How can Hillary Clinton win with 5 pct of the votes?

[MattMarriott]

How can Hillary Clinton win with 5 pct of the votes?
For the 1000th time: EVERYTHING has been explained long ago! (1)
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...y+MattMarriott
The magic: voting machines + the candidate who is supposed to lose.

Notes
(1) Currently #1:
Bush vs. Kerry 2004 was a repetition of the Kerry vs. Dean New Hampshire primary 2003 (1)
http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/s...ad.php?t=14963
goldismoney.info is one of the many forums managed by the CIA Web of Disinfo where Matt Marriott could post for a while.

(2) Reminder: Obama's role is to confirm that illuminati media polls are legit and voting machines count Clinton's votes correctly, no matter what...
http://end-times-computers.blogspot....kobamacom.html
http://illuminati-agenda.blogspot.co...r-dummies.html

(3) Laws of End Times Reductionism explain that the script can not only be repeated at will, but also be reduced each time. Because the audience are dummies, aka sheep quietly being transported to the slaughter.
The same laws which explain that Bush could be reelected with 15 pct support, and 4 years later Hillary Clinton will be elected with 5 pct support. 05-17-2007:
http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/t...sic-facts.html

 

[Harpuia]

...My brain hurts.

I need to find this Illuminati and beat them in a game of Monopoly soon... or I'll be needing a lot more aspirin.

 

[MattMarriott]

In Forum of the Democratic Party not yet censored.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2636193
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3999928
http://www.democraticunderground.co...sg&forum=389&topic_id=2636329&mesg_id=2636329

 

[Kyoon]

The truth is never too horrible.

 

[ScMay]

What is this now? MattMarriott's 1,256th conspiracy theory? You should right a book and buy shares based on your predictions, you'd make a lot of money and when you turn out right everyone will have something to verify against. Until then, you're dreaming if you think any of us will believe a word you have invented.

 

[Scribbler]

I hear the Masons are poisoning the wells, too.

 

[WayWord]

Media Struggles To Whitewash Clinton Vote Fraud Suspicions

CNN A.M. brought up a hint of election fraud only ONCE 1-9-8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcwdKBVt_Ew

 

[ScMay]

Media Struggles To Whitewash Clinton Vote Fraud Suspicions

CNN A.M. brought up a hint of election fraud only ONCE 1-9-8

So some people on blogs suspect that their was vote rigging and a CNN broadcast mentions it briefly. What do you expect? They have no evidence to go on and no credible reason to see it as a likely theory, especially when they have much more likely theories to go with. If there was vote rigging with real suspicions don't you think the other candidates would cry foul, but they haven't have they?

So rather than claim whitewashes and cover-ups can you first provide even a shred of evidence that the N.H. caucus was rigged in the first place?

 

[WayWord]

So some people on blogs suspect that their was vote rigging and a CNN broadcast mentions it briefly. What do you expect? They have no evidence to go on and no credible reason to see it as a likely theory, especially when they have much more likely theories to go with. If there was vote rigging with real suspicions don't you think the other candidates would cry foul, but they haven't have they?

So rather than claim whitewashes and cover-ups can you first provide even a shred of evidence that the N.H. caucus was rigged in the first place?

Why don't you read the article?

 

[Scribbler]

Why don't you read the article?

Haven't you seen my usertitle?

 

[JustOneWay]

Scribbler = ScMay ?

 

[ScMay]

Scribbler = ScMay ?

Nope, but by the looks of it we think very much alike!

As for the article, just because I'm bored right now I actually did read it and was not impressed. At no point did it provide evidence that there was vote rigging, merely light-weight criticism of alternative theories. It was also riddled with transparent persuasive techniques generally assuming the reader already agrees before the argument is put forward -

especially considering the fact that the New York Senator gained a crucial 7% swing thanks to provably vulnerable Diebold electronic voting machines.

This is worded to seem like it is a 'fact' that Hilary got a 7% swing from the voting machines when I suspect what they are really saying (and deliberately allowing themselves to be misread) is that it is a 'fact' that the machines were used and vulnerable and that she got a large swing towards her. Finally the whole article revolves around the assumed presence of a conspiracy of unfathomable proportions, consisting of innumerable news agencies as well as government agencies (both US & UN i suspect), without even trying to justify this assumption.

 

[JustOneWay]

Nope, but by the looks of it we think very much alike!

Sorry to hear about that

As for the article, just because I'm bored right now I actually did read it and was not impressed. At no point did it provide evidence that there was vote rigging, merely light-weight criticism of alternative theories. It was also riddled with transparent persuasive techniques generally assuming the reader already agrees before the argument is put forward - This is worded to seem like it is a 'fact' that Hilary got a 7% swing from the voting machines when I suspect what they are really saying (and deliberately allowing themselves to be misread) is that it is a 'fact' that the machines were used and vulnerable and that she got a large swing towards her. Finally the whole article revolves around the assumed presence of a conspiracy of unfathomable proportions, consisting of innumerable news agencies as well as government agencies (both US & UN i suspect), without even trying to justify this assumption.

Yes, no evidence.

 

[WayWord]

1-9-08: New England voting machine firm has executive criminal record
They program every single voting machine in New Hampshire, Connecticut, almost all of Massachusetts, Vermont, and Maine. But did state officials in five New England states ever do a criminal background check on this company's executives? Do the laws of these five states even ALLOW them to hire convicted criminals for services paid for by the state? What about over 500 local towns and municipalities?

According to my sources, LHS Marketing and Sales Director Ken Hajjar grew up with owner John Silvestro in Lawrence, Massachusetts. They both moved to Londonderry, New Hampshire, where Ken Hajjar was arrested, indicted, and pleaded guilty to "sale /CND" and sentenced to 12 months in the Rockingham County Correctional facility, and fined $2000. As things go for the politically connected, he was then given a deferred sentence and $1000 of his fine was suspended. .

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

 

[WayWord]

Kucinich Seeks NH Dem Vote Recount

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: January 10, 2008

Filed at 11:24 p.m. ET

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) -- Democrat Dennis Kucinich, who won less than 2 percent of the vote in the New Hampshire primary, said Thursday he wants a recount to ensure that all ballots in his party's contest were counted. The Ohio congressman cited ''serious and credible reports, allegations and rumors'' about the integrity of Tuesday results.

Deputy Secretary of State David Scanlan said Kucinich is entitled to a statewide recount. But, under New Hampshire law, Kucinich will have to pay for it. Scanlan said he had ''every confidence'' the results are accurate.

In a letter dated Thursday, Kucinich said he does not expect significant changes in his vote total, but wants assurance that ''100 percent of the voters had 100 percent of their votes counted.''

Kucinich alluded to online reports alleging disparities around the state between hand-counted ballots, which tended to favor Sen. Barack Obama, and machine-counted ones that tended to favor Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. He also noted the difference between pre-election polls, which indicated Obama would win, and Clinton's triumph by a 39 percent to 37 percent margin.

FULL ARTICLE - New York Times

 

[lastelement]

Diebold 2008

 

[Kyoon]

BECAUSE the TRUTH is NEVER TOO HORRIBLE, even if YOU, the sheep, realize it only once you are already INSIDE the slaughterhouse.

 

[tulc]

BECAUSE the TRUTH is NEVER TOO HORRIBLE, even if YOU, the sheep, realize it only once you are already INSIDE the slaughterhouse.

Hmmm still not going for the color, bold and CAPLOC huh? Oh well, I think you're missing out on making your posts more impressive.
tulc(and posting the same post in different threads would actually be considered SPAM by CF rules)

 

[Panzerkamfwagen]

BECAUSE the TRUTH is NEVER TOO HORRIBLE, even if YOU, the sheep, realize it only once you are already INSIDE the slaughterhouse.

Using all capital letters is the internet equivalent of shouting.

 

[Kyoon]

Despite the fact that I explained the script for the cheap illuminati theater "Comeback kid Clinton 'elected' the last president of the US" aka "BushClinton, the last antichrist", and "Clinton suspends campaign, endorses Obama" as the final chapter before the curtain falls (1), the sheep don't get a thing.

"Clinton suspends campaign, endorses Obama" theater explained
This is nothing but an act to sell better Clinton, using the mind control technique of acceptance by association.
To better sell the "victory" of 5 pct Clinton, she is previously (i.e. now) sold as the candidate who, despite having received "more votes" (2), was a "victim of the delegates system", and yet was such a "fair player" by calling her "crowd" to fully stand behind Obama.
So when next the curtain will fall, it will be easier to have the sheep cheering what they just watched on stage.
In other words: when after the coming "scandal" chapter "forcing" Obama to exit the "race", he will appeal to his crowd to "stand with all their forces behind Clinton against McCain".

As I explained previously, you, the sheep, are long past the point of still having any chance to understand any illuminati theater until you will be slaughtered. (3)
Because you accepted to carry the mark of the beast.

Notes
(1) All has been explained long ago:
last-antichrist.blogspot.com/2007/05/hillary-clinton-2008-for-dummies-two.html
end-times-data.blogspot.com/2008/02/loser-john-mccain-to-clinton-horrible.html
end-times-prophet.blogspot.com/2008/02/hours-before-hillary-clinton-will-be.html
end-times-computers.blogspot.com/2007/05/ronpaul2008com-barackobamacom.html

(2) This is how the illuminati media sells the ca. one million votes Clinton got in the primaries, as she "concedes": "About 18 million people voted for Clinton. It was the closest a woman has come to capturing a political party nomination for the presidency." (Associated Press - June 7)

(3) The HORRIBLE TRUTH about YOU, the sheep
mind-control-for-dummies.blogspot.com/2007/04/quintessential-mind-control-programming.html