• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Hey neo calvinist

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,056
56
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,940,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
That's a question of faith - something you or I may believe to be true. Whether or not anyone thinks they 'know' it is true beyond all possible doubt is neither here nor there, it either is or it isn't, we can believe it or not but our belief or lack of belief makes no difference to whether or not it is 'absolutely true'.
That’s not what I asked. I asked if it’s true for all people.
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,715
6,626
Massachusetts
✟645,727.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The internet is full of calvinist stuff. When you google a meaning of a verse you'll most likely landed on a calvinist site.
Well, I would say that here in Christian Forums you have not found mainly what Calvinists claim :)

And in my opinion there are different groups represented for different issues. So, in case you have only or mainly been finding Calvinist representations, may be this is because of your way of searching.

But it is possible that people can pay Google to favor their stuff. So, just in case certain ones claiming to be Calvinist have payed to promote their sites, you could need to use a different searching method, in order to bypass that.

Also, not all people claiming to be Calvinist might agree with each other about certain things. And people can misunderstand what they are saying.

But I think I have gotten more from the Bible, than from a lot of people who are mainly comparing their stuff with other people's stuff :)

If other groups which consist of millions of Christian came to a different conclusion, wouldn't it makes them think they might be wrong?
Well, even if Calvinists were to be wrong, this would not at all be because others don't agree with them! Jesus says many will be deceived and lead many astray. So, great numbers is not at all evidence that so-and-so must be right!
 
Upvote 0

Petros2015

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2016
5,205
4,426
53
undisclosed Bunker
✟318,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,201
7,539
North Carolina
✟345,296.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The internet is full of calvinist stuff. When you google a meaning of a verse you'll most likely landed on a calvinist site.
I'm not anti calvinist but when I debate with one they're super sure they're right. Then I asked them did they read anything outside of their eco chamber they can't answer. Not sure it's the same with any other group. In order to debate or discuss, at least your knowledge can't be just
limited to your own circle. Calvinist think they are the only group of the majority in the Christian world but the reality is they have an unique view of certain things.
If other groups which consist of millions of Christian came to a different conclusion, wouldn't it makes them think they might be wrong?
So understanding of Scripture is determined by popular vote?
 
Upvote 0

J3thekingofking

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2019
498
141
-
✟55,711.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Well, I would say that here in Christian Forums you have not found mainly what Calvinists claim :)

And in my opinion there are different groups represented for different issues. So, in case you have only or mainly been finding Calvinist representations, may be this is because of your way of searching.

But it is possible that people can pay Google to favor their stuff. So, just in case certain ones claiming to be Calvinist have payed to promote their sites, you could need to use a different searching method, in order to bypass that.

Also, not all people claiming to be Calvinist might agree with each other about certain things. And people can misunderstand what they are saying.

But I think I have gotten more from the Bible, than from a lot of people who are mainly comparing their stuff with other people's stuff :)

Well, even if Calvinists were to be wrong, this would not at all be because others don't agree with them! Jesus says many will be deceived and lead many astray. So, great numbers is not at all evidence that so-and-so must be right!
But many become calvinist because some celebrities pastor on youtube
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Well, I would say that here in Christian Forums you have not found mainly what Calvinists claim :)

And in my opinion there are different groups represented for different issues. So, in case you have only or mainly been finding Calvinist representations, may be this is because of your way of searching.

But it is possible that people can pay Google to favor their stuff. So, just in case certain ones claiming to be Calvinist have payed to promote their sites, you could need to use a different searching method, in order to bypass that.

Also, not all people claiming to be Calvinist might agree with each other about certain things. And people can misunderstand what they are saying.

But I think I have gotten more from the Bible, than from a lot of people who are mainly comparing their stuff with other people's stuff :)

