "in the clouds" it doesn't mean He is going to show up physically in literal clouds. It's the same Jewish prophetic imagery that the OT prophets used. Remember, these are ALL JEWS we're talking about. They understood EXACTLY what Jesus meant when He said He was "coming in the clouds". THey knew He meant that He was going to pour out judgement on them.


nope. that was you.....

Oh no, not me. I live for the debate. I just assumed (wrongly) that you were tired of it. My mistake. Shall we continue?:clap:

Depends on what you mean ....

I mean what I asked. Do you really believe Jesus is still up in heaven and hasn't returned to be with us yet? I'm not talking about the Holy Spirit. I'm talking about Jesus Himself. Do you believe He is still in heaven and not here with us?

But Jesus did tell the disciples the He would always be with them and never forsake them. But then, that was before 70 also.

Yes, He did. He also said :

John 16:7
But I tell you the truth: It is for your good that I am going away. Unless I go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you


But then, He was only talking to the disciples and not us, correct?

Hey, now you're getting it. Yes, He was talking to the disciples. He was telling them that even though He was going away for a while (40 years) that He was sending them another comforter who would be with them until He returned. So therefore, He wasn't leaving them or forsaking them. They wouldn't be alone for those 40 years of "wilderness wandering". God the Spirit would be with them (just like the cloud was with them in the desert of Sinai in the OT for 40 years) as a deposit guaranteeing what was to come..... And just like the OT Yeshua (Joshua) after 40 years led them into the Promised Land, the NT Yeshua (Jesus) after 40 years came back and led HIS children into the spiritual Promised Land.......the Eternal Kingdom.:clap: Since then it has been a spiritual reality and ever increasing kingdom.

Now, all a person has to do to enter the Kingdom is turn to Jesus in faith and seek forgiveness.
 
Upvote 0

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
70
Visit site
✟34,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I mean what I asked. Do you really believe Jesus is still up in heaven and hasn't returned to be with us yet? I'm not talking about the Holy Spirit. I'm talking about Jesus Himself. Do you believe He is still in heaven and not here with us?

Jesus has not yet returned. When was the millenial reign?

Hey, now you're getting it. Yes, He was talking to the disciples.

So how much more Scripture is invalid today? If Jesus only talked to the disiples of the day, then it is only valid for them? and them only? You understand of course, that if this is the approach taken, one can pick and choose to fit ones beliefs.

I find that, as the bible tells us, "all Scripture is God breathed", and good for a lot of things. What Paul may have written Timothy is valid for todays church leaders. What Jesus said to the disciples is good to go for the christians of today. As those who are christians are aka disciples.

I can also take the approach in this debate and say what Paul wrote to Timothy is invalid and has no meaning for today. And what Jesus told John to write to the 7 churches was only valid for them.

Now, all a person has to do to enter the Kingdom is turn to Jesus in faith and seek forgiveness.

This has not changed since Christ Jesus was resurrected. And this was before 70ad.


<><
 
Upvote 0

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
70
Visit site
✟34,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
By "in full bloom" I mean fully functioning. We haven't been delivered from it yet. It's still in effect in our bodies. But you are correct that it no longer has mastery over us. Jesus has broken the power of the old sin nature in us. Now we sin because we CHOOSE to , not because we are a slave to it.

agreed


daneel quotes:
I already did. It was in regards to the temple and offering of animals till 70 ad that is false.

echopneuma quotes:

What is false? Josephus said they were offered right up until the temple was destroyed. It's history.

If God wouldn't have accepted those sacrifices, that He had COMMANDED the Jews to offer, then God would have lied to them. Remember, the Jews knew that as long as the temple stood that they had the command from God to go there and offer sacrifices.

The Jews rejected Jesus of whom was foretold of in the Scriptures. It is not God who lied to them, it is they who rejected God.

If the temple still stood, and yet God refused to accept those sacrifices it would make God a liar in the eyes of a Jew.

see my last statement.

