- Jan 21, 2017
- 5,192
- 484
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Buddhist
- Marital Status
- Celibate
there is no sign or reason to believe in past civilizations.
A Vedic alternative to Darwin’s theory with Michael Cremo
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
there is no sign or reason to believe in past civilizations.
You mean "logic". There is no reason that you cannot think logically too. Atheists do not have the exclusive rights to logic.
typical atheist logic
Posting comedy does not help you.
A Vedic alternative to Darwin’s theory with Michael Cremo
Posting comedy does not help you.
When you refute yourself as you just I do not need any help..
such comments do not help you
I do not need any help …
Perhaps you should study epistemology.
perhaps listen to the video
Perhaps you should study epistemology.
I sincerely doubt if you know that. That appears to be only a mere belief. Believing real hard is not knowing.
I know the fate of atheists
they will lose the human state
I sincerely doubt if you know that.
Unfortunately you do not appear to know the difference between knowing and believing.
I know you sincerely doubt
Knowledge is demonstrable. If you can't show it, you don't know it.
You just admitted to only having a belief. I could make the same sort of claim that when you are dead you are dead. Neither claim is supported by evidence so they are both equally worthless.
certainly the afterlife will be the evidence
Neither claim is supported by evidence so they are both equally worthless.
You just admitted to only having a belief.
And you also only "believe" when it comes to the great conformity. Some of your beliefs are demonstrably wrong.
Buddhist teaching or belief
And you also only "believe" when it comes to the great conformity.
No. If you theorized about it you would have a reasonable test that could refute your beliefs. In the sciences the word "theory" does not mean "speculate". Until you have a reasonable test that could possibly refute your beliefs you only have speculation, and as result no scientific evidence at all.
I theorize (about a reset)
Revelation 21
Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth”
If you theorized about it you would have a reasonable test that could refute your beliefs.