Hannity's Enemy of the Week

[blueapplepaste]

Aid and comfort to the enemy. Remember that? It's quite clear

So disagreement is now equal to aid and comfort to the enemy? So with regards to Iraq that would make about 70% of the country traitors. Wow, there are a lot of traitors in America.

 

[MachZer0]

I don't know. But Dana Carvey said it every week, and that's good enough for me.

Now things are starting to make sense

 

[MachZer0]

So disagreement is now equal to aid and comfort to the enemy? So with regards to Iraq that would make about 70% of the country traitors. Wow, there are a lot of traitors in America.

When you visit the country with which we are at war, call our soldiers criminals and make broadcasts to our soldiers in favor of the enemy, yes, that is aid and comfort to the enemy.

 

[Vylo]

When you visit the country with which we are at war, call our soldiers criminals and make broadcasts to our soldiers in favor of the enemy, yes, that is aid and comfort to the enemy.

Can you cite where Kerry did this?

 

[chalice_thunder]

I disagree: I think the real enemy is political authoritarianism that seeks to impose a dictatorship, as well as religious fundamentalism that seeks to impose its will upon society as a theocracy.

BINGO!

Don't plan on seeing it on Hannity though.

He's a tool for the Orwellian administration.

 

[christalee4]

That would be a problem. I'm glad we're not dealing with that problem now

But we are dealing with that problem, both externally and internally. Muslim theocrats and radicals want to impose their brand of Islam on other more secular Muslim countries. And the current administration, as well as influential religious conservative zealot organizations in this country who helped to elect Bush also seek to impose their brand of authoritarian power (under the guise of "providing security" and "taking America back for Christians") over this country. Both are also engaged in a struggle to gain congtrol of oil. It's essentially the same agenda, but with a different flavor.

 

[MachZer0]

Can you cite where Kerry did this?

I'm not talking about Kerry, in case you missed it.

 

[MachZer0]

But we are dealing with that problem, both externally and internally. Muslim theocrats and radicals want to impose their brand of Islam on other more secular Muslim countries. And the current administration, as well as influential religious conservative zealot organizations in this country who helped to elect Bush also seek to impose their brand of authoritarian power (under the guise of "providing security" and "taking America back for Christians") over this country. Both are also engaged in a struggle to gain congtrol of oil. It's essentially the same agenda, but with a different flavor.

Can you give examples of how we are threatened by a dictatorship, as you claimed? Also, can you give examples of how we are threatened by a theocracy, as you claimed?

 

[Vylo]

I'm not talking about Kerry, in case you missed it.

I did, considering your statement was in response to comments about Iraq. I'll assume you are talking about Fonda then?

 

[USincognito]

All the while accusing those handful of radicals who dared to express themselves at this weekend's War protest. Now I didn't agree with us going into Iraq, but I agree with Colin Powell: we broke it, we need to fix it. And I think a lot of the rhetoric coming from those who have participated in anti-Iraq War rallies, from Mar. 2003 until today are radicals stuck in 1973, but driving home from work today I listened until I feared I would vomit to Mike Gallagher doing his talking point best to trash those Americans who dared exercise their right of free speech and assembly.

He's ad hom attacks on the hollywood types were merely aggrevating, but his repeated lies about how anyone daring to speak out against the Iraq War was spitting on the troops - he said spitting on the troops at least 5 times in the 20 minutes I listened is nothing more than an old Urban legend that's been debunked other than 30 year ex post facto anecdotes.

Just keep lying Mike Gallagher, I almost want to support your nearly racist response to the Mexican illegal invasion we're dealing with in Texas, but as long as you spread Bull pucky like Jane Fonda spitting on returning soldiers, a proven lie, I can't join with you in wanting Farmer's Branch to require proof of citizenship before renting an apartment.

 

[christalee4]

Can you give examples of how we are threatened by a dictatorship, as you claimed? Also, can you give examples of how we are threatened by a theocracy, as you claimed?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/26/AR2005112600857.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10965509/site/newsweek

http://nydailynews.com/front/story/485561p-408789c.html

http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=eed74d9d44c30493706fe03f4c9b3a77

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Establishing_martial_law_in_the_United_States

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0420,perlstein,53582,1.html

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines01/1224-02.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/12/AR2005051201740.html

http://www.abpnews.com/1567.article

http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v08n1/chrisre1.html

http://www.harpers.org/JesusPlusNothing.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121170&page=1
http://www.theocracywatch.org/govern.htm

http://www.serve.com/thibodep/cr/worldcnq.htm

Is that enough? I have a lot more, if you need. Just do me a favor and read all of it first before you jump down my throat and tell me that my source links are all biased.

 

[MachZer0]

All the while accusing those handful of radicals who dared to express themselves at this weekend's War protest. Now I didn't agree with us going into Iraq, but I agree with Colin Powell: we broke it, we need to fix it. And I think a lot of the rhetoric coming from those who have participated in anti-Iraq War rallies, from Mar. 2003 until today are radicals stuck in 1973, but driving home from work today I listened until I feared I would vomit to Mike Gallagher doing his talking point best to trash those Americans who dared exercise their right of free speech and assembly.