So that is why it was SO important for Jesus to destroy the earthly temple. That's why His prophecy in Luke 21 was so significant. Because when the temple was destroyed, God was showing them that the Old Covenant was GONE. That He no longer accepted those sacrifices because He destroyed the temple.

YOu have to look at this through Jewish eyes to see the significance.

No. We have to look through God's perspective to see the significance.

I don't believe this, in any way, conflicts with the gospel message. Jesus death, burial and resurrection paid for sins (it is finished) and then God gave that generation of Jews a chance to repent and follow Him (40 years of grace) before He destroyed it all.............as the sign to apostate Israel that Jesus really WAS the sacrifice that ended all sacrifices.

And a wicked generation saw many signs and wonders and still rejected Jesus.

The jews may have still offered sacrifices till its destruction, but it was a worthless endeavor.

<><
 
Upvote 0

EchoPneuma

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,581
98
81
In a galaxy far far away...
✟3,335.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
daneel said:

Hey, now we're getting somewhere:thumbsup:


The Jews rejected Jesus of whom was foretold of in the Scriptures. It is not God who lied to them, it is they who rejected God.

No, you have to look at this through the eyes of those Jews. This is all about the JEWISH Old Covenant coming to an end. That's what it is all about. That OT covenant was to JEWS. It was their light and life. It was all they had to help them relate to God. They had the law COMMANDING them to go to the TEMPLE IN JERUSALEM and offer sacrifices for their sins. So as long as that temple stood they were supposed to go there. Yes, Jesus died to pay for sins and finished that work on the cross, but the Jews as a nation had no evidence that His claims were true because the temple still stood and the LAW said that they MUST go to the temple and offer sacrifices.

That's why Jesus said that not one JOT OR TITTLE WOULD PASS FROM THE LAW until ALL was fulfilled.

Then look at this scripture in Luke 21 where He is talking about the temple and Jerusalem being destroyed:
Luke 21:21-23 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. 22For this is the time of punishment IN FULFILLMENT OF ALL THAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN23How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land and wrath against this people.


Jesus said that the time of punishment when the temple and nation was destroyed would fulfill ALL that had been written.....meaning all the OT law and prophecies. So, since Jesus said that not one jot or tittle would pass from the law until ALL was fulfilled and then He says that the time of punishement would fulfill ALL of it.....then the time of punishment if when the law passed away for a Jew.

That means that right up until that time, for a Jew, the law had still not passed away yet and therefore they were still COMMANDED to go to the temple and offer sacrifices. The law was still in effect.

Once again, that is why the temple and nation being destroyed was so significant for them, because it showed them that their law was ALL fulfilled and God's wrath had finally come and it showed them that the sacrificial system was OVER and Jesus was vinidcated as the true Messiah because His prophecies had come true.


No. We have to look through God's perspective to see the significance.

No, you have to look at it through the OT Jewish law that was still in effect until it was all fulfilled. The law was binding until it was ALL fulfilled. Jesus said it was ALL fulfilled when the temple and nation was destroyed during the time of punishment. That IS God's perspective according to Jesus.

And a wicked generation saw many signs and wonders and still rejected Jesus.

Yes they did. And what is your point? The temple being destroyed wasn't just a sign, it was the fulfillment of ALL that had been written according to Jesus. It was the ultimate word to a Jew that the Old Covenant was OVER. Remember, they had their OT prophecies for centuries telling them that this day was coming one day. Then Jesus comes along and says that the time of punishment was in "Fulfillment of all that has been written".

The jews may have still offered sacrifices till its destruction, but it was a worthless endeavor.

Well, according to Hebrews, the offering of the OT sacrifices was ALWAYS a worthless endeavor. That God was never satisfied with them.....yet He REQUIRED them according to the law. Look: Hebrews 10 -

4because it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.
5Therefore, when Christ came into the world, he said:
"Sacrifice and offering you did not desire,
but a body you prepared for me;
6with burnt offerings and sin offerings
you were not pleased.
7Then I said, 'Here I am—it is written about me in the scroll—
I have come to do your will, O God.' " 8First he said, "Sacrifices and offerings, burnt offerings and sin offerings you did not desire, nor were you pleased with them" (although the law required them to be made). 9Then he said, "Here I am, I have come to do your will."

