The Muslims don't need to be in majority to take over. They will take whether the host likes it or not. Just look at Israel.
Oh yes, Israel, that well-known Islamic state.
You were already wrong the moment you brought the Jews. You being a liberal and has uttered this nonsense of lumping the Jews and Muslims together; and the Jews living in the US are majority a liberal; what a strange bedfellow.
I said "prove me wrong", not "post a diatribe of little substance". Now, again,
prove the following statement wrong;
They are both religious groups. Both have bad members and good members. Both have had their members do bad things and good things.
In this respect, how are Jews any different from Muslims?
Well...that's because it's the LIBERALS who are the ones who do the majority of the world's killings, especially if they become Head-of-States. Example: (also including US presidents putting US in a war): Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler (yes, Hitler), Roosevelt (WW2), Woodrow Wilson (WW1), Truman (Korea), Kennedy (Vietnam), Clinton (Kosovo), etc.
Non Head-of-States: abortionists and their sympathizers, etc.
I'd look up the word "liberal" in a good dictionary if I were you. Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pol and Mao were authoritarian communists, which is pretty much the exact opposite of a liberal. Hitler as well. You really think Hitler's persecution of the gypsies, Jews, homosexuals, and handicapped was
liberal behaviour? The mind boggles! Like I said, it's easy to blame everything on "liberals" when you define them as "anyone who does bad things".
And I don't know enough about US history to talk with authority about Korea and Vietnam, but any President would have declared war on Japan after a pre-emptive strike on the Pacific Fleet, Kosovo was in order to stop genocide, and was a just war if there ever was one, and it was conservative presidents who brought the US into Iraq (both times), and Afghanistan. Also look up the Grenada conflict, and US involvement in central American affairs. Getting into wars is not the sole preserve of either liberals or conservatives (and even those who pass for liberals in the US aren't particularly liberal by international standards)
