- Dec 17, 2010
- 9,488
- 2,304
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
The 7 day cycle sets up the expectation of God's command later.We can begin with the first assumption: "I have moved away from any idea of a young earth. This is because of scientific reasons, not geology, but astronomy. Unless current astronomic theory is fatally flawed in multiple areas (which has been known to happen in science, but that’s not really a basis for dissenting, it’s a bit too sceptical in the bad sense) then it would seem that we receive information here on earth about events that occurred a long, long, long, long time ago (about things far, far, far, far away). So, the universe is old. (But again, if that’s wrong and science returns to an 8 000 year old cosmos, I don’t think that will somehow ‘vindicate the Bible’. If people won’t accept the apostles’ testimony about Jesus’ resurrection from the dead I doubt a young cosmos, or finding Noah’s Ark, will suddenly create faith)."
Assumes an old earth but ignores the fact that everything God created was made fully developed. The man & woman were created with the ability to understand and commune with God, and already prepared to procreate life. The trees in the garden also were fully developed with the ability to provide food for mankind. The whales God calls "great whales", meaning older. The fowls of the air already with the ability to fly above the earth. However, the Bible is silent as to how aged God made creation appear at the beginning when all things were created? We don't know, but we believe God when He tells us that everything in heaven and earth was created in six literal days just as His Word says He did.
And you fail to explain how if the days were not literal, we are to understand the seventh day when God said man must rest from his labor on that day.
But notice something? The cycle breaks.
What cycle? "Morning and evening."
Technically we're still IN the seventh day - we're meant to be enjoying the rest of Eden. But that's only if you pay attention to the literary genre of Genesis itself and stop bashing it with MODERN SCIENTIFIC questions. Ironically, the YEC approach robs Genesis 1 of meaning. It reduces it to a boring shopping list of what God made when, and... to be honest... I could care less? I mean, so what? This got made then, and this then. Why not just make it all in the one nano-second! BAM! WHY take 7 days to do it if you're the infinitely powerful and wise creator? Why spell out what happened what day?
Personally I think that approach to the text is faulty, and has warped our understanding of it by worrying about what Darwin said more than listening to the text live and breathe in the ancient language.
Upvote
0