See? God was never satisfied with those sacrifices but the LAW REQUIRED THEM TO BE MADE. The same LAW that was in effect until it was all fulfilled when the temple was destroyed. So,you're right, God didn't accept those sacrifices, but the LAW STILL REQUIRED THEM FROM THE JEWS until it was fulfilled because Jesus said that not one jot or tittle would pass from it until ALL was fulfilled. And it was ALL fulfilled during the time of punishment in 70AD according to Jesus.

Siince 70AD, NOT ONE temple sacrifice has been offered by a Jew. WHY? Because all the OT law was fulfilled by the temple's destruction and the nation being exiled.

Jewish rabbis today will tell you that 70AD was the changing of Judaism from BIBLICAL Judaism to Rabbinic Judaism. They all admit that what they practice today is NOT biblical Judaism.....BECAUSE there is NO TEMPLE to offer sacrifices in.

A friend of mine who is a Jew said this very thing was what led him to Christ. He said that since the law commanded that they, as Jews, had to offer their sacrifices of atonement at the temple in Jerusalem, and yet God had allowed it to be destroyed and it had never been rebuilt, then God MUST have provided ANOTHER WAY for their sins to be forgiven. He wouldn't just leave them with no way to have their sins forgiven. And he began to search for that "other way"....and found Jesus the lamb of God.

That would have never happened if the temple would have remained in Jerusalem. He would have, like a good Jew, gone there and offered his sacrifices IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW and believed that they were forgiven. THe temple being destroyed was what showed him that the OT law couldn't be in effect any longer. That God had provided another way.

That is the significance of it to a Jew.

For a Gentile, like you and I (I assume you are) it's not that relevant. We simply accept that Jesus was the sacrifice for our sins. BUt then WE were never under the OT law of sacrifices LIKE A JEW WAS.

The bible says "salvation if of the Jews". So it all has to be looked at through those glasses.


<><[/QUOTE]
 
Upvote 0

EchoPneuma

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,581
98
81
In a galaxy far far away...
✟3,335.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
drstevej said:
This is an excellent discussion. I appreciate the tone of the participants.
Thanks,

Steve

Yes, it is an excellent discussion. I also appreciate Daneel (and others) being patient with my sometimes less than articulate bloviating;)
 
Upvote 0

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
70
Visit site
✟34,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, you have to look at this through the eyes of those Jews. This is all about the JEWISH Old Covenant coming to an end. That's what it is all about. That OT covenant was to JEWS. It was their light and life. It was all they had to help them relate to God. Yes, Jesus died to pay for sins and finished that work on the cross, but the Jews as a nation had no evidence that His claims were true because the temple still stood and the LAW said that they MUST go to the temple and offer sacrifices.

That's why Jesus said that not one JOT OR TITTLE WOULD PASS FROM THE LAW until ALL was fulfilled.

No. You need to look through the perspective of God.

1. Jesus fulfilled it.
2. Jesus said, "It is finished".
3. Jesus completed the Fathers will.

They had the law COMMANDING them to go to the TEMPLE IN JERUSALEM and offer sacrifices for their sins. So as long as that temple stood they were supposed to go there.

Yes, the LAW commanded them to go there. They also had the Scriptures that foretold of the Christ. They had the Christ in front of them and totally rejected Him.

The jews had obvious proof that the Messiah had come. It is with such hardness of heart they rejected Him.

Grace would now abound, and the Law was done away. The new covenant for Israel.
The Old covenant was done away.


Luke 21:21-23 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. 22For this is the time of punishment IN FULFILLMENT OF ALL THAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN23How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land and wrath against this people.

You're going to need to differentiate between what Jesus fulfilled and what prophecy regarding the wrath of God is fulfilled. It does'nt add validity to temple worship and sacrifice there.

