Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because science is not perfectly unbiased, that's a goal, not a reality of it at present, given the tendency of pundit groups to pay for "studies" that sound scientific, yet only serve to "prove" some preconception they want to confirm to the addlebrained masses they pander toWhy should it be either wing?
Do you know for a fact there are no mandates or are you just selectively hearing things? Even if there wasn't a state wide mandate, that doesn't mean squat with private businesses. It's not either/or, the mandates are meant to be temporary in nature, not some long term thing like you seem to insinuate hereBut people have and are following basic common sense and distancing and wearing masks right now. I see it every day and since I am fortunate enough to live in a rational state instead of a lockdown crazy state, there ARE NO mandates. About 2/3 are wearing them indoors and keeping distance. And our rates are low.
The misinformation has been spread from the top, pretending that natural immunity never existed, in order to move the product.
Yeah, that capitalist system sure "helped" didn't it?So perhaps it is time to look beyond the divisive nonsense to see what has really been happening in the world compliments of a pandemic?
The comment made in an early stage, something you seem to want to ignore to just say, "See, I told you," while insulting our intelligence and myopically focusing on that aspect instead of WHY he said it and that he changed his mind with new evidence (because that's science)Are you denying that Fauci said not to wear masks? Because that was the comment made and you deflected to this.
Wow that mosque reference takes me back to a time when I was doing blog posts 2x a month or so on current events and that came up. So needlessly reactionary and rooted in xenophobic prejudicesIf it's credible meta-analysis of scientific studies of covid interventions, it shouldn't be either. That's my point. The source site is pure politics (and bigotry) of a rather paranoid style.
The owner of the site (Dr. something or other) has a Ed.D. and is not an expert of any kind on medicine, epidemiology, or statistical analysis. The author of the post (Pam Geller) is also not any of those things either. She rose to "fame" opposing the "Ground Zero Mosque", which was neither at Ground Zero, nor a mosque.
At least "America's Frontline Doctors" have the decency to be practicing physicians while peddling their covid misinformation and paranoia.
When America presents itself as the savior of the free world and postures with so much narcissistic hyperbole and egomania, it seems far more notable, even if it might thankfully be a smaller number versus people tricked in small ways and then realizing they need to be more careful to not send their money to a Nigerian prince or take this deal that's too good to be trueOoo...I don't htink that is an American thing. That is a ignorance thing as most people, I think, don't actually know how much they DON'T know but, as you say, they know enough buzzwords to think they know
Has that been ascertained by fact or comes compliments of a carefully controlled narrative?
Has that been ascertained by fact or comes compliments of a carefully controlled narrative?
As if the narrative has always stuck leaning just right or just left, you're hopelessly naive if you think it was that simple. And the narrative could only be controlled so much in the 80s versus now with the advancement of social media as a means, let's not kid ourselves into thinking things were the same as they were a generation agoHence spending 40 yrs in the White House controlling the narrative?
In a conspiracy theory, which you want to just act like it's equally valid even with no real evidence, just specious grasping at straws and delusions rooted in superstitions and desperation at a world regarding faith as increasingly useless.Sounds like she has personal insight to Clinton home life lol Funny how the elites are considered to be reptilian and deviants.
And you think that's okay as long as we can spin it as a win rather than considering how income inequality is still a growing issue, particularly with stress in regards to medical debt and the like (a problem long before the current ongoing pandemic)? Glad to know you're on the side of profiteers and conglomerates and not the people...except when it can make you seem magnanimous, of course. Then you're all about the grassroots, right?Helped themselves... record breaking profits.
Because everyone totally knew about him 40 years ago. You're pinning this all on one person, which is hopelessly naive yet again, as if your conspiracy wouldn't have had to involve several more people who you seem to be mum about. Or just can't name periodThey were for Fauci which is who i was referring to.
Sorry my sarcasm doesn't convey here, but you're not helping your case by talking about record profits with no specificity to them.You're assumptions are about 180 degrees off.
My mother always said that when you seek to point out asinine accusations in another, ... four fingers are always pointing back at you ...Sounds like she has personal insight to Clinton home life lol Funny how the elites are considered to be reptilian and deviants.