Still, a cessationist would say anytime someone is given what appears to be a spiritual gift described right there in the Bible and it actually edifies someone or the church, that it’s atill not of God. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can’t say God determines all things which come to pass and then turn around and say something is not of God. I’m sorry, but it’s a blatant contradiction. Most Calvinists do hold to compatibilism, but Zachariades has been clear that he’s a direct determinist. (See his arguments against James White and compabilism back in late 2017). In his view, God directly controls everything. So for him to debate cessationism is rediculous, in my opinion. He affirmed that man has absolutely no free will and neither does the devil. So all of the true manifestations of the spiritual gifts, the counterfeit ones, and fake one are all brought about by God because he’s decreed it. Therefore, to say something isn’t of God is a contradiction. If a cessationist affirms that the devil and humans can cause fakes and counterfeit outside of God’s will to be “not of God,” they’ve affirmed a belief in the devil and man being capable of acting autonomously from God’s will. Again, you can’t have your cake and eat it too and claim others who see this contradiction clearly don’t know what they are talking about. There’s a reason Dr. Zachariades wouldn’t answer my question. It’s because he knew that the follow-up question would be. And he wouldn’t dare go there.