The difference between temple stuff and Grace is Jesus.

No, you have to look at it through the OT Jewish law that was still in effect until it was all fulfilled. The law was binding until it was ALL fulfilled. Jesus said it was ALL fulfilled when the temple and nation was destroyed during the time of punishment. That IS God's perspective according to Jesus.

Ok....can you show me where any of the disciples or Paul went to the temple to offer sacrifices? THey went to the temple to preach, yes.

Did Paul teach of the Law still in full effect? Or did he teach something else?

Well, according to Hebrews, the offering of the OT sacrifices was ALWAYS a worthless endeavor. That God was never satisfied with them.....yet He REQUIRED them according to the law. Look: Hebrews 10 -

Still, the unblemished Lamb of God had pleased God.


Siince 70AD, NOT ONE temple sacrifice has been offered by a Jew. WHY? Because all the OT law was fulfilled by the temple's destruction and the nation being exiled.

Jewish rabbis today will tell you that 70AD was the changing of Judaism from BIBLICAL Judaism to Rabbinic Judaism. They all admit that what they practice today is NOT biblical Judaism.....BECAUSE there is NO TEMPLE to offer sacrifices in.

A friend of mine who is a Jew said this very thing was what led him to Christ. He said that since the law commanded that they, as Jews, had to offer their sacrifices of atonement at the temple in Jerusalem, and yet God had allowed it to be destroyed and it had never been rebuilt, then God MUST have provided ANOTHER WAY for their sins to be forgiven. He wouldn't just leave them with no way to have their sins forgiven. And he began to search for that "other way"....and found Jesus the lamb of God.

That would have never happened if the temple would have remained in Jerusalem. He would have, like a good Jew, gone there and offered his sacrifices IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW and believed that they were forgiven. THe temple being destroyed was what showed him that the OT law couldn't be in effect any longer. That God had provided another way.

That is the significance of it to a Jew.

There is some significance when Jesus asked, "Who do people say I am?" And it was Peter who said, "You are the Son of God."

You're forgetting that many Jews were converted by Jesus in His time. Many heard and followed.

But there are many who heard and did'nt follow.

Do you really think those that heard Him, saw Him, and rejected Him have validity in God's eyes for validity in temple stuff???


For a Gentile, like you and I (I assume you are) it's not that relevant. We simply accept that Jesus was the sacrifice for our sins. BUt then WE were never under the OT law of sacrifices LIKE A JEW WAS.

The bible says "salvation if of the Jews". So it all has to be looked at through those glasses.

No, salvation is for 'whosoever'. We have a much larger perspective with which to see.

The Jews expected the Messiah. Their perspective was quite limited with Him standing in front of them. Their rejection of Him through hardness of heart gives no validity in God's eyes as to temple stuff.

Salvation is for all, both Jew and Gentile.

<><
 
Upvote 0

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
70
Visit site
✟34,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Paul, before being regenerated by the Holy Spirit, is an example of someone who thought the Law still intact. He persecuted the christians. He had heard in whom the christians believed.

In Pauls perception he was doing the right thing. Still going to the Temple. Still doing the things of the Temple. Still proclaiming the Law.

Till Jesus bonked him on the head while he was walking down the road one day.......

:)

<><
 
Upvote 0

EchoPneuma

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,581
98
81
In a galaxy far far away...
✟3,335.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
daneel said:
No. You need to look through the perspective of God.

1. Jesus fulfilled it.
2. Jesus said, "It is finished".
3. Jesus completed the Fathers will.

I AM looking at it throught the perspective of God. It was Jesus that said that not one jot or tittle of the law would pass away until ALL was fulfilled. Then He said that the time of punishment was to fulfill ALL that had been written. How can you interpret that any other way. What do you think the ALL was? He said "ALL THAT'S BEEN WRITTEN". Doesn't that mean the OT scriptures?

Yes, the LAW commanded them to go there. They also had the Scriptures that foretold of the Christ. They had the Christ in front of them and totally rejected Him.

