deu58
Senior Veteran
Hi Bright Candle
Apparently you missed the part in the book of Acts that explains Paul caused an uproar in the Jewish community,
Ac 21:30 And all the city was moved, and the people ran together: and they took Paul, and drew him out of the temple: and forthwith the doors were shut.
Ac 21:31 And as they went about to kill him, tidings came unto the chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar.
Well, for one How could he violate a law that was no longer in effect?
Paul would not have gone out and bought a ham sandwich, But he did not chastise the Gentiles for what they ate,
In Acts Paul shaved his head and took a vow, But we see him teaching no such practice to the gentiles,
Now why would Paul do one thing and teach another?????
1co 6:12 All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.
Because he truly understood what happened at the cross, Thus he never taught us to worship on any specific day,
1co 9:19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.
1co 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;
1co 9:21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
yours in Christ
deu58
BrightCandle said:If Paul had taught that the Sabbath was changed to Sunday, can you imagine the uproar he would have created in the Jewish community? The evidence is that he didn't, because there is no record of the Jews accusing him of it, in fact in his defense, Paul said in Acts 23 that he "Neither against the law of the Jews, nor against the temple, nor against Caesar have I committed any offense." How could Paul had said this, if he believed and kept Sunday as the Sabbath?
Apparently you missed the part in the book of Acts that explains Paul caused an uproar in the Jewish community,
Ac 21:30 And all the city was moved, and the people ran together: and they took Paul, and drew him out of the temple: and forthwith the doors were shut.
Ac 21:31 And as they went about to kill him, tidings came unto the chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar.
Well, for one How could he violate a law that was no longer in effect?
Paul would not have gone out and bought a ham sandwich, But he did not chastise the Gentiles for what they ate,
In Acts Paul shaved his head and took a vow, But we see him teaching no such practice to the gentiles,
Now why would Paul do one thing and teach another?????
1co 6:12 All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.
Because he truly understood what happened at the cross, Thus he never taught us to worship on any specific day,
1co 9:19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.
1co 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;
1co 9:21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
yours in Christ
deu58
Upvote
0