• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Yes, Jesus spent time with sinners while He was on this earth; but also Jesus got away from people and prayed. So, Jesus was not in the presence of sinners 24/7, I offer.
My point was not that he was with sinners 24/7 but that he was with sinners.

God is present with us while we sin. But our sinning can make us deeply degraded so we are not experiencing God in His love.
Ok, many christians do not believe this. Why are you right and they are wrong.
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,018
6,440
Utah
✟852,453.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I have not said I require only material evidence. I require good evidence. That potentially can be anything, not just material. I am not aware of good evidence to believe that the supernatural exists.

Go ahead and question my sincerity if you must to keep your theology intact.

Evolution and other sciences shows that the bible cannot be taken literally. Science has no answers for how the ultimate beginning happened.
We do know how it was created after it started, and it differs from the biblical account.
But a god could have started it.

We do know how it was created after it started, and it differs from the biblical account.

Based on theory(ies) ... and within the scientific community many many theories amongst themselves ....

many theories on how "it" ... beginning of the universe started

But a god could have started it.

good ... well at least you leave the door somewhat open ;o)

What about mathematical probability?

see PDF file hereto
 

Attachments

  • evolution_mathmatical_possiblity.pdf
    21.6 KB · Views: 21
Upvote 0

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
651
✟132,668.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Just because we don't know how life began does not mean we get to insert a god. The correct answer is I don't know until we have sufficient evidence to believe one way or the other.

Since the natural world does not convince me a god exists this I know this scripture is wrong. I know it says I suppress the truth but I know I am not doing that.​

Ok, why should I believe any of this?

Or maybe he could have just forgiven us without the need for a sacrifice and all would be saved. He makes the rules right? This is what he asks of us to forgive others that do wrong to us. I have children and when they are disrespectful to me I don't threaten the with death and then give them a vague notion about how to be forgiven that is unclear. I teach them about what is right and why, how it makes me feel when they are disrespectful to me etc. I do this because I love them.

Anyway I will ask again, why should I believe any of this?
I don't think I have an answer to "why should I believe any of this" that will satisfy you. And that is your repeated question. So I'm going to exit. Be well.
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,018
6,440
Utah
✟852,453.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
If so, then your god is immoral to let this happen. To allow intentional convincing false evidence that will send people to hell if they believe it.

If so, then your god is immoral to let this happen.

no He is not immoral ... His divine character is moral ... and He (being the creator), put laws & principles defining what is moral and what is immoral ... in regard to our behavior & character and how to treat one another.

root word
moral

concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character

Statements like this is why I do question your claim of "18 years as a christian" ....
sin .... basic ... no way you didn't understand this ... "being a christian for 18 years"

If you understood the basics of sin ... and have now decided God does not exist (due to lack of physical evidence) and that you evolved from the animal kingdom (as science includes humans in with all mammals) .... animals are described in His word as beasts.

The Bible clearly distinguishes between man and beast—something evolution does not do.

So you have decided and believe you are a beast ... ok ... He won't stop you from believing that ... we are free to believe whatever we want.
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,717
6,627
Massachusetts
✟645,739.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
God is present with us while we sin. But our sinning can make us deeply degraded so we are not experiencing God in His love.
Ok, many christians do not believe this. Why are you right and they are wrong.
I am not sure why ones would disagree. Maybe they don't understand what I mean.

God is loving the person while he or she is sinning. But sinning has the person in what is not love; so God can be so loving the person, but the person is on a different wavelength than love > for example >

"she who lives in pleasure is dead while she lives." (in 1 Timothy 5:6)

So . . . I mean . . . God is loving her, but in her self-seeking nature she is not alive in love, but "dead", meaning love-dead. And, of course, the principle of this can apply to a man, too. And so, I mean, such a person is being loved by God, but not experiencing Him loving the person. Because the person is in a wrong spirit which is not of His love.

It is like how you can have soothing jazz music being sent to your radio, but if you have acidity chaotic stuff channeled in, you can't experience the soothing music, at the same time.

"Let all that you do be done with love." (1 Corinthians 16:14)

Therefore, if I am self-righteously looking down on wrong people, I can not at the same time be enjoying God in the kindness of His love . . . while I am being unkind and not compassionate for wrong people. Or, if I am just using women to look at them, at the same time I can not be really caring for them and tenderly sharing with them.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Based on theory(ies) ... and within the scientific community many many theories amongst themselves ....

many theories on how "it" ... beginning of the universe started
Can you tell me what a scientific theory is?