What you're not getting is that as long as the law was in effect for those UNBELIEVING Jews, they had the command of God to go and offer sacrifices. God had to show them that the LAW was GONE. They had no reason to believe Jesus was the true sacrifice of God if the temple still stood. Stop and look at this through Jewish eyes.

The jews had obvious proof that the Messiah had come. It is with such hardness of heart they rejected Him.

It is obvious proof to US....but not to a 1st century Jew. They had the LAW that commanded them to go to the TEMPLE. They weren't going to just abandon the law without some kind of proof that Jesus was really the sacrifice of God. Lots of Jewish zealots of that time died on Roman crosses. That didn't make Him special. Even Him rising from the dead didn't do it for them.....since the bible records that many OT saints rose from the dead when Jesus was on the cross. It took something MORE for those Jews to see. The Day of Pentecost opened alot of eyes...but still the nation as a whole rejected Him. BUt when Jesus destroyed the temple and nation in 70AD....THAT was God's final word to the JEWS that there was ANOTHER WAY to forgiveness besides the temple sacrifices. That was the FULFILLMENT of ALL THAT HAD BEEN WRITTEN.....therefore the law (old covenant) could now pass away

Grace would now abound, and the Law was done away. The new covenant for Israel.
The Old covenant was done away.

Can you show me where it says that the old covenant was done away with when Jesus died on the cross. In Hebrews (which was written AFTER the death, burial, resurrection and ascension of Jesus) it says in chapter 8 in regards to the old covenant...

7For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another. 8But God found fault with the people and said:
"The time is coming, declares the Lord,
when I will make a new covenant
with the house of Israel
and with the house of Judah.
9It will not be like the covenant
I made with their forefathers
when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of Egypt,
because they did not remain faithful to my covenant,
and I turned away from them, declares the Lord.
10This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel
after that time, declares the Lord.
I will put my laws in their minds
and write them on their hearts.
I will be their God,
and they will be my people.
11No longer will a man teach his neighbor,
or a man his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord,'
because they will all know me,
from the least of them to the greatest.
12For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more."
13By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.

Notice Paul doesn't say it HAS disappeared, but that it will SOON disappear. He was talking about the Old Covenant. He says that God has made it obsolete and since it is obsolete it will SOON DISAPPEAR. So at that point it had not yet disappeared.....and this was written after Jesus had already ascended to heaven.

You're going to need to differentiate between what Jesus fulfilled and what prophecy regarding the wrath of God is fulfilled. It does'nt add validity to temple worship and sacrifice there.

Jesus said the time of punishment was IN FULFILLMENT OF ALL THAT'S BEEN WRITTEN. He didn't say some, or most, or certain prophecies or only prophecies regarding the wrath of God....He said that when the punishment occurred that it would FULFILL IT ALL. Yes, Jesus fulfilled MANY of the prophecies and ALL of them concerning the Messiah were fulfilled by Him, but there were MANY MORE prophecies than just those. The OT prophecies surrounding the coming of Messiah also talked about a time of great wrath and judgement....when God would set up His eternal kingdom. THOSE prophecies had to be fulfilled as well, before the law could pass away. Jesus said not ONE JOT OR TITTLE WOULD PASS FROM THE LAW UNTIL ALL WAS FULFILLED. That happened in 70AD.

The difference between temple stuff and Grace is Jesus

The difference between temple "stuff" and grace, according to scripture was that ALL the law had to be fulfilled so that the New Covenant of grace could be ushered in. Jesus said it was ALL fulfilled in 70AD.

Ok....can you show me where any of the disciples or Paul went to the temple to offer sacrifices? THey went to the temple to preach, yes.

Can you show me where they did NOT offer any sacrifices when they went? Even Jesus was baptized to "fulfill all righteousness". That was according to the OT law. Why would He subject Himself to the OT law if He didn't expect His disciples to? Until the law "passed away" it was still in effect. It couldn't pass away until it was ALL fulfilled (according to Jesus)....and it was ALL fulfilled during the time of punishment (according to Jesus)....hence THAT is when it passed away....in 70AD at the fall of the temple.

