Great Unconformity

[JohnEmmett]

there is no sign or reason to believe in past civilizations.

A Vedic alternative to Darwin’s theory with Michael Cremo

 

[Subduction Zone]

typical atheist logic

You mean "logic". There is no reason that you cannot think logically too. Atheists do not have the exclusive rights to logic.

 

[Subduction Zone]

A Vedic alternative to Darwin’s theory with Michael Cremo

Posting comedy does not help you.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Posting comedy does not help you.

such comments do not help you

 

[Subduction Zone]

such comments do not help you

When you refute yourself as you just I do not need any help..

 

[JohnEmmett]

I do not need any help …

perhaps listen to the video

 

[Subduction Zone]

perhaps listen to the video

Perhaps you should study epistemology.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Perhaps you should study epistemology.

I know the fate of atheists


they will lose the human state

 

[Subduction Zone]

I know the fate of atheists


they will lose the human state

I sincerely doubt if you know that. That appears to be only a mere belief. Believing real hard is not knowing.

 

[JohnEmmett]

I sincerely doubt if you know that.

I know you sincerely doubt

 

[Subduction Zone]

I know you sincerely doubt

Unfortunately you do not appear to know the difference between knowing and believing.

I know that they have found strata that you thought were missing. I can show you where they exist. I can show you the fossils found in them. I can tell you quite a bit about them since the work was published for all to see. You seem to only want the information to be missing for some odd reason. But when you cannot support your beliefs it only demonstrates that belief is all that you have.

Knowledge is demonstrable. If you can't show it, you don't know it.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Knowledge is demonstrable. If you can't show it, you don't know it.

certainly the afterlife will be the evidence

 

[Subduction Zone]

certainly the afterlife will be the evidence

You just admitted to only having a belief. I could make the same sort of claim that when you are dead you are dead. Neither claim is supported by evidence so they are both equally worthless.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Neither claim is supported by evidence so they are both equally worthless.

you will find out…

 

[Subduction Zone]

you will find out…

You won't find out.

 

[JohnEmmett]

You just admitted to only having a belief.

Buddhist teaching or belief

 

[Subduction Zone]

Buddhist teaching or belief

And you also only "believe" when it comes to the great conformity. Some of your beliefs are demonstrably wrong.

You might want to learn what evidence is. Scientific evidence is well defined. People that deny that evidence are simply wrong.

 

[JohnEmmett]

And you also only "believe" when it comes to the great conformity.

I theorize (about a reset)


Revelation 21
Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth”

 

[Subduction Zone]

I theorize (about a reset)


Revelation 21
Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth”

No. If you theorized about it you would have a reasonable test that could refute your beliefs. In the sciences the word "theory" does not mean "speculate". Until you have a reasonable test that could possibly refute your beliefs you only have speculation, and as result no scientific evidence at all.

You will see me ask creationists and Flat Earthers what test could show their idea to be wrong. Once they do that they have admitted that their idea is speculation only and not based upon the sciences.

 

[JohnEmmett]

If you theorized about it you would have a reasonable test that could refute your beliefs.

I expect it will happen again


we are running out of resources … hence it is necessary