Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Which puts responsibility squarely on the Georgia legislature.“Georgia's current secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, told CNN a signature audit is outside his office's legal purview. It would need to be ordered by a court, and currently, there is no basis to conduct one.”
“Make me!”
Which puts responsibility squarely on the Georgia legislature.
Which seems to be the clear message Giuliani & Jenna Ellis have taken on the road to the legislatures informing them of allegations with signed affidavits & quoting the section of the USC that specifies the legislatures' authority.
Since this approach is with the USC, it seems a good appeal point to the Supreme Court if nothing gets done???
And some, Christians or not, don't believe all the statistics about all deaths being from Covid. And some believe........... Whether nefarious or incompetence or mistakes or ???, there is more than 1 issue here.
Incorrect.
The actual legal remedy in such matters is to remove the number of defective ballots from the appropriate stack of ballots.
Which puts responsibility squarely on the Georgia legislature.
They don’t believe COVID death is because that fit the narrative of the political party they support. They will all believe in COVID related death as soon as Biden take over the WH.
I don't understand what you are saying here -- are you claiming that if the legislatures refuse to act that Giuliani can appeal to the Supreme Court?
No. I'm simply saying that the legislatures are obviously part of a legal strategy or all we'd be seeing is lawsuits.
Some legal analysts I've read have pointed out that constitutionally, the ones in charge of such election matters are the legislatures and the opinion is that some judges and state government officials have been making decisions re: elections that are constitutionally not within their authority.
I'd suppose how this would get to the Supreme Court is via the usual process, but all of what comes before the SC it seems may be a bit more complex and the legal team may well be covering bases with a view to a more complete case at the high court. Maybe not. If nothing else, the matters being presented to the legislatures seem constitutionally where such things should go or should have gone first.
No. I'm simply saying that the legislatures are obviously part of a legal strategy or all we'd be seeing is lawsuits.
Some legal analysts I've read have pointed out that constitutionally, the ones in charge of such election matters are the legislatures and the opinion is that some judges and state government officials have been making decisions re: elections that are constitutionally not within their authority.
I'd suppose how this would get to the Supreme Court is via the usual process, but all of what comes before the SC it seems may be a bit more complex and the legal team may well be covering bases with a view to a more complete case at the high court. Maybe not. If nothing else, the matters being presented to the legislatures seem constitutionally where such things should go or should have gone first.
I have a hard time seeing how a proper legal analysis would make that conclusion.
Not completely true on the first statement. You're dreaming on the second one.
The Georgia legislature can enact any election legislation that it deems wise for future elections but (already) existing Law rules today.
You can’t “change the rules” after the game has been played, to affect this past election.
Thanks for your input.
Maybe this article will help. FWIW I just searched for one and this came up. I've no underlying position in choosing it, but it seems to cover the how's and whys of the current approach to the legislatures. Maybe it'll answer your questions:
Why President Trump Has A Legal Case To Contest Pennsylvania (thefederalist.com)
They will believe in COVID death in Biden administration because that way they can count “how many COVID death per day under Biden” and blame him for it! This is like the de-ja –vu with economy , under Obama unemployment rate 4.0 was a hoax and fabricated , but under Trump the very rate was the testament of how Trump economy was doing!
Two points, the strategy being talked about is one crafted by Jenna Ellis, Trump's lawyer. So, not only does she have a reason to want to push her idea as correct, she also does not have a strong background in election law (there is a similar article, for those wanting a more "right wing" source, in the Wall Street Journal).
Thanks. Understand your thinking better, but it'll be a big turn-around for many to start counting deaths when positioned that so many reported Covid deaths are not really Covid. Also, there is an increasing number positioning that enough is enough with all this shut-down and distancing stuff. Biden's apparent statement about a national mask mandate for 100 days is going to go over quite well I'm sure (assuming he gets to make such a mandate).
Politically you could very well be right - the hypocrisy is ever there & little surprises at this point. I guess we'll see.
Governor Kemp is doing the work of Satan along with legions of Republicans involved in the election process in Georgia?"Thou shall not bear false witness" is not something the folks in control of this election understand but that is expected when they are doing satan's bidding
I don't see this being about someone trying to change the rules now, but re: rules, seeking to show how the rules were changed illegally before the election (and how and why the alleged fraud happened).
This pertains to PA, but it seems to detail some of the legal approach being made to the legislatures:
Why President Trump Has A Legal Case To Contest Pennsylvania (thefederalist.com)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?