Hey, I'm just going with what Jesus plainly says. I don't try to ignore what He says and run with something else.

Did Paul teach of the Law still in full effect? Or did he teach something else?

He taught it was soon to pass away according to the verses in Hebrews I posted above. He said that Jesus nailed it to the cross. He said that faith actually uphold the law. He tells Christians that they are no longer under the supervision of the law....but NOWHERE does he say that the OT law had all been fulfilled or that it had passed away. As a matter of fact in Hebrews he says that it will "soon pass away". It did.....15 or so years later.

Still, the unblemished Lamb of God had pleased God.

Yes, He did. God was NEVER pleased with the OT sacrifices yet THE LAW DEMANDED THEM.

There is some significance when Jesus asked, "Who do people say I am?" And it was Peter who said, "You are the Son of God."

Much significance. Your point?

You're forgetting that many Jews were converted by Jesus in His time. Many heard and followed.

But there are many who heard and did'nt follow.

Do you really think those that heard Him, saw Him, and rejected Him have validity in God's eyes for validity in temple stuff???

I'm not forgetting it. I know many heard and believed. But the nation as a whole had MANY prophecies that had to be fulfilled for Jesus to be proven as the true Messiah. ALL the OT had to be fulfilled or the law couldn't pass away.

And NO, I told you that God wasn't pleased or satisfied with the temple sacrifices EVER....but the LAW DEMANDED THEM. THe Jews HAD TO OBEY THE LAW until it passed away and was fulfilled. Jesus said that happened during the time of punishment.

No, salvation is for 'whosoever'. We have a much larger perspective with which to see.

Of course salvation is for whoever. I never said it wasn't. But that salvation wasn't taken to the Gentiles until Jesus had already ascended and then He appeared to Paul and gave him a special commission to go to the Gentiles.

The Jews expected the Messiah. Their perspective was quite limited with Him standing in front of them. Their rejection of Him through hardness of heart gives no validity in God's eyes as to temple stuff.

You are wrong. The law demanded that they continue to offer the sacrifices. THey had prophecies concerning the time of the end and the time of wrath. THose had to be fulfilled before the law could pass away and the new covenant could come. You need to look at this from a Jewish point of view.

Salvation is for all, both Jew and Gentile.

I didn't say otherwise. I said salvation is OF the Jews....not just FOR the Jews. Look it up.....it's what the bible says.

<><[/QUOTE]
 
Upvote 0

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
70
Visit site
✟34,392.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I AM looking at it throught the perspective of God. It was Jesus that said that not one jot or tittle of the law would pass away until ALL was fulfilled. Then He said that the time of punishment was to fulfill ALL that had been written. How can you interpret that any other way. What do you think the ALL was? He said "ALL THAT'S BEEN WRITTEN". Doesn't that mean the OT scriptures?

Let's look at what Jesus said:

Mat 5:17 Do not think that I have come to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to destroy but to fulfill.
Mat 5:18 For truly I say to you, Till the heaven and the earth pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall in any way pass from the Law until all is fulfilled.

Notice He says 'from the Law'.

Not from 'All that is written'.

By yielding Himself fully to the Law, the moral intent of the Law, He fulfilled it.


What you're not getting is that as long as the law was in effect for those UNBELIEVING Jews, they had the command of God to go and offer sacrifices. God had to show them that the LAW was GONE. They had no reason to believe Jesus was the true sacrifice of God if the temple still stood. Stop and look at this through Jewish eyes.

The Scriptures still show of the Messiah, of whom they rejected. Yes, they had no reason to believe Jesus in THEIR eyes. Their eyes were blinded by the LIght. They chose the Temple, and did not choose Jesus.

We know that some Jews rejected and some received Jesus.

Again, is unbelief validation in God's eyes?

