Cappadocious
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2012
- 3,885
- 860
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
In what sense, and where?accuse him of, but substitutionary atonement was one thing he taught
Upvote
0
In what sense, and where?accuse him of, but substitutionary atonement was one thing he taught
and I asked evidence for the modernism as you defined it. repeating there is an issue you see is not the same as showing evidence for the issue
Capp, you've been defending the use of the word. We have you on record for much of this thread as doing so. Are you seriously trying to claim now that you aren't defending it?Nah, I've got no personal attachment to it. That's your prerogative
Who would describe any word that way besides a neo-neo-platonist wannabe, talking about arete and the good the true and the beautiful off the cuff? Don't put that on me.
uhhhhh
You are missing a connecting premise. *why* does this have to do with legitimacy?
Dying! smh !!!
View attachment 200113
In what sense, and where?
I will come back to you when I get those passages on the mind in the heart vs. rationality etc etc and other Romantic idioms.
Or it would beeasier to critique our example here, Rus, but either way
That is a slightly different assertion from what Fr Thomas Hopko was making.
He's commenting on Πᾶν ἄρσεν διανοῖγον μήτραν in the footnote on 123 as implying the womb was opened, if that helps and your Greek is less rusty than mine, and which I presume is what people object to.
I mean, I'd like commentary on what Πᾶν ἄρσεν διανοῖγον μήτραν is supposed to mean, then.