But a god could have started it.

good ... well at least you leave the door somewhat open ;o)
Yes and Big Foot could also have created the universe. I am open to it if you can provide evidence.

What about mathematical probability?

see PDF file hereto
Have you told this to the scientific community? If you are correct here then you would be famous. When you convince the scientific community that evolution is impossible then I will change my stance. TOE is the most supported theory in all of science by evidence and it isn't even close.

I also noted that in this paper it states misleading things about evolution. Such as assigning good and bad to mutations inferring a goal. It also talks about single organisms evolving. Populations evolve not single organisms. These lead me to believe the author is not well versed in evolutionary theory.

Highly improbable events happens all the time. The reason you get a low probability is that you have the end defined. If I dealt you 13 cards and they were all spades would you think that was more improbable than any other combination? It isn't. The only reason we tend to think so is that we see an order or can notice that since they are all the same. But it is just as probable you get any combination of 13 cards.

Once life started there was no choice but evolution to happen through mostly natural selection. It was inevitable. Do you know why 87% of all scientists believe evolution happened and greater than 97% of biologists?
 
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I don't think I have an answer to "why should I believe any of this" that will satisfy you. And that is your repeated question. So I'm going to exit. Be well.
Thanks for the discussion. Do you have an answer to my question for yourself? I hope so.
 
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
no He is not immoral ... His divine character is moral ... and He (being the creator), put laws & principles defining what is moral and what is immoral ... in regard to our behavior & character and how to treat one another.

root word
moral

concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character
I disagree with Gods morality as described in the bible.

Statements like this is why I do question your claim of "18 years as a christian" ....
sin .... basic ... no way you didn't understand this ... "being a christian for 18 years"
Why do you think I don't understand sin?

If you understood the basics of sin ... and have now decided God does not exist (due to lack of physical evidence) and that you evolved from the animal kingdom (as science includes humans in with all mammals) .... animals are described in His word as beasts.

The Bible clearly distinguishes between man and beast—something evolution does not do.

So you have decided and believe you are a beast ... ok ... He won't stop you from believing that ... we are free to believe whatever we want.
Where did I say I have decided I am a beast?

Humans evolved just like all the other animals. However, that does not mean we are like all the other animals in every way. We have intelligence that exceeds all other animals. We have moral systems that we apply to ourselves, we have value and dignity that we apply to ourselves. We are different.
 
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I am not sure why ones would disagree. Maybe they don't understand what I mean.
Do you understand that there are many different beliefs about what the bible teaches?

God is loving the person while he or she is sinning. But sinning has the person in what is not love; so God can be so loving the person, but the person is on a different wavelength than love > for example >

"she who lives in pleasure is dead while she lives." (in 1 Timothy 5:6)

So . . . I mean . . . God is loving her, but in her self-seeking nature she is not alive in love, but "dead", meaning love-dead. And, of course, the principle of this can apply to a man, too. And so, I mean, such a person is being loved by God, but not experiencing Him loving the person. Because the person is in a wrong spirit which is not of His love.

It is like how you can have soothing jazz music being sent to your radio, but if you have acidity chaotic stuff channeled in, you can't experience the soothing music, at the same time.

"Let all that you do be done with love." (1 Corinthians 16:14)

Therefore, if I am self-righteously looking down on wrong people, I can not at the same time be enjoying God in the kindness of His love . . . while I am being unkind and not compassionate for wrong people. Or, if I am just using women to look at them, at the same time I can not be really caring for them and tenderly sharing with them.
So why should I believe your interpretation over another Christians different interpretation?
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,717
6,627
Massachusetts
✟645,739.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So why should I believe your interpretation over another Christians different interpretation?
only if God blesses you to . . .

not to mention . . . some varying interpretations might not disagree, but they complement one another; and so they are not "over", but supplementing . . .
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,018
6,440
Utah
✟852,453.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Can you tell me what a scientific theory is?

Yes and Big Foot could also have created the universe. I am open to it if you can provide evidence.