It is obvious proof to US....but not to a 1st century Jew. They had the LAW that commanded them to go to the TEMPLE. They weren't going to just abandon the law without some kind of proof that Jesus was really the sacrifice of God. Lots of Jewish zealots of that time died on Roman crosses. That didn't make Him special. Even Him rising from the dead didn't do it for them.....since the bible records that many OT saints rose from the dead when Jesus was on the cross. It took something MORE for those Jews to see. The Day of Pentecost opened alot of eyes...but still the nation as a whole rejected Him. BUt when Jesus destroyed the temple and nation in 70AD....THAT was God's final word to the JEWS that there was ANOTHER WAY to forgiveness besides the temple sacrifices. That was the FULFILLMENT of ALL THAT HAD BEEN WRITTEN.....therefore the law (old covenant) could now pass away

Many heard and refused. The disiples of Jesus heard and accepted.

To my understanding there are still Jews today who are waiting for the Messiah?

Can you show me where it says that the old covenant was done away with when Jesus died on the cross. In Hebrews (which was written AFTER the death, burial, resurrection and ascension of Jesus) it says in chapter 8 in regards to the old covenant...

Yes, Jesus said, "It is finished".

Notice Paul doesn't say it HAS disappeared, but that it will SOON disappear. He was talking about the Old Covenant. He says that God has made it obsolete and since it is obsolete it will SOON DISAPPEAR. So at that point it had not yet disappeared.....and this was written after Jesus had already ascended to heaven.

12For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more."
13By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.

Well, it's apparrent from the verse you cited. "The first one obsolete, and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear."

So, temple stuff is obsolete, and what lingers of it will soon disappear....

Nuff said? :p

Can you show me where they did NOT offer any sacrifices when they went? Even Jesus was baptized to "fulfill all righteousness". That was according to the OT law. Why would He subject Himself to the OT law if He didn't expect His disciples to? Until the law "passed away" it was still in effect. It couldn't pass away until it was ALL fulfilled (according to Jesus)....and it was ALL fulfilled during the time of punishment (according to Jesus)....hence THAT is when it passed away....in 70AD at the fall of the temple.


Mat 5:18 For truly I say to you, Till the heaven and the earth pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall in any way pass from the Law until all is fulfilled.

Again, fullfillment of Law. Not fulfillment of all prophecy.


He taught it was soon to pass away according to the verses in Hebrews I posted above. He said that Jesus nailed it to the cross. He said that faith actually uphold the law. He tells Christians that they are no longer under the supervision of the law....but NOWHERE does he say that the OT law had all been fulfilled or that it had passed away. As a matter of fact in Hebrews he says that it will "soon pass away". It did.....15 or so years later.

the old is obsolete and the remnants pass away. But validity of the Law is obsolete, and Grace abounds.
Much significance. Your point?

Regards perspective and who's perspective has all authority.

I'm not forgetting it. I know many heard and believed. But the nation as a whole had MANY prophecies that had to be fulfilled for Jesus to be proven as the true Messiah. ALL the OT had to be fulfilled or the law couldn't pass away.

This goes back to Jesus fulfilling the Law and not "All the OT".

And NO, I told you that God wasn't pleased or satisfied with the temple sacrifices EVER....but the LAW DEMANDED THEM. THe Jews HAD TO OBEY THE LAW until it passed away and was fulfilled. Jesus said that happened during the time of punishment.

This goes back to Jesus fulfilling the Law and not "All the OT".

You are wrong. The law demanded that they continue to offer the sacrifices. THey had prophecies concerning the time of the end and the time of wrath. THose had to be fulfilled before the law could pass away and the new covenant could come. You need to look at this from a Jewish point of view.


This goes back to Jesus fulfilling the Law and not "All the OT".

I stated earlier that todays Jews are still awaiting the Messiah. Am I correct or all wet? I'm on unfamiliar ground here.

Maybe someone besides Echopneuma and myself can answer?

thanx

:)
 
Upvote 0

EchoPneuma

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,581
98
81
In a galaxy far far away...
✟3,335.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
daneel said:
Let's look at what Jesus said:

Mat 5:17 Do not think that I have come to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to destroy but to fulfill.
Mat 5:18 For truly I say to you, Till the heaven and the earth pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall in any way pass from the Law until all is fulfilled.

