Karl - Liberal Backslider
Senior Veteran
- Jul 16, 2003
- 4,157
- 297
- 57
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- UK-Labour
Nope. I bet none of it did. Details always get altered as oral traditions are passed down.YahwehLove said:
Herev.
I just wonder something.
Did anything that is in the bible actually have to happen the way its recorded?
Sudden jump there from "historically accurate" to "true". I refer you to my post here: http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=10689573&postcount=4How do you know any of it is true?
Or oral traditions that record events in a variety of ways, with a variable level of historical accuracy. What does it matter? The gospel writers can't agree what the witnesses to the Resurrection found in the tomb. Obviously that Jesus wasn't there was more important than who or what was.maybe the whole thing is fable and allegory.
Upvote
0