"God incarnated to save His entire creation."
^^^That's universalism. Period.
I expect an immediate retraction from you; here's my whole post, with emphasis and proof that you failed to read my entire post in proper context:
In orthodox theology, nothing is destroyed. God incarnated to save His entire creation. All existence will be resurrected and transfigured.
As for people, all of us will have everlasting life, although some of us will find it a terrible experience.
The idea of heaven upon the Second Advent as being somewhere else like it is now is popular theology. Heaven will be HERE; the Church is a foreshadowment and a sliver of God's Kingdom here as it is, but when His celestial realm unites with our material plane, it will be an event beyond human imagining.
As for hell, that too will finally come about. It, however, will be HERE as well. Hell is a real place in the future, and that place is here. Those who reject God's sacrificial love and grace will not be forced to accept it. God will Judge those who don't want it accordingly. However, God will not leave His returned Presence HERE. Those who will experience hell will find that Presence, now everlasting and them unable to find joy in our next Eden to be PAINFUL. They will gnash their teeth and wail, but the sounds of the joyous will drown them out.
A place of physical pain has
nothing on the pain that I describe above. God is a God of Life, not death. There is no more destruction. God won't harm a hair of the damned. He will allow them what they want: to be separate from Him, yet at the same time, His actual Presence will be all around them.
That isn't a contradiction if you consider the fact that the Holy Spirit is always Present. Plenty of people here who live don't live according to the grace and love gifted by Him. As we can see, no contradictions at all.
No one populates hell now because hell doesn't exist yet. There is a holding place for fallen angels, but that was only for angels. They too will be released and Judged.
In the end, there will be only one realm: a union of our material plane with God's celestial realm. That's it.
How we experience that will determine if we are experiencing heaven or hell.
An immediate, honest retraction please. I do believe in hell, I believe it to be everlasting, and I believe it will be experienced by people.
"No one populates hell now because hell doesn't exist yet"
Luke 16.
Sheol isn't hell. Never has been and never will be. Sheol is a place of waiting and is a FORETASTE of the experience of heaven and hell, but is not those places.
"In orthodox theology, nothing is destroyed"
Lies....
Matthew 10:28
Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.
Can, not will.
...and I'm not talking about annihilationism. I'm talking about burning in hell for eternity.
Figurative language. Your theology is based on medieval popular theology that you can find in Dante's
Divine Comedy. Real orthodox theology isn't found there. It makes a smashing book (and would make a fantastic movie), but it makes poor theology.
At this point, you need to provide scripture to prove your point, because it's my opinion you're spouting personal beliefs based on what men have taught you:
I know how to read the Scriptures in the context that they have. All you give are literalist interpretations without considering a shred of schema.
Isaiah 29:13
The Lord says: These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is based on merely human rules they have been taught.
Follow your own advice.
There is no fire and brimstone hell. That's a medieval mishmash of the immediate afterlife theology of 1st century Judaism and of the Early Church (see the Apostle's Creed) combined with New Testament apocrypha and poor education (even among the clergy in the West; note you
don't see this nonsense in the East...hint hint: Byzantium and Civilization!).
In any event, I proved that I do believe in hell, that it is everlasting, and that it will be populated. Universalism rejects that. Therefore, I cannot be a Universalist. Please retract your utterly false accusation, thank you.