Aren't you now trashing Gallagher for exercising his right to free speech?

Just keep lying Mike Gallagher, I almost want to support your nearly racist response to the Mexican illegal invasion we're dealing with in Texas,

What lie did he tell, specifically, since I didn't hear the program?

but as long as you spread Bull pucky like Jane Fonda spitting on returning soldiers, a proven lie, I can't join with you in wanting Farmer's Branch to require proof of citizenship before renting an apartment.

Did he actually say that Fonda spit on the troops, and by spit I mean literally.

 

[MachZer0]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/26/AR2005112600857.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10965509/site/newsweek

http://nydailynews.com/front/story/485561p-408789c.html

http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=eed74d9d44c30493706fe03f4c9b3a77

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Establishing_martial_law_in_the_United_States

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0420,perlstein,53582,1.html

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines01/1224-02.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/12/AR2005051201740.html

http://www.abpnews.com/1567.article

http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v08n1/chrisre1.html

http://www.harpers.org/JesusPlusNothing.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121170&page=1
http://www.theocracywatch.org/govern.htm

http://www.serve.com/thibodep/cr/worldcnq.htm

Is that enough? I have a lot more, if you need. Just do me a favor and read all of it first before you jump down my throat and tell me that my source links are all biased.

After reading your first link and realizing it has nothing to do with either dictatorship or theocracy, there isn't much point of wasting my time reading the others. Suffice it to say that when things happen that you do not like, you have exaggerated their impact

 

[JustOneWay]

Aren't you now trashing Gallagher for exercising his right to free speech?

Now you are questioning USincognito's right to free speech. What a vicious circle this is

 

[MachZer0]

Now you are questioning USincognito's right to free speech. What a vicious circle this is

Just pointing out that infamous double standard once again.

 

[christalee4]

After reading your first link and realizing it has nothing to do with either dictatorship or theocracy, there isn't much point of wasting my time reading the others. Suffice it to say that when things happen that you do not like, you have exaggerated their impact

You asked me to provide information on two very large questions, and therefore I had to honor that request with the appropriate response. Now you're not even going to read through the rest of my links to form an opinion?

It's not simply a matter of "not liking" certain events; it's a matter of lack of oversight and power gone way out of control that may affect all of our lives, including many Christians who do not toe the hard right line.

I have not written this information, so I could not have "exagerrated" anything. Why not open your mind and read through the information, so you can decide for yourself. Or, as another very conservative religious poster in another thread complained, are you refusing to read the material because it might "poison" your mind against your faith?

 

[JoshuaW]

When you visit the country with which we are at war, call our soldiers criminals and make broadcasts to our soldiers in favor of the enemy, yes, that is aid and comfort to the enemy.

Simply amazing how you focus your outrage on something Jane Fonda did forty years ago yet support the administration that allows our soldiers to die on a daily basis simply because it does not with to admit a mistake.

 

[chalice_thunder]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/26/AR2005112600857.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10965509/site/newsweek

http://nydailynews.com/front/story/485561p-408789c.html

http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=eed74d9d44c30493706fe03f4c9b3a77

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Establishing_martial_law_in_the_United_States

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0420,perlstein,53582,1.html

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines01/1224-02.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/12/AR2005051201740.html

http://www.abpnews.com/1567.article

http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v08n1/chrisre1.html

http://www.harpers.org/JesusPlusNothing.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121170&page=1
http://www.theocracywatch.org/govern.htm

http://www.serve.com/thibodep/cr/worldcnq.htm

Is that enough? I have a lot more, if you need. Just do me a favor and read all of it first before you jump down my throat and tell me that my source links are all biased.

I wish I could rep you again!

 

[Guttermouth]

A traitor is defined as someone who betrays a trust, a cause or their country. And it most often references a person who has committed treason. It also commonly refers to someone who does so purposefully, but not necessarily so. So, the only question in my mind is, did the Bush administration purposefully commit treason, or was it by accident. There is no doubt they have betrayed our trust by lying, performing illegal acts and conducting themselves in a manner unbefitting our American ideals. And they have betrayed our cause (battling terrorism) by conducting an illegal war that is aiding and fomenting terrorism. Whether they thought they were benefiting the country or knew they were harming it is the only open question. Their acts have clearly undermined our military and caused the death or maiming of tens of thousands of American citizens. If only we could draft the lot of them and send them to Fallujah.

 

[JustOneWay]

A traitor is defined as someone who betrays a trust, a cause or their country. And it most often references a person who has committed treason. It also commonly refers to someone who does so purposefully, but not necessarily so. So, the only question in my mind is, did the Bush administration purposefully commit treason, or was it by accident. There is no doubt they have betrayed our trust by lying, performing illegal acts and conducting themselves in a manner unbefitting our American ideals. And they have betrayed our cause (battling terrorism) by conducting an illegal war that is aiding and fomenting terrorism. Whether they thought they were benefiting the country or knew they were harming it is the only open question. Their acts have clearly undermined our military and caused the death or maiming of tens of thousands of American citizens. If only we could draft the lot of them and send them to Fallujah.

But it is SO much easier to blame the actors and musicians!!!! Remember that Hollywood is filled with commies!!!