- Sep 23, 2005
- 32,694
- 6,110
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I did not duck it at all. I already responded to it.
http://www.christianforums.com/t7629290-3/#post59714818
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You continue to ignore the issues I raised to you.
Does the bible have apparent contradictions???
If yes, could they be:
1. result of our limited understanding
2. non-consequential and non-salvational
I apply the same rules to the spirit of prophecy.
Knowing the result equals no risk?
Lets suppose you bought a lottery ticket yesterday. Then today you found out you didn't win.
What's the chance of winning for you before and at the time of purchase? Did the result make the chance of winning zero?
Absolutely not! If you had not brought the ticket, your chance of winning would have been zero. If you had brought all the tickets that covered every possible combination, your chance of winning would have been 100%.
But everything else is in between. The result has nothing to do with the probability in the process.
Furthermore, while we are doing the text proving, I'd like ask for the text where the bible says knowing the end from the beginning is the same as no risk.
Is there such a text?
So you must believe Christ didn't have free choice? Can we get that out of the way? Yes or no.
Tall,
You are attempting to show EGW's writings say God does not know the end from the beginning.
I put a couple of key words (God knows end) in the White Estate search engine. It returned 83 matches. Here are some examples that contradict what you said.
'God knows the end from the beginning. He is acquainted with the hearts of all human beings. He reads every secret of the soul. He knows whether those for whom prayer is offered would be able to endure the trials that would come upon them should they live.' ---The Ministry of Health and Healing, p. 125.2
'The purpose and plan of grace existed from all eternity. Before the foundation of the world it was according to the determinate counsel of God that man should be created, endowed with power to do the divine will. But the defection of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent, and yet it did not deter Him from carrying out His eternal purpose; for the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness. God knows the end from the beginning.... Therefore redemption was not an afterthought ... but an eternal purpose to be wrought out for the blessing not only of this atom of a world but for the good of all the worlds which God has created.' --Gods Amazing Grace, p. 129.2
But does not God know? Is there not knowledge with the Most High? Our God sees our hearts in a different light from that in which we see them. He is acquainted with our secret thoughts. He searches into the hidden recesses of our nature. He sends answers to our prayers, when we are filled with uneasiness and distress. He gives ear to our inward groanings, and reveals to us the plague spots in our characters, that we may overcome defects, instead of being overcome by them. When unknown chapters in regard to ourselves are opened before us, the test and the trial come; and the question is, whether or not we will accept the reproof and the counsel of God. Will we cling to our own ideas and plans, and value ourselves more highly than we ought? God knows better than we do what is good for his children; and if they could see their real necessity as he does, they would say that the Lord had dealt most wisely with them. The ways of the Lord are obscure to him who desires to see things in a pleasing light to himself. God can discern the end of his purpose from the beginning; but because the Lords ways are not mans ways, they appear dark, severe, and painful to our human natures. But Gods ways are ways of mercy, and their end is salvation and blessedness. -- RH July 3, 1888, par. 6
Peter saw the error into which he had fallen, and immediately set about repairing the evil that had been wrought, so far as was in his power. God, who knows the end from the beginning, permitted Peter to reveal this weakness of character in order that the tried apostle might see that there was nothing in himself whereof he might boast. Even the best of men, if left to themselves, will err in judgment. God also saw that in time to come some would be so deluded as to claim for Peter and his pretended successors the exalted prerogatives that belong to God alone. --The Acts of the Apostles, p. 198.1
You try to mud the water and misinterpret what she wrote. You are saying if you knew the result, there would be no risk. But God doesn't look at the time the way you do because He is not confined to the time dimension as you and I are and He does not perceive things the way a finite man does.
And in plain language, her writings are in harmony with the bible on this subject.
It's science. 1+1=2 is not in the bible but it's still universal truth that can not disproved.
You look at space with a point of reference. You look at time with a point of reference. God live outside these dimension and yet He is at every point of reference.
It's pointless to argue with you. I've shown you in my previous post EGW's writing glorify God as the one who knows the end from the beginning. That's all it matters what it clearly says not what's interpreted.
That's the old adage: don't tell me what it means, tell me what it says.
I don't disagree and EGW's writings agree with Daniel 2. But it says the end result and the interpretation is sure, but it doesn't say there is no risk.
Perhaps we could ponder this spectacle from another direction...
...By contemplating the probability of Napoleon Bonaparte leading Lucifers army.
...When it attacks the holy City subsequent to the 2nd Coming of Christ.
Ellen White
Then Jesus and the holy angels, accompanied by all the saints, again go to the City, and the bitter lamentations and wailings of the doomed wicked fill the air. Then I saw that Satan again commenced his work. He passed around among his subjects, and made the feeble and weak strong, and then he told them that he and his angels were powerful. He then pointed to the countless millions who had been raised. There were mighty warriors and kings who were well skilled in battle, and who had conquered kingdoms. And there were mighty giants, and men who were valiant, and had never lost a battle. There WAS the proud, ambitious Napoleon whose approach had caused kingdoms to tremble. There stood men of very high stature, and of dignified, lofty bearing, who had fallen in battle. They fell while thirsting to conquer. As they come forth from their graves, they resume the current of their thoughts where it ceased in death. They possess the same spirit to conquer which ruled when they fell. Satan consults with his angels, and then with those kings and conquerors and mighty men. Then he looks over the vast army and tells them that the company in the City is small and feeble, and that they can go up and take that City, and cast out its inhabitants, and possess its riches and glory themselves. Satan succeeds in deceiving them, and all immediately commence to fit themselves for battle. They construct weapons of war; for there are many skillful men in that vast army. And then with Satan at their head, the multitude move on. Kings and warriors follow close after Satan, and the multitude follow after in companies. Every company has a leader, and order is observed as they march over the broken surface of the earth to the holy City
I would be interested in hearing from Seventh-day Adventists about the percentage of probability...
...That Napoleon Bonaparte will participate in the battle of the holy City - on the side of Lucifer.
...And if the probability is 100%, what in SDA theology and Biblical process - gifts what Ellen says - OVER Scripture?
If the probability is anything less than 100% that Napoleon Bonaparte will help lead Lucifer's army...
...What does that say for the other prophetic utterances issued from the mouth of Ellen?
I think you have made my day...
Napoleon Bonaparte, huh?
I guess Hitler will be there as well... but EGW couldnt have known him so he is not in the vision.
Who else do you think will be there?
Stalin?
Gadaffi?
Saddam?
If Christ had free choice such as we do, there was risk involved.
Jesus did have free choice as we do, but chose to be 100% obedient to His Father. He willingly went to His death on the cross.
Christ is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow = there is no change in God...
...Jesus said He ALWAYS did the will of the Father.
...And unless something is twisted so that it's said Christ is always the same UNLESS He chooses to not be the same?
It appears to be the same type of question / reasoning used to validate....
....God knows the end from the beginning in everything except IF God would be able to complete His Salvic act?
Like I've aways said Stryder - as a Catholic Christian I believe that God can do ANYTHING....
...Except NOT BE GOD.
And from my perspective an eternally annihilated dead God isn't a God anyway....
...And according to what I'm reading in the Bible a conditional God isn't a God in the first place.
Jesus did have free choice as we do, but chose to be 100% obedient to His Father. He willingly went to His death on the cross.
Sure He did.
And BEFORE He went on His mission it would be quite clear what He would choose and that it would be successful.
And if it would not be He wouldn't go.
zero risk.
Free will has risk assoicated with it. Christ was just like Adam. Adam didn't have to sin, but he did. Christ, could have but didn't.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?