You do realize they are also getting rid of the librarians at those schools, or do you? You know the people who help a student find what they are looking for, the ones who not only deliver a book but also deliver a book that the kid might actually enjoy reading. Having lots of books, but no way to find the one you want is enough to discourage most adults. It is also enough to keep a kid in a disadvantaged neighborhood from reading at all.
Yes, just like the aforementioned Cali and NY schools have done.
(and for the record, the e-learning systems and search capabilities in them can help a person find a book as well)
Just one point of reference:
60% of (the 1800) schools in NYC don't have a librarian, and 40% don't have a physical room on-prem that serves as a library (and has been replaced with e-book systems much like the one Houston has)
For California (per their own DOE site)
Only 9% of their schools have a librarian on staff, and 16% of their schools don't have a physical space designated as a library.
Despite those surprising numbers (when considering they're blue states), both NY and Cali rank in the top 3rd for public education systems.
The irony in this is, Texas actually has the highest number of school librarians as of 2019
And in terms of "librarian:student" ratios, Texas is actually doing way better than California, Illinois, and Oregon.
So California is woefully understaffed in terms of librarians, and 60% of NYC schools don't have a librarian (and 40% of their schools don't have a library)... you don't hear much about it. Texas (who already has ratios that superior to that of many blue states) is cutting 28 of their 4,000+ librarians, and it's front page news across a variety of news sites.