Notice He says 'from the Law'.

Not from 'All that is written'.

By yielding Himself fully to the Law, the moral intent of the Law, He fulfilled it.

No, look at it again. He says that NOTHING will pass from the law until ALL has been fulfilled? What do you think the "all" is there? Can't you see that what Jesus says later, tells what the "all" is? He says that the time of punishment will fulfill "all that's been written". Let Jesus interpret Himself. Don't put your own interpretation on it.

So what He is saying is that nothing will pass away from the law until ALL that has been written (the OT) has been fulfilled.




The Scriptures still show of the Messiah, of whom they rejected. Yes, they had no reason to believe Jesus in THEIR eyes. Their eyes were blinded by the LIght. They chose the Temple, and did not choose Jesus.

We know that some Jews rejected and some received Jesus.

Again, is unbelief validation in God's eyes?

THe chose the temple because they were COMMANDED TO BY THE LAW and the law was still in effect.


Many heard and refused. The disiples of Jesus heard and accepted.

To my understanding there are still Jews today who are waiting for the Messiah?

Yes, some Jews are still awaiting Messiah. But MANY have come to Jesus for the exact same reason my friend did.....and he was a 70th generation Levite Jew who had special standing in the Jewish synogogue. But he just COULD NOT reconcile the fact that they didnt have a temple any longer to offer sacrifices in and therefore they had NO WAY to have their sins forgiven. THat dogged him....and began his search for the other way.

Yes, Jesus said, "It is finished".

And you INTERPRET that to mean the end of the law? I believe He meant that what was finished was the atonement for sins? THat the power of sin was finished. Especially in light of the fact that He specifically says that the time of punishment was when "all that's written" would be fulfilled. No where is there any indication in scripture that the law ended at that moment.

12For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more."
13By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.

Well, it's apparrent from the verse you cited. "The first one obsolete, and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear."

So, temple stuff is obsolete, and what lingers of it will soon disappear....

Nuff said? :p

Yeah, I noticed how you just ignored that Paul said (after Jesus had already ascended to heaven) that the old covenant would SOON DISAPPEAR....meaning it was still in effect when Paul wrote that, but it was soon to pass away. Which means it DID NOT end at the cross. It didn't pass away until AFTER Paul wrote the book of Hebrews years after the crucifixion.

Sho nuff said:p


Mat 5:18 For truly I say to you, Till the heaven and the earth pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall in any way pass from the Law until all is fulfilled.

Again, fullfillment of Law. Not fulfillment of all prophecy.

And again...let Jesus interpret Jesus. It's the best way.

the old is obsolete and the remnants pass away. But validity of the Law is obsolete, and Grace abounds.

Yep, the law is obsolete TODAY and has been since 70AD. But when Paul wrote Hebrews it had not yet passed away....it was SOON to pass away. And it did in 70AD. And grace has abounded since Adam and Eve and will forevermore......thank God. :bow:

Regards perspective and who's perspective has all authority.

Well, I would think that Jesus is the authority. That's why I am letting Him interpret Himself and believing what He says to be the truth.

This goes back to Jesus fulfilling the Law and not "All the OT".



This goes back to Jesus fulfilling the Law and not "All the OT".




This goes back to Jesus fulfilling the Law and not "All the OT".

It goes back to Jesus interpreting Jesus as to what the "all" is....and WHEN that "all" would happen. He makes it very clear.

I stated earlier that todays Jews are still awaiting the Messiah. Am I correct or all wet? I'm on unfamiliar ground here.

Maybe someone besides Echopneuma and myself can answer?

thanx

:)

No, there are some Jews who are still waiting for Messiah. Many have turned to Jesus and been saved...but MOST Jews today are atheistic...or deistic. Either believing in God not at all...or believing in A god...but not the God of the bible.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.