Have you told this to the scientific community? If you are correct here then you would be famous. When you convince the scientific community that evolution is impossible then I will change my stance. TOE is the most supported theory in all of science by evidence and it isn't even close.

I also noted that in this paper it states misleading things about evolution. Such as assigning good and bad to mutations inferring a goal. It also talks about single organisms evolving. Populations evolve not single organisms. These lead me to believe the author is not well versed in evolutionary theory.

Highly improbable events happens all the time. The reason you get a low probability is that you have the end defined. If I dealt you 13 cards and they were all spades would you think that was more improbable than any other combination? It isn't. The only reason we tend to think so is that we see an order or can notice that since they are all the same. But it is just as probable you get any combination of 13 cards.

Once life started there was no choice but evolution to happen through mostly natural selection. It was inevitable. Do you know why 87% of all scientists believe evolution happened and greater than 97% of biologists?

I know much about evolution and theories and how science views them ... empirical and yada yada, yada .... you believe in evolution fine .... I do not .... I agree to disagree and am moving on ... mostly because of your sarcasm ... never haver cared for that tone of conversation.
 
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
only if God blesses you to . . .

not to mention . . . some varying interpretations might not disagree, but they complement one another; and so they are not "over", but supplementing . . .
This is true but there are many that directly contradict one another.
 
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I know much about evolution and theories and how science views them ... empirical and yada yada, yada .... you believe in evolution fine .... I do not ....
What is the evidence for evolution that scientists find convincing?

I agree to disagree and am moving on ... mostly because of your sarcasm ... never haver cared for that tone of conversation.
What do you perceive as sarcastic?
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,717
6,627
Massachusetts
✟645,739.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This is true but there are many that directly contradict one another.
But a number of items are seen to be contradictory when they are not. So, it depends. The way someone understands things in the Bible, for example, can make them look like a contradiction.

What helps me is I might look for the love meaning of each thing, and see how each idea or some part of it helps me to find out how to love better; and if what people are saying turns out to be merely arguing themselves right and only keeping my attention busy, I might just leave that alone.

And there are people who just don't want certain things to be true; so they invent arguments.

In our human way, we can have a way of seeing things the way we dictate has to be true.

For example, if I love candy, it is possible for me to invent all sorts of denial about diabetes and dental bills and diet. I might even say there is a conspiracy against candy lovers. And even if you pin me with proof, then I could say, "I don't care." The bottom line can be what I want, and this because of my character being my dictator.

So, there are motives included, not only ideas and scholarship and logic. And God's word discerns "the thoughts and intents of the heart", we have in Hebrews 4:12. To me, this includes how God's word exposes . . . brings out . . . what is really going on in each person.

Like this, when Jesus showed up, people came out the way they really were.

So . . . to some extent, each one's beliefs are coming from each person's real character with his or her motives. And we are reaping what we have been sowing. How we are becoming is our proof >

"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. For he who sows to his flesh will of the flesh reap corruption, but he who sows to the Spirit will of the Spirit reap everlasting life." (Galatians 6:7-8)

Even now, I can see, already we are reaping . . . spiritually and emotionally . . . according to whatever each of us really has been sowing. And in the resurrection each will reap so much more. But I think we are each getting a sample, now . . . of more and worse misery and ruin, or of how ones of us are growing in "rest for your souls" (Matthew 11:28-30) of enjoying God in His peace while loving any and all people . . . in sharing with one another as Jesus family.

So . . . about if God dwells in the presence of sin . . . we are reaping more and more personal sharing with God in His love, or not exactly. Our character has a lot to do with if we are on His love wavelength or not. So, this is not only about making gestures to please God > if my character has me in selfish motives in my ministering > this could be why I am in truth not enjoying deep and sensitive sharing with God. I can't fool this into happening!!

So, if someone says God does not dwell in the presence of sin, where is this person really coming from? There are very self-righteous people who are about control and getting a name for themselves, and praise. So, they can invent and/or pick and choose moral principles, then say, God won't dwell with you if you don't do what we dictate. But then we see how they are becoming as people, because of what they really are reaping.

