God's Interpretation

[Hammster]

"As the sand of the sea," in Genesis 22:17 & Genesis 32:12 has been estimated to represent one quintillion grains of sand.

I thought you were going to use the KJV to prove the KJV.

 

[Hammster]

The Word of God is built on these doublet of days found in the KJV Bible. In fact, the demonstration Paul gives us in 2 Peter 3:3-8, is his representation of this doublet of days; it ends on the fourth day, with his instruction for us of the twenty-first Century.

I've no idea what you are talking about. I don't see the 21st century mentioned anywhere in the passage.

 

[Kenneth Redden]

I need a count to verify that statement.....please get back to me when you are finished.....

I got that from the Science channel. Go ask them.

 

[Kenneth Redden]

I've no idea what you are talking about. I don't see the 21st century mentioned anywhere in the passage.

That is because you don't understand 2 Peter 3:3-8. The 21st century is mentioned with the word, "beloved."

 

[Hammster]

That is because you don't understand 2 Peter 3:3-8. The 21st century is mentioned with the word, "beloved."

I'm know Greek scholar, but I'm going out on a limb and saying that you're wrong.

 

[Kenneth Redden]

I thought you were going to use the KJV to prove the KJV.

Yes, of course, why?

 

[Hammster]

Yes, of course, why?

You haven't, yet.

 

[Kenneth Redden]

I'm know Greek scholar, but I'm going out on a limb and saying that you're wrong.

The everlasting is mentioned with the words, "Knowing this first;" the first day is mentioned with, "days" in 2 Peter 3:3; this is
"from the beginning," as mentioned in 2 Peter 3:4. The second day is mentioned with, "overflowed with water, perished", in 2 Peter 3:6, which makes 2 Peter 3:7 the third day, and "beloved" the fourth day. Therefore the two times, "day" occurs in 2 Peter 3:8, represents the fifth and the sixth day.

 

[Hammster]

The everlasting is mentioned with the words, "Knowing this first;" the first day is mentioned with, "days" in 2 Peter 3:3; this is
"from the beginning," as mentioned in 2 Peter 3:4. The second day is mentioned with, "overflowed with water, perished", in 2 Peter 3:6, which makes 2 Peter 3:7 the third day, and "beloved" the fourth day. Therefore the two times, "day" occurs in 2 Peter 3:8, represents the fifth and the sixth day.

That's your interpretation. And nowhere in all of that does it state that the KJV is the perfect translation.

 

[Kenneth Redden]

Uh, Paul wrote 2 Peter?

Yes, it all came from the apostle Paul. 2 Peter 3:15-16

 

[Hammster]

Yes, it all came from the apostle Paul. 2 Peter 3:15-16

You are quickly losing your argument. Even giving you the benefit of the doubt, you make no sense.

 

[Kenneth Redden]

That's your interpretation. And nowhere in all of that does it state that the KJV is the perfect translation.

Okay, what about, Revelation 22:18-19. Sounds perfect to me.

 

[SnowyMacie]

Yes, it all came from the apostle Paul. 2 Peter 3:15-16

So he's referring to himself in the 3rd person?

 

[Hammster]

Okay, what about, Revelation 22:18-19. Sounds perfect to me.

18 For I protest unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book;

19 And if any man shall diminish of the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy City, and from those things which are written in this book.


That's from the Geneva Bible.

 

[Kenneth Redden]

You are quickly losing your argument. Even giving you the benefit of the doubt, you make no sense.

Well, I know there are some people that just can't get this perspective. Don't worry about it, it's not import

So he's referring to himself in the 3rd person?

I give all the credit to Paul for this interpretation. Ephesians 3:3-4

 

[Kenneth Redden]

18 For I protest unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book;

19 And if any man shall diminish of the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy City, and from those things which are written in this book.


That's from the Geneva Bible.

No wonder, it's the wrong Bible for thus study.

 

[Hammster]

No wonder, it's the wrong Bible for thus study.

And yet you've not proven why. You just keep assuming it to be true.

 

[SnowyMacie]

I give all the credit to Paul for this interpretation. Ephesians 3:3-4

What does this have anything to do with who wrote 2nd Peter and the fact that Paul is referred to as "our brother" and "him", "his".

 

[civilwarbuff]

I got that from the Science channel. Go ask them.

Now there is a dependable source.....

 

[civilwarbuff]

Yes, it all came from the apostle Paul. 2 Peter 3:15-16

You have evidence of this, correct? If so, please present the evidence (not some wildly interpreted verse that you post).