Well, even if Calvinists were to be wrong, this would not at all be because others don't agree with them! Jesus says many will be deceived and lead many astray. So, great numbers is not at all evidence that so-and-so must be right!
Much of what is argued in the name of Calvinism is putting words into Calvin's mouth that were never there. I should know. I have read his commentaries on most of the New Testament books, and am currently working through Isaiah with Ezekiel to follow. The fact is, I haven't found half of what has been argued on these forums actually written in the commentaries. I guess the neo-Calvinists don't want to be confused with the facts.
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
You're not ready for a debate when you are a Christian with 1 Yr exp and have attended a calvinist for a year. If you don't know something just say don't know.
I have had over 50 years experience in the faith, and have spent the last three years reading Calvin's commentaries, plus his Institutes, and I would say that much of what has been said against Calvin is just verbal garbage.
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Calvin was a lawyer, and that legal training had a profound effect on his interpretation of the scriptures. When anyone tries to nail down a kind of holistic approach to bible interpretation like that, and claims to have got it right, by definition you can be sure they are wrong. The bible is way more complex than some set of legalistic notions about it, but we’re all different and some people find that kind of approach appealing. It offers a kind of clarity that, while entirely false, has a particular appeal.
Charles Grandison Finney was also a lawyer and his theology is somewhere between Calvinist and Arminian, and writes in legalised prose. One needs a dictionary and spiritual knife and fork to make sense of what he is saying. I have an MA in English Literature and still find his theological writing hard going. Calvin, on the other hand is clear, concise, and very easy to understand. This is because he wrote not for theologians, but for ordinary church members. Interestingly enough, both men have been responsible for multitudes turning to Christ through their writing and preaching. Over 80% of Finney's converts became long-term, stable church members. Calvin's writing has resulted in the main revivals of Christianity right through to the Welsh Revival. The great awakenings of the 18th Century in New England were the direct result of Calvin's teaching through Jonathan Edwards. Whether we agree with their theology or not, the results speak for themselves.
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Please, show your evidence.
I think he is referring to John MacArthur and Paul Washer. Actually I have found both men to be excellent Bible teachers. Paul Washer seems to be the more passionate of the two.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,056
56
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,940,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
I think he is referring to John MacArthur and Paul Washer. Actually I have found both men to be excellent Bible teachers. Paul Washer seems to be the more passionate of the two.
If Paul Washer can convince someone to become a Calvinist, then Wow! ^_^
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
If Paul Washer can convince someone to become a Calvinist, then Wow! ^_^
He's put me off getting anyone to pray the sinner's prayer as part of receiving Christ, after he said that more people have ended up in hell through that prayer than anything else!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hammster
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Site Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,468
Tarnaveni
✟841,659.00
Country
Romania
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Charles Grandison Finney was also a lawyer and his theology is somewhere between Calvinist and Arminian, and writes in legalised prose. One needs a dictionary and spiritual knife and fork to make sense of what he is saying. I have an MA in English Literature and still find his theological writing hard going. Calvin, on the other hand is clear, concise, and very easy to understand. This is because he wrote not for theologians, but for ordinary church members. Interestingly enough, both men have been responsible for multitudes turning to Christ through their writing and preaching. Over 80% of Finney's converts became long-term, stable church members. Calvin's writing has resulted in the main revivals of Christianity right through to the Welsh Revival. The great awakenings of the 18th Century in New England were the direct result of Calvin's teaching through Jonathan Edwards. Whether we agree with their theology or not, the results speak for themselves.

The results speak to the tendency people have to enjoy being told what to think.
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
The results speak to the tendency people have to enjoy being told what to think.
That's a bit obscure for me. Actually, a think is not a thought until you've thunk it.
 
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Site Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,468
Tarnaveni
✟841,659.00
Country
Romania
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's a bit obscure for me. Actually, a think is not a thought until you've thunk it.

Sure, but not all of our thinking, or not much (or any) of it, arises in a vacuum. Prescriptive religious systems give people a package deal, something they learn, not a way into understanding and a personal faith in what that system provides a gloss for.
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Sure, but not all of our thinking, or not much (or any) of it, arises in a vacuum. Prescriptive religious systems give people a package deal, something they learn, not a way into understanding and a personal faith in what that system provides a gloss for.
I think in the novice states one has to learn many things by rote from faithful mentors. But by maturity and experience one comes to the point where they are able to discern for themselves what is appropriate or not. The Scripture for that is:
"But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil" (Hebrews 5:14).
 
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Site Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,468
Tarnaveni
✟841,659.00
Country
Romania
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's a bit obscure for me. Actually, a think is not a thought until you've thunk it.

It’s like the difference between Abraham’s faith and that of those among the Pharisees Jesus took issue with, the especially legalistic. The latter were convinced of their rightness, having nailed it all down to a logical set of principles that could be explained as being in concordance with the law. It infuriated Christ. Abraham, on the other hand, had nothing more than a single promise and space to develop a faith, and a sense of good judgment, through a long process of trail and error, a kind of conversation with life. Out of that came something genuine, whereas the religion of the legalists is unhealthy and brittle.
 
Upvote 0