I myself have been one to look down on anyone and everyone, but maybe using correct things of the Bible. But it got me more and more into a miserable and confused mess in my own self. I became my best proof of how I was wrong!!!! Ones of us have been very clever in how we have been wrong, but what matters will be what we have done as the proof has set in more and more. We find out what our stuff is getting us > it is not only about logical and scientific whatever, but this is deeper.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
But a number of items are seen to be contradictory when they are not. So, it depends. The way someone understands things in the Bible, for example, can make them look like a contradiction.
I am not talking about biblical contradictions. I am talking about when Christians have different interpretations of the same scripture. How do I know which interpretation is correct?

What helps me is I might look for the love meaning of each thing, and see how each idea or some part of it helps me to find out how to love better; and if what people are saying turns out to be merely arguing themselves right and only keeping my attention busy, I might just leave that alone.

And there are people who just don't want certain things to be true; so they invent arguments.

In our human way, we can have a way of seeing things the way we dictate has to be true.

For example, if I love candy, it is possible for me to invent all sorts of denial about diabetes and dental bills and diet. I might even say there is a conspiracy against candy lovers. And even if you pin me with proof, then I could say, "I don't care." The bottom line can be what I want, and this because of my character being my dictator.

So, there are motives included, not only ideas and scholarship and logic. And God's word discerns "the thoughts and intents of the heart", we have in Hebrews 4:12. To me, this includes how God's word exposes . . . brings out . . . what is really going on in each person.

Like this, when Jesus showed up, people came out the way they really were.

So . . . to some extent, each one's beliefs are coming from each person's real character with his or her motives. And we are reaping what we have been sowing. How we are becoming is our proof >

"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. For he who sows to his flesh will of the flesh reap corruption, but he who sows to the Spirit will of the Spirit reap everlasting life." (Galatians 6:7-8)

Even now, I can see, already we are reaping . . . spiritually and emotionally . . . according to whatever each of us really has been sowing. And in the resurrection each will reap so much more. But I think we are each getting a sample, now . . . of more and worse misery and ruin, or of how ones of us are growing in "rest for your souls" (Matthew 11:28-30) of enjoying God in His peace while loving any and all people . . . in sharing with one another as Jesus family.

So . . . about if God dwells in the presence of sin . . . we are reaping more and more personal sharing with God in His love, or not exactly. Our character has a lot to do with if we are on His love wavelength or not. So, this is not only about making gestures to please God > if my character has me in selfish motives in my ministering > this could be why I am in truth not enjoying deep and sensitive sharing with God. I can't fool this into happening!!

So, if someone says God does not dwell in the presence of sin, where is this person really coming from? There are very self-righteous people who are about control and getting a name for themselves, and praise. So, they can invent and/or pick and choose moral principles, then say, God won't dwell with you if you don't do what we dictate. But then we see how they are becoming as people, because of what they really are reaping.

I myself have been one to look down on anyone and everyone, but maybe using correct things of the Bible. But it got me more and more into a miserable and confused mess in my own self. I became my best proof of how I was wrong!!!! Ones of us have been very clever in how we have been wrong, but what matters will be what we have done as the proof has set in more and more. We find out what our stuff is getting us > it is not only about logical and scientific whatever, but this is deeper.
So why should I believe your beliefs about all of this. My point is that you have your own way of interpreting the bible and others have theirs. There is really no way to know which is correct. Personal revelation would be nice but then people claim personal revelation that are contradictory as well.
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,717
6,627
Massachusetts
✟645,739.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I am not talking about biblical contradictions. I am talking about when Christians have different interpretations of the same scripture. How do I know which interpretation is correct?
I was using that to illustrate how people can see contradictions where there are none. Like with reading the Bible, ones can see different views of people as being contradictory. But there can be things which can work together . . . even though ones arguing can make it seem like they contradict.

So, how do I know? Possibly, I don't go there, but I simply see what I can get out of each thing . . . to help me find out how to love.

There can be ideas which have nothing to do with helping me to find out how to love. And they might even be meant to distract me; so I often enough don't bother with stuff which does not help me to love. What matters more than how to know is being able to know where my attention belongs. By keeping my attention in the right place, this can help me to find the right ideas, though.

For example, let's say a group has some idea they say they got from the Bible, but then they say not a word about how to apply it for loving . . . but instead they only say oh everyone else is wrong, only we are right, so you have to join us . . . I likely will just scrap that idea, especially if it does not obviously help me to love and is not obviously what the Bible says. It can be a trick to get me tied up with what can not be proven or disproven.
 
