- Oct 12, 2020
- 8,358
- 2,785
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I didn't say it had anything to do with annihilation. But, it certainly refers to being separated away from the presence of God, which your statement blatantly contradicts.I read scripture through a different lens, because of Jesus there is now no separation between God and man, 2 Cor 5:14-15 Jesus died for all therefore all have died, he died for all so that those living might not live for themselves... Jesus by his death bought all humanity back for God he is in all, but most are blind to the fact and live for themselves.
2 Thess 1:9 olethros aionios is not everlasting destruction, that is a bad translation. olethros does not imply annihilation, but the loss that goes with complete undoing, they lose their inheritance, aionios does not mean eternal but pertaining to the age or of the age, they go to the age of punishment because of the loss, they did not follow God in this age.
As for your claim that it's not talking about everlasting destruction, I don't buy your argument at all. When Jesus spoke of "this age" and "the age to come", He differentiated between temporal things of this age and eternal things of the age to come (Luke 20:34-36). So, an age can be eternal.
I follow the teaching of the Holy Spirit by way of the authors of the Bible.I follow the teaching of the early church fathers like Gregory of Nyssa the father of fathers, and others who taught Apokatastasis the renewal of all things, not just a few or small amount.
Why are you twisting scripture to fit your doctrine? You need to deal with scripture honestly. Philippians 2:10-11 absolutely does NOT say every tongue will GLADLY confess that Jesus is Lord. Those who do acknowledge Jesus is Lord in this lifetime when today is the day and now is the time of salvation (2 Corinthians 6:2) will not GLADLY confess that Jesus is Lord. They will SORROWFULLY confess that Jesus is Lord out of regret that they didn't do it when today was the day and now was the time of salvation. It will be too late for them at that point since that will be after the time during which today is the day and now is the time of salvation. With Him being before them in all His glory they will not be able to deny that He is Lord, but they will NOT confess that GLADLY. You are just making that up to fit your doctrine, which is unacceptable.When I read 1 Cor 15:28 and it says God will be all in all, I do not read it as God will be all in a few, Phil 2:10-11 Every knee should bow of those of those in heaven, and those on earth, and those under the earth, and every tongue gladly confess that Jesus is Lord.
What did God force Paul to do there that was against his will? I'm not saying that God never interacts with man, but where are you getting the idea that God forced Paul to do anything against his will?These and other verses that tell the same thing is the foundation of how I read scripture, those who believe in "eternal hell" or annihilation have separation as the foundation and read scripture with a different lense.
So from my standpoint it is not I who is misinterpreting scripture wrong, I stand with the early church fathers, and it is those who read it from separation that are misinterpreting it wrong.
You say God never forces anyone to do anything against their will ? Tell that to Paul who was blinded and was nocked to the ground by God, do you not think God violated Pauls will ?
Upvote
0