This fund has far reaching effects beyond just funding.
Other than making some yahoos feel good about themselves, what kind of far reaching effects are there?
I'm really enjoying watching the posts which ignore this text while lashing out at the fundraiser.
Other than making some yahoos feel good about themselves, what kind of far reaching effects are there?
I would like to know that as well.
Thank you for your service, HOWEVER as someone who lives in the rural south and thus is heavily red I do not feel that many Republicans hate the poor whether they want secture borders As to other issues such as food stamps we want to help people but not enable them. In other words, it is fine if you need help for a short while or are disabled. It is another thing to depend on others and not try for months and months or years and years. The fact is we cannot support everyone. Particularly, those who cannot pull their own weight. For the record, I am disabled, but I still understand we cannot support everyone.Speaking as a veteran social justice and political activist, I love giving to charities that help people who are poor and who are being marginalized and demonized by Republicans. I feel like anything I can do to thwart their agenda and keep them from succeeding with the wall is a good thing.
If the wall had been successfully built 80 or 100 years ago,Speaking as a veteran social justice and political activist, I love giving to charities that help people who are poor and who are being marginalized and demonized by Republicans. I feel like anything I can do to thwart their agenda and keep them from succeeding with the wall is a good thing.
IF their own leader told them under penalty of death not to seek to cross the border, and enforced it, no wall would be needed.
There are people around the globe talking about this right now.
Also as I previously stated, this has put the Dems directly set against the citizens rather that Trump or his administration.
When Cuck stated the wall is never going to happen for any reason he just blew his own flowery speech right out of the water. He has no intention of ever letting Trump build the wall even if the people want it, are willing to pay for it or find funding.
Most people do not realize that for over 100 years congress has had the potential to 'fix' things better for the poor, and instead has overall made things worse,Thank you for your service, HOWEVER as someone who lives in the rural south and thus is heavily red I do not feel that many Republicans hate the poor whether they want secture borders As to other issues such as food stamps we want to help people but not enable them. In other words, it is fine if you need help for a short while or are disabled. It is another thing to depend on others and not try for months and months or years and years. The fact is we cannot support everyone. Particularly, those who cannot pull their own weight. For the record, I am disabled, but I still understand we cannot support everyone.
That is true, as I posted: "...if they enforced it..." ...That's not true. If so their would be no murder for fear of facing execution. There are always those who think they can beat the system.
IF their own leader told them under penalty of death not to seek to cross the border, and enforced it, no wall would be needed.
If the wall had been successfully built 80 or 100 years ago,
there would be
a lot fewer poor (every year since , today, and future) in the United States (probably),
and a lot fewer idolators (for sure!).
The Cato piece made that same point.
Nobody said to just pretend they’re not a cost. But nearly every person is a net drain on society as a kid. If you’re going to account for the costs of these kids (who are us citizens), then you should also account for the benefits they bring when they get older. They’re contributions as adults are still a result of their parents having immigrated illegally.
By that sort of accounting, how can you possibly justify the cost of school and health care for any of them?
Thank you for your service, HOWEVER as someone who lives in the rural south and thus is heavily red I do not feel that many Republicans hate the poor whether they want secture borders As to other issues such as food stamps we want to help people but not enable them. In other words, it is fine if you need help for a short while or are disabled. It is another thing to depend on others and not try for months and months or years and years. The fact is we cannot support everyone. Particularly, those who cannot pull their own weight. For the record, I am disabled, but I still understand we cannot support everyone.
It's great knowing all this money that's been donated (millions upon millions of dollars) could have gone to help starving children, homeless and disabled veterans, battered women's shelters or any number of other organizations and charities set up to actually help people but instead, it's being spent on the prospect, only the hope that it will be used to build a giant wall in the desert to keep people out of the land of opportunity.
Oh but, ain't that America!
IF their own leader told them under penalty of death not to seek to cross the border, and enforced it, no wall would be needed.
If the wall had been successfully built 80 or 100 years ago,
there would be
a lot fewer poor (every year since , today, and future) in the United States (probably),
and a lot fewer idolators (for sure!).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?