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I was using that to illustrate how people can see contradictions where there are none. Like with reading the Bible, ones can see different views of people as being contradictory. But there can be things which can work together . . . even though ones arguing can make it seem like they contradict.
Yes, but there are things that actually do contradict. For example Jer 29:11:

“For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.”

Some think this verse applies to Christians today and some think this only applied to the Jews at the time. Two different interpretations of the same scripture, how do you determine who is correct if any. They cannot both be correct.

So, how do I know? Possibly, I don't go there, but I simply see what I can get out of each thing . . . to help me find out how to love.

There can be ideas which have nothing to do with helping me to find out how to love. And they might even be meant to distract me; so I often enough don't bother with stuff which does not help me to love. What matters more than how to know is being able to know where my attention belongs. By keeping my attention in the right place, this can help me to find the right ideas, though.

For example, let's say a group has some idea they say they got from the Bible, but then they say not a word about how to apply it for loving . . . but instead they only say oh everyone else is wrong, only we are right, so you have to join us . . . I likely will just scrap that idea, especially if it does not obviously help me to love and is not obviously what the Bible says. It can be a trick to get me tied up with what can not be proven or disproven.
Why is this love standard the correct one? Why can't someone say:

"For example, let's say a group has some idea they say they got from the Bible, but then they say not a word about how to apply it for obedience . . . but instead they only say oh everyone else is wrong, only we are right, so you have to join us . . . I likely will just scrap that idea, especially if it does not obviously help me to be more obedient and is not obviously what the Bible says. It can be a trick to get me tied up with what can not be proven or disproven."

Why should I accept your standard for biblical interpretation over another's?
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,717
6,627
Massachusetts
✟645,739.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Yes, but there are things that actually do contradict. For example Jer 29:11:

“For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.”

Some think this verse applies to Christians today and some think this only applied to the Jews at the time. Two different interpretations of the same scripture, how do you determine who is correct if any. They cannot both be correct.
Thank you for giving us a specific example, something which I did not do for you! . . . with my generalizing.

This is an example of what I mean by two "sides" making it seem it is one or the other.

My short answer is > how God meant it for the Jews then is not how He means it for Christians, today. And how He means that scripture for us now is not how He used it with Jews way back then. However, there is what is common for both the Jews then and us now.

Therefore, it is not a clearcut one way or the other thing.

Now, in case you dare to go through a longer answer > here you are >

How God meant it for the Jews, then, indeed is not for Christians today. At that time, His promise was mainly for the Jews who were expected to live in the Promised Land with a national family culture who kept the Law of Moses. But now God means all Christians, worldwide and in eternity, who are God's one "holy nation" (1 Peter 2:9) and one family, and this in keeping with our New Covenant of Jesus Christ's shed blood for us . . . not what was for the Jews then.

Therefore, there are not two simple sides, for this.

And here I offer a l-o-n-g answer . . . in case you have made it, thus far :) >

We can see how the prosperity, of the Jews then and us Jesus people now, has had common elements > our great prosperity includes God, Himself, whom the Jews did have, also. Plus, we have a love family culture, which the Jews were supposed to have. God and family caring and sharing love are included in the greatest blessings of true prosperity.

But it seems there is more attention given to material things and activity, in the Jewish Law and the prosperity it talks about . . . while in the New Testament there is more attention and emphasis with spiritual prosperity.

Even so . . . there is material prosperity detailed in our New Covenant >

For one example, about possessions and family > each Jewish family usually had their own land property, but Jesus says if a person leaves one's land (and other things and one's own family), for the sake of Jesus, he will receive "a hundredfold now in this present time" of "lands" (among other things > see Mark 10:29-31). So, Jesus is guaranteeing . . . for your personal prosperity, how if you leave your own land for Christ, He will prosper you with a hundred times as many lands as you have left. Prosperity preachers aren't saying this, to my knowledge, by the way :) So, this is different than how Jews would keep and stay on their own families' lands.

But . . . like I have offered . . . there is the love meaning to God's word. Do I now have a hundred times as many lands in my personal possession and control? No. But by adopting more and more people with my love, I have adopted what they have; and I can enjoy what they have . . . without taking it from them and controlling what they have . . . and without trying to use them to get or use what they have. But I said "enjoy" . . . not use and exploit. God "gives us richly all things to enjoy." (in 1 Timothy 6:17)

This, of course, includes how I enjoy that they pay the bills. That's prosperity!!

So, then - - my understanding is, that I have so much . . . but this in sharing as family with others.

Now, here's another example of how the prosperity of the Jews could be different than our prosperity in Christ >

"the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus."
This is in Philippians 4:6-7.

In case, anyone contests that peace of heart and mind is very highly valuable prosperity > how much money and time has been invested in trying to have peace in the hearts and the minds of humans? People have invested money and much time of their lives in drug research, in paying for study to become counselors and priests and preachers and psychologists and psychiatrists and mental health nurses, and others. But Jesus guarantees us this peace, free of charge > "freely you have received, freely give," He says in Matthew 10:8, and "My peace I give to you," in John 14:27.

This is in our New Testament. But if you know God's word, I hear you or someone now thinking to me, that in the early scriptures . . . it also is written >

"'You will keep him in perfect peace,
. Whose mind is stayed on You,
. Because he trusts in You.'"

. . . . . . . . (Isaiah 26:3)

But the New Testament presentation shows a much more clear connection of God's peace with how He wants us to pray >

"Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God; and the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus." (Philippians 4:6-7)

Also, I note how the Isaiah version says "perfect peace", while our Apostle Paul says "the peace of God". For me, personally, saying directly that it is God's own peace can help me see how therefore this peace is of God who is Almighty, and therefore this peace is almighty to easily guard our hearts and our minds from any kind of chaotic and cruel and confusing stuff . . . and any anti-love stuff such as unforgiveness and how I can give in to paranoid self-righteously condemning imagination tripping, by the way; and this peace of God's all-loving love will have us all-loving, instead.

And the New Testament version addresses us as God's family . . . as a whole . . . not only some individual "him" who will have peace . . . though it can be readily understand that Isaiah means all God's people of that time.

Now we have more clear emphasis that God wants us to care in prayer for all of us, and even for any and all enemies of God. Having His peace is connected with this prayer all-loving. So, our requests being made known to God are not only for our own prosperity, indeed.

And 1 Timothy 2:1-4 can help us see this, I would say. The Jews back then were not given such a clear blessing of how God wants us to pray with hope for any and all people. So, our prosperity of God doing us good and giving us a hope includes how our Father all-loving has us personally sharing with Him in His all-loving love which has us so praying for any and all, not only for our own selves.

"For if you love those who love you, what reward have you?" (in Matthew 5:46)

So, while I may listen to and read what people say, on different sides of an issue, I am noticing their "therefores".

Do they have an all-loving context and message in how they present what they demand that all accept?

Or, are they mainly congratulating themselves and/or some group and/or some religious leader of the past, or a big-namer of the present??

But yes I can be mistaken; so most of all I need however God will really correct me so I get things correct. I can be my own main problem, then. And the way I can be wrong has mainly to do with immoral and self-righteous stuff that can be going on in my mind; so whether or not my beliefs are wrong is not my main concern.

Immoral and self-righteous stuff is clearly anti-love; how I might be mistaken in a belief, I would say, is not necessarily such a love issue. So, my main emphasis I would say needs to be to how I need deep correction so I love for real while pleasing our Father and Jesus.

So, I can be doing wisely not to get decoyed with only trying to prove my ideas to be right. But I trust God to have me doing well . . . since I am capable of fooling myself and not even knowing it. And you're right > since I too am not perfect, like everyone else, what I do can be what does not work. This is why we need Jesus. He can make sure we get all He desires for us . . . not only the correct ideas.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Paul.

I think therefore I post
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2008
324
35
Australia
✟194,141.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Divorced
I am looking for sufficient evidence, evidence that would convince me.

Based on my reading of your posts, I believe you accept logic and reason as being valid for creating arguments that point towards the existence of God. Please correct me if I am mistaken.

Do you also believe that truth exists and can be known? I expect that you do but would like it confirmed as it means I do not need to prove it.

I expect you would also agree with the statement: IF the existence of God is true (agreeing with the conclusion based on the unproven premise of God's existence is no agreement of the premise on your part) then there will be sufficient evidence to show that the existence of God is reasonable, rational and knowable. Do you agree?
 
Upvote 0