Implicitly.
What methodology does he expect someone to use when he asks them to "prove" a proposition? Blind faith?
Persuasion? "If you don't believe it you'll go to theorist hell where the stupid burns forever!"

Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Implicitly.
What methodology does he expect someone to use when he asks them to "prove" a proposition? Blind faith?
Persuasion generally includes an appeal to reason.Persuasion? "If you don't believe it you'll go to theorist hell where the stupid burns forever!"
![]()
Persuasion generally includes an appeal to reason.
Trying to appeal to my self-interest (the appeal to hell) wouldn't be a logical argument. At best it might only frighten me into believing it. It wouldn't be rationally established that it was true.
My point is this, there are a variety of theologies that can from the bible and each one thinks they have it right. How would peer review help this, unless the ones doing the peer review, were all of the same theological ilk.
So I'm still waiting on someone to explain to me how traditional causes of belieffaith, revelation, dogma, authority, charisma, conventional wisdom, the invigorating glow of subjective certaintyeliminate, rather than generate, the errors I outlined in the original post and how they can lead us to knowledge as uncontaminated as possible.
Or they'll never get around to answering the question directly. Happens every time.That may take some time.
Or they'll never get around to answering the question directly. Happens every time.
Here's a fun little update to this thread. A test kitchen challenges conventional wisdom of thawing a steak before cooking it by splitting frozen steaks into control and experimental groups. Even in the area of food does it do us well to implement epistemologies that embody skeptical inquiry and ingenuous workarounds than simply doing things the way we've always done it unquestioningly because that's tradition.
If You Thaw Your Steaks Before Cooking, You're Doing It Wrong