No, if something exists outside of human minds and exists irrespective of human feelings, desires, and opinions then it exists objectively. God's valuing of humanity exists outside the mind of humanity and irrespective of any human belief or opinion, therefore it exists objectively.
Human doesn't enter into it. For example, if an alien had certain opinions would that then become objective reality just because a human didn't think of those things?
Things that are objective exist in reality, independent of a mind, or the opinions and views of the being in question.
How do you know this? Not all humans agree with this. What about unborn humans? What about humans in a coma? That is just your subjective opinion based on your brain chemistry brought about by evolution. Stalin believed that the aristocracy and devout Christians deserved to die and be eliminated from society, his belief came from the same sources as yours, how do you know your brain chemistry is right and his is wrong?
Because Stalin's views were objectively harmful to millions of people. Taking a healthy person and killing them is by any reasonable definition harmful to that person.
Likewise, taking a sick person and making them healthy again is objectively helpful to that person, by any reasonable definition.
Morality must be taken on a case by case basis however, as some situations may involve grey areas or other weird conditions, however in general most people have a pretty similar view on right and wrong regardless of their religious views.
I am not taking credit, I am just stating historical facts.
Many Biblical Christians argued against slavery 200 years ago. Most of the leaders of women's suffrage were Christians also. Many Christians argued against segregation 50 years ago.
Many Christians also support same sex marriage, gay rights, and trans rights and have worked to further those causes. However you can't reasonably argue that the overwhelming force trying to keep those people oppressed are Christians acting on religious grounds. If you look into the history of civil rights, from slavery, to segregation to women's rights and more, you'll see a similar story.
However, now, decades in the future when those things are considered settled issues, Christians try to take all the credit. Just as they will for gay and trans rights a few decades down the road.
Here's a great video of a christian pastor proving this very point a few years ago when the gay rights issue was still at the forefront:
It's the exact same thing we're hearing now, almost word for word.
If they argue in favor of special sexual rights for gays then they will be violating orthodox Christian teaching and therefore are unlikely to actually be Christians.
What gay people choose to do in their bedroom is no business of these Christians who wish to legislate against them, therefore they should keep their noses out of other people's sexual lives.
Transgenderism is something different from homosexuality. Science has not quite determined what it is. Most of the evidence points to it being a serious mental illness similar to anorexia since the person cannot seem to recognize reality. When they look in the mirror they see the opposite sex of what they are, just like when an anorexic looks in the mirror and sees a fat version of themselves when they are actually deathly thin. But there is a chance it could be a result of the fall of humanity and a sin distorted world where someone may actually be a female spirit or soul trapped in a male body or vice versa. So how they should be treated is still in flux.
Science is pretty clear on what transgenderism is, and it's nothing like you're describing. I suggest you start getting your science info from scientific texts and not from what your pastor has to say.
We do know that over 80% of children that believe that they are the opposite sex change that believe by the time they become adults. So using surgery and hormonal treatments on children is probably wrong.
I would also generally disagree with someone doing that as well until the person in question is an adult.
No, they are contradictory. Secular humanists can classify some humans as not worth saving from death Such as the very old and very young and very disabled. They don't have an objective standard by which they can be judged and be encouraged to work toward a superior standard because they don't have an objective one.
The objective standard is human wellbeing. If you refuse to save someone from death who can be made healthy and does not wish to die, you have objectively harmed that person. If you save a person in that situation, you have helped them. That is not open to opinion, that is testable and verifiable. If they were going to die, and they are now not going to die, that is an objective improvement in their health.
It's not rocket science.
Devaluation of human life and reduction of first amendment rights to name two things. Indoctrinating of children in public schools to reject America's Christian principles.
Secular humanists don't devalue human life, nor have they reduced your first amendment rights. Try again.
They are more than just God's views on morality, they the moral standard incorporated into the universe and exist outside of human minds, thereby making them objective.
That makes no sense at all. How do you have a moral standard "incorporated into the universe", what does that even mean, and where did it come from?
Did god invent this standard, or did the standard exist independently of god?
Gods morality is based on God's objectively existing moral character. His character exists in reality outside of humanity's mind and beliefs and feelings, therefore it